User talk:Akshaypatill/Archives/2021/January

January 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Tony Kakkar, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''StarUnfolded is not reliable. Also do not remove content from lead.'' Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:39, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tony Kakkar, you may be blocked from editing. ''Stop adding unrelaible sources. Go through WP:ICTF, it has a list of reliable sources.'' Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:06, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Also why are you removing content without proper explanation. Are the remixes supposed to be removed? You should discuss the matter in the talk page as per WP:BRD, instead of edit warring. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:21, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Tony Kakkar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''There is no promotion when writing about their major achievements, debut or breakthrough. See Kareena Kapoor, an FA status article. Besides it was like that before you decided to remove it unanimously without discussion. I noticed that you removed it. Revert your changes and discuss it first as per WP:BRD.'' Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:35, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Dhananjay Munde Wikipedia Page
The given material was well cited. The material as you described was showing as an "Essay" could have been changed to a neutral tone. Without even considering that you deleted the whole section. I am not going to restore the previous version but you should keep your political agenda at home and be more rational when you are deleting something. You successfully managed to highlight something that you wanted to highlight anyway. I want peace and I don't want to promote anyone or defame anybody! :-) peace out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VedikaThorat (talk • contribs) 14:39, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

No. The material wasn't well cited. The cited sources were inadequate as a reference to what you had written. The content written by you was already tagged as 'potential fan views'. And as per your edit history, by removing the sections that were against the entity, in past, you seem to be promoting him anyway. That's why I removed it. Akshaypatill (talk) 06:30, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

And I haven't removed everything. I have kept the content that had valid sources, like 'Awards' for example. Akshaypatill (talk) 06:33, 31 January 2021 (UTC)