User talk:Akshayshetye01

helpme
I was writing a wikipedia article/ creating a page for the first time yesterday. While doing so, I flouted a few Wiki rules. As a result, the IP I used got banned and I am being stopped from editing a page I created (Haptik). Can someone help me on how can I get out of this mess? As I was a new user, I wasn't aware about the Wiki rules of content addition/ edition. I ensure that such a mistake won't be repeated.

Basically, I have two questions 1. How do I uplift the ban on my IP? 2. How do I uplift the ban on me editing any wiki page?


 * Please use the unblock template if you wish to request an unblock. Primefac (talk) 11:12, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Akshayshetye01, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Haptik, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Andrew Y talk 09:33, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Haptik


A tag has been placed on Haptik requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - Andrew Y talk 09:33, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Haptik
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Haptik, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://appshopper.com/lifestyle/haptik-messenger-expert-help-with-operators-banks-airlines-electronics-cable-tv-insurance-e-commerce-and-many-others.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:32, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Shrikanthv (talk) 09:05, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Haptik. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. —teb728 t c 09:36, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Haptik. —teb728 t c 09:41, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:58, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Note to reviewing admin: New sock User:Apurva.mudgal was created this morning, shortly after this appeal. Yunshui 雲 水 08:57, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Hey Yunshui, Apurva Mudgal isn't a sock user. Since both my IDs were blocked, I asked my colleague to edit the Haptik page with new content.
 * Meatpuppet, then. . Asking someone else to proxy edit on your behalf, especially when that account is indistinguishable from your own, is also not allowed. Anyone with an ounce of common sense would realise that, even if it wasn't in the policy. Yunshui 雲 水 09:56, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Hey Yunshui, Can you please suggest a way out? Since the content was new and I was banned for creating another account, I thought the page could be recreated by my colleague. Does this mean, Haptik page cannot be created by anyone? Apologies for the ignorance. However, being a first time user, I will be glad if you can help me out on how I could start using wikipedia again?
 * At this point, the standard offer is probably most appropriate. Leave Wikipedia for six months, without creating sock accounts (or getting others to create them for you), then come back and request an unblock, addressing the reasons for the original block. However, even if you are allowed back, you will not be allowed to write about Haptik, since it's clear that your conflict of interest prevents you from writing neutral content about the company. Therefore, if you have no other interest on Wikipedia beyond creating this article, there is really no point in your returning at all.
 * Incidentally, I have now create-protected the Haptik article; it can now only be recreated by a Wikipedia administrator. Yunshui 雲 水 10:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC)