User talk:Akshit VS

Welcome!
Hello, Akshit VS, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Khomane Deelip, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Jim Carter (from public cyber)  12:30, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Khomane Deelip


The article Khomane Deelip has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  Jim Carter (from public cyber)  12:30, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Ghat ghat ka paani moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Ghat ghat ka paani, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 20:50, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Ghat Ghat Ka Paani
Hello, Akshit VS

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username North8000 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Ghat Ghat Ka Paani, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Ghat Ghat Ka Paani.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Hey. Wanted to enquire on why do you intend to delete the post? Akshit VS (talk) 19:10, 4 April 2020 (UTC)AkshitVS

Response
Sorry, I didn't receive/see your ping until today. By "post" I assume that you mean the article. The short version of my answer is what I put at the AFD:


 * "Reviewed as a part of new article curation / review process. No indication of wp:notability.  Of the two references given, one is to their own web site and the other is to an article that has one paragraph on it.  Another concern is that editor is obviously wiki-experienced but created the full article upon their 6th lifetime edit under that user name."

Now, to provide more explanation for each item:

"Reviewed as a part of new article curation / review process." I'm a volunteer who reviews new articles. At the core of that is either confirming that an article should exist under per Wikipedia's guidelines and policies (see below) or if it should not, raising the question and letting the Wikipedia community decide, in this case at articles for deletion Articles for deletion/Ghat Ghat Ka Paani Until a new article receives such a review, it is tagged as needing the review and is removed from access by search engines. So basically, this involves me doing my volunteer job to the best of my ability.

"No indication of wp:notability. Of the two references given, one is to their own web site and the other is to an article that has one paragraph on it."   I don't want to repeat the two relevant guidlines and so I'll list them here and ask you to give them a quick read before reading further here:

WP:notability

Notability (films)

Now that you've given them a quick read.... The main guideline WP:notability requires in-depth coverage of the topic in multiple independent sources. My post at AFD says that the article has nowhere near that, and describes what is there. The secondary guideline Notability (films) in essence says that if the film fulfills the listed attributes the primary guideline can be temporarily bypassed, but there is no indication that it fulfills any of those.

"Another concern is that editor is obviously wiki-experienced but created the full article upon their 6th lifetime edit under that user name" As a minimum this raises concerns that you are editing under multiple undeclared user names which is basically not allowed. The particulars described combined with a situation that the film would significantly be elevated and receive commercial advantage by having a Wikipedia article raises concerns about undisclosed paid editing, which is not allowed and which Wikipedia considers to be a serious problem. This is not to accuse or address that, in this context it's just indication that there may be considerations other than the usual ones for the creation of the article.

If there any more questions or if I can be of assistance, please ping me or write me on my talk page. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 14:51, 7 April 2020 (UTC)