User talk:Aktajsa

Ways to improve The Chancers
Hi, I'm Jbhunley. Aktajsa, thanks for creating The Chancers!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please consider returning to the article to address the issue(s). I also removed a cut/paste copyright violation. All text must be written in your own words. See WP:COPYRIGHT.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. J bh Talk  18:46, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Chancers
Hello Aktajsa,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Chancers for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. J bh Talk  14:21, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Paid/COI Notification
Hello Aktajsa. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message.
 * Because you identified yourself as a member/representative of the band here [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Chancers&oldid=686183156] J bh  Talk  16:05, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Answer to Paid/COI Notification
Well, although I'm member of the band, I'm not being paid by anyone and more precisely I'm not being paid at all. We run the band from our resources and in our spare time. All the money we raise from live shows we use to cover the bands expenses only. Therefore there is no employer, client and affiliation to disclose. Is there any chance to get the edit source of the last version of the deleted The Chancers article to amend it and write it in a neutral way while keeping the format and fact sections like Band Members, Discography, Videos, etc. as it was?
 * As a member of the band our paid/COI guidelines do apply to you because you have a financial interest in its success whether you are formally paid or not makes no difference. Please read WP:COIDISCLOSEPAY. You should use  on your user page and place   on the article talk page. You also must note   in all edit summaries of edits you make relating to the band anywhere on Wikipedia cf the article, its talk page, noticeboard  discussions etc. It looks like the article has been deleted as a copyright infringement. All contributions to Wikipedia must be in your own words. If you wrote something that was published somewhere else it must be released under copyright terms compatible with Wikipedia. Please see WP:COPYRIGHT for how to go about that. Also please read Wikipedia's general notability guidelines as well as our notability criteria for bands and musicians before you recreate the article to make sure the band passes our requirements for articles. Wikipedia is not for promotion. Please make all required disclosures if you recreate the article. Thank you for your understanding.  J bh  Talk  13:16, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Age of Rudeness
Hello Aktajsa,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Age of Rudeness for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. J bh Talk  11:32, 18 October 2015 (UTC)