User talk:Al Andaluz Toledano

Al Andaluz Toledano, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Bibliometric Indicators for Publishers
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bibliometric Indicators for Publishers, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://bipublishers.es/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:58, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bibliometric Indicators for Publishers


A tag has been placed on Bibliometric Indicators for Publishers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://bipublishers.es/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Largo Plazo (talk) 10:14, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Academic Publishing discussion
Hello,

If you wish to discuss your edits to Academic publishing, please do so at the article talk page rather than on my user talk page.

Thanks

--ChrisSampson87 (talk) 13:43, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
&mdash;Skyllfully (talk &#124; contribs) 05:48, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bibliometric Indicators for Publishers


The article Bibliometric Indicators for Publishers has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable research group.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 13:50, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Research School for Socio-Economic and Natural Sciences of the Environment


The article Research School for Socio-Economic and Natural Sciences of the Environment has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Coatrack article to promote studies showing that Nova Publishers are a top publisher. Not a single one of the references is actually about this "research school".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 14:04, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Research School for Socio-Economic and Natural Sciences of the Environment for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Research School for Socio-Economic and Natural Sciences of the Environment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Research School for Socio-Economic and Natural Sciences of the Environment until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 22:08, 2 November 2015 (UTC)