User talk:Alamatp2

December 2017
Hello, Alamatp2, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. '' Note, also, that abusive behaviour towards other editors (such as this, this, and this) are battleground behaviour, aside from misuse of the article talk page and my own talk page. Please read up on appropriate use of talk pages, and familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines before you continue editing. If you wish to report me for being 'abusive', you are more than welcome to do so.'' Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:26, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I am escalating this because you are the one abusing tags. I made the other account because I forgot the password or it was changed to the other one (notice they are the same name? Why would I make multiple accounts then name the same?)Alamatp2 (talk) 06:53, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If you didn't want a problem you shouldn't have abused the undo feature and instead contested each point. It's your fault for abusing the tags against me, rather than saying what is POV. Tell me what is POV here or on the talk page.Alamatp2 (talk) 07:04, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Jack Frost. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Czechs seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jack Frost (talk) 07:11, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Czechs. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jack Frost (talk) 07:25, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * Jack Frost, if you continue to engage in this without saying what is POV like the agitant, then I will notify the administrators. For the last time, the other party whom you did nothing about WAS NOT DOING THIS. You will see I have. I have asked repeatedly to identify the POV. Alamatp2 (talk) 07:45, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Warning
You are edit warring on both Polish tribes and Czechs, and will certainly be blocked if you persist. You can't push your preferred content into articles by edit warring, and not by poorly considered complaints on ANI either. Bishonen &#124; talk 10:38, 17 December 2017 (UTC).

December 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   10:47, 17 December 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 12:33, 17 December 2017 (UTC)