User talk:Alamosurfer

Your submission at Articles for creation: Echo Transportation (May 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Echo Transportation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Echo Transportation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Echo_Transportation Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gene93k&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Echo_Transportation reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

• Gene93k (talk) 02:55, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Reply
Thank you for stating that you have no conflict of interest. That doesn't mean you can write what you like, you must follow the guidance below. Also note that anything you post on Wikipedia is public from when you press the "publish" button.


 * you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that he meets the notability guidelines for creative professionals. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls. Although you gave many refs, mot were unsuitable; Amazon is a sales site, many of your links were quoting him or interviews with him rather than genuine independent third-party sources or of only local interest. You've been told this before in a previous message on this page
 * you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, not stuff like fulfills [sic] dreams of deserving children
 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. (this is guidance, not an accusation)

The fact that other articles have not been deleted doesn't help you, either they met the criteria or should be deleted as well. See What about article x?

Please check that you can find proper genuinely independent sources. If you assure me that you can, I'll restore as a cleaned-up draft. No rush since I'm going to be away for a few days anyway Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:06, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Understood, thanks Jim for the greater explanation. I can find additional third party sources and will remove those that do not meet Wikipedia's criteria. If you can reinstate the draft, I will clean up the draft as I better understand the guidelines. Perhaps I should have chosen a different category, it seems there is a lot of scrutiny for a biography of a living person.Alamosurfer (talk) 16:40, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John R. DiJulius III (October 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hasteur was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John R. DiJulius III and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John R. DiJulius III, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:John_R._DiJulius_III Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hasteur&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:John_R._DiJulius_III reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hasteur (talk) 23:10, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:John R. DiJulius III concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:John R. DiJulius III, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:John R. DiJulius III


Hello, Alamosurfer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John R. DiJulius III".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:57, 23 July 2020 (UTC)