User talk:Alan1000

Welcome!
Hello, Alan1000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Srleffler (talk) 01:17, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

May 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Random-access memory, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jasper Deng (talk) 16:35, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Parity of zero
Please, discuss your suggestions about subsets [ on the talk page] first. It makes an impression of WP:original research and, in any way, was not sourced, so I removed it completely from the article. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2016
Hello, I'm David.moreno72. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Religion in Jersey— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. David.moreno72 (talk) 15:51, 18 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Re: a long term tendency to add unsourced content to multiple articles, based on your personal observations--please don't. Wikipedia's guidelines are really clear on this--unsourced and original research content aren't acceptable. To respect that is not, as you've characterized it, a function of authoritative reach, but one of the basic tenets of a reputable encyclopedia. I've removed your most recent edits, and encourage you to contribute, supporting your additions with the inclusion of WP:RELIABLE sources. Thanks, 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:31, 18 March 2016 (UTC)