User talk:AlanD/Archive 1

License tagging for Image:RFA resource and wessex.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RFA resource and wessex.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 14:08, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Chippenham
I think I've fixed the problem with the lost Chippenham talk page - by redirecting to the old page. CarolGray 22:08, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

BUT you won't see a difference unless your purge your cache. CarolGray 22:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Good, glad it works. If you don't mind, I will remove your "cut-and-paste" changes to the other talk page, because they would be very confusing to any else who comes along...CarolGray 22:16, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick revert to the Chippenham vandalism. I have placed a level 2 warning on the IP talk page. It is the only contributions from this IP on record so hopefully that will be enough. Thanks again. AlanD 15:51, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Welcome. No problem. --  Szvest   -  Wiki me up ®  16:04, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the Barnstar Alan! I've had a quick look at the (huge) list of suggestions for improvements from yourself, Foxhill and that semi-automatic one. Hopefully I'll find time to do some more soon. Maybe not this weekend because the weather's supposed to be nice and I'll get accused of being obsessed if I spend all day staring at Wikipedia! I'll have a look through my photos and see what could be used for the page. The Hugmonster 23:34, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application
Dear AlanD,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that you have 70 mainspace edits. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 16:22, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Vandal
No problem, glad I could help. Shadow1 (talk) 00:35, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Edit summaries
AlanD - good work on those reverts today. Always good to see a new user going after vandalism. However, I want to ask you to do one thing a little differently. In your edit summaries, please just summarize your edit, rather than directing comments at another user (as you did here). If you want to discuss the edit, do so on the article's talk page, or on the user's talk page. Trust me, we all slip up on this one from time to time, but please try not to make it a habit. Thanks! | Mr. Darcy talk 05:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, AlanD! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 03:51, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

I love you. You help so much. Marry me! Wheeeeeeeeeeeee! 69.177.38.21 21:31, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, AlanD! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 02:51, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
I fixed the approval bug from last night. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 15:53, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
I fixed the approval bug from last night. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 15:53, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Doctor Who
Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors. See Assume good faith for the guidelines on this. GreenJoe 20:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

There was no lack of good faith if an editor swears in an edit summary it must be commented on. It is inappropriate.AlanD 22:19, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I didn't swear. GreenJoe 22:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Whatever. Asses is swearing and your tone showed it to be so. AlanD 20:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)