User talk:AlanSi91/sandbox

Alan's Peer Review Very great start to your article, it is informative and all statements are backed up through citations from studies. I am very impressed with the quality of the work thus far. There are some issues with grammatical errors that can be addressed simply through a quick review of the writing. Some things that might be done to improve this article thus far would be to perhaps go into more detail on in regards to some of the statements made in the article. For example, could you expand on what sort of “disasters” has caused an increase in Sex and Gender Based Violence against women and girls in Zimbabwe? This is a great first draft and gave me a lot of insight into how I should be structuring my own work and utilizing the information I have found into an unbiased and informative article as opposed to an argumentative research paper.

Lenapd (talk) 21:30, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Sascha's peer review
I like that you prepared many sources and already used them. The content is written in a neutral content and easy to read also for me as a german. At the moment the structure is missing but thats fine cause it is just the beginning of the article and most people did not start yet. Good Job! — Preceding unsigned comment added by SaschaCSULB (talk • contribs) 23:16, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Stipe's Peer Review
- Is there any information on why some women in Zimbabwe have lower self esteem?

- How does this affect the country politically, culturally, sociologically etc.?

- Are there any statistics to support the gender gap in the job markets in Zimbabwe?

- Good job incorporating relevant facts into your article. So far it appears that you are on the right track.

- Including specific examples of foreign aid that are being implemented to decrease the gender gap in Zimbabwe would support the statements that you made about the closing gender equality gap. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stipem94 (talk • contribs) 23:38, 18 October 2018 (UTC)