User talk:Alan Isherwood/Archives/2009/August

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! :))Lectonar 15:44, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Page moves for Australian Banknotes
Hey,

I noticed you moved all the Australian banknotes to new locations (eg. Five dollar note (Australian) to $5 note (Australian)). I was wondering if you had a particular reason in mind when you did it? Personally I feel it is more clearer in the old way, minus the special characters (ie "$") --DWZ (talk • email • contribs) 10:24, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi there. The reason I created a new Australian banknotes page, was to allow for more detail, and content on Australian banknotes, so that people can add more to the topic in general. I feel this is an important link to the pages about the individual notes (see below). Plus there had been comments on the Australian dollar talk pages, requesting that this topic should be opened up in a new page (for the same reasons).
 * The reason I move articles, in general, is because it is almost impossible to find a very specific article (if you're just unfamiliar, or accessing an article for the first time). So if you typed '$5' or '$5 note', you might get taken to a search screen which contains links like Fifty dollar Canadian bill etc. I believe articles should be named in a way which allows for ease of access, is easier to remember, or just guess.
 * I have taken a bit of care to ensure that previous article names, and redirects all match up properly. Thus the 'flow' of documents, and links shouldn't be interrupted. I have also made links from articles such as $1, $2, $5 etc.
 * As far as 'funny characters are concerned, well, I don't feel this is particularly important. I realise that the Wiki style guide intends for articles to be properly named, and classified. However, this often means that when brackets are appended onto an article name, it makes them difficult to find (as I mentioned before). And in any case, brackets are also 'funny characters'. Furthermore, the 'new' article names are exactly the same as the old ones, just in a more accessible format. (Extra3 13:33, 3 February 2007 (UTC))

Forgiven
You are forgiven. Seriously, I wouldn't worry about it. It is a sad fact that it is impossible to see glaring errors in preview mode, yet they are obvious once you've hit the save button. And some editors prefer to save incrementally. Hesperian 11:54, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Adoption
Hello, ! I see that you have expressed an interest in being adopted by an experienced editor. I accept your request, being an experienced editor myself. Whether you want to learn about wiki markup, find something to do, or just talk to somebody, I'm the one you can talk to - just leave a message on my talk page. Good luck with Wikipedia! --Maelwys 13:32, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * yay :) Thank You! --DWZ (talk • email • contribs) 22:48, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

How's it going?
Hey DWZ. I've just been checking out some of your recent edits, and it looks like you're doing a great job so far, and making lots of good contributions. Don't worry too much about the image copyright problems, everybody hates those and they're always a bit of a pain! Anyway, if you have any issues or questions that you need help with, just let me know! --Maelwys 13:47, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * hehe, thanks :) I felt a little stupid over the entire image copyright thing - I spent like 10 minutes before I uploaded it trying to make sure I did it right, and still managed to stuffed it up.  Ahh well, at least I will know for next time. But I've been having fun with it all, so it's all good. Anyway, thanks for checking up on me - I'm sure I'll have questions in the future :) --DWZ (talk • email • contribs) 19:40, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: My first question
Hey DWZ. Good question about that article, it does indeed look suspect. There's a couple things that you could try. The CSD A7 would indeed be appropriate in this case, since there's very little information listed about it to show it's notability. But since it was just created last night, it could also be that they simply haven't yet had time to add anything to it. So if you want to give them the benefit of the doubt that they'll continue adding to the article over the next few days, instead you could put a prod tag on the article, so that if they don't continue working on it in the next few days it'll get deleted then. It's quicker and easier than creating a whole AfD process, but gives them more time to respond with improvements than a speedy deletion does, in cases where actual improvements could make the article worthwhile to have around. Any other questions, just let me know. --Maelwys 12:36, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, interesting, I hadn't seen prod before. I guess I'll give that a go and see what happens.  On another note, when having a conversation with someone on Wikipedia through talk pages (like this one), is it customary to do replies on the other person's talk page? Like, this reply I'm typing now, would you suggest I should keep it on my talk page, or would it generally be considered better if I leave it on yours under my original question?  Thanks again for your help :) --DWZ (talk • email • contribs) 03:35, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

test
this is a test (and yes, there is a reason why I'm not using the sandbox) --DWZ (talk • email • contribs) 13:03, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Donnie Davies
Hello. Thanks for contributing to the Donnie Davies (3rd nomination), but I just recently posted new evidence and sources for the reversal of the deletion that perhaps you were unaware of before including a variety of sources. The sources discuss the significance of him as a fictional persona and the controversy that revolves around the use of that and the magnitude of his reach. If the Wikipedia Amnesia Test was applied, the article would hardly be biographical, but more along the lines of something address an urban myth/spoof. Please review my new evidence in light of the timing. Again, thanks for your consideration. --SquatGoblin 14:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

One Dollar
Hi DWZ, sorry for deleting the article. I supposed it would not be fixed as Wikipedian27 stated. But I tried after your message and this redirect works this way. Sorry for bothering you. Now it has been redirected to $1. Regards, Shyam  ( T / C ) 00:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem, thanks for getting back to me so quickly. DWZ (talk • email • contribs) 00:21, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Currency Question
Hey DWZ, It's a good question that you had. I've taken a look around, and unfortunately it's one that's not really addressed anywhere directly. For some information on related questions (that unfortunately doesn't seem to directly address yours) you can see WikiProject Numismatics/Style and Manual of Style (dates and numbers). Unfortunately Naming conventions (numbers and dates) doesn't have anything in it at all. But, judging by the related references on the above pages, and what seems to be the current standard, I'd say that your suggestion of leaving them spelled out, with the short form pages redirected to the long versions makes the most sense. Probably the best way to get it done without getting into an edit war or anything would be to follow the instructions to list it on Requested moves (not as an Uncontroversial move obviously, since there's apparantly a disagreement on it). You can specifically make sure you read the section on Multiple Page Moves and list all the affected pages on a single entry, since they should be all kept the same and no point having the discussion in more than one place. Good luck with filling out the move request form, and if you need anymore specific information on how to do that, just let me know. --Maelwys 16:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Dilpurra, New South Wales
Hi I noticed you fixed the coordinates on this page - thank you. You may have just stumbled on the article but I was wondering if you lived in the area because if you do (or even if you don't) then please accept an invitation to join up to WikiProject Riverina. There are only a few of us but we are very dedicated and we have managed to catalogue almost every city/town/location at Template:Riverina. Anyway we'd be very pleased to have you come on board and help. Let me know?-- VS talk 22:15, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Medicare card.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Medicare card.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:16, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Logoswin.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Logoswin.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  PxMa 23:46, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Australia newsletter
WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC).

WikiProject Australia newsletter
WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC).

WikiProject Australia newsletter,December 2008
The December 2008 issue of the WikiProject Australia newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. This message was delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 07:19, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Ah, 'twas I.
Thanks for the welcome over at User talk:70.104.7.249. I was working both here and at Commons and when I signed off at Commons, it must have signed me off here. It's a great feeling to see folks like you on new user patrol leaving that wonderful welcome. I still remember mine. :) Regards, --PMDrive1061 (talk) 19:01, 28 August 2009 (UTC)