User talk:Alangammon

Welcome
 Hello Alangammon, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of Contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
 * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article Wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
 * Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.


 * Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[Image:Signature_icon.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Alangammon, good luck, and have fun. --Cloveapple (talk) 08:53, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Two guidelines it might be helpful to read
If you stop by the article you were working on you'll see that there are some formal looking notices on it. That just means that a couple editors have noticed some things that need fixing. Once they get fixed the banners can come down. Articles in progress are often marked up that way.

The most important banner right now is the one talking about "notability." "Notable" is just Wikipedia's word for an article subject that has independent coverage from multiple reliable sources (for example newspaper coverage). Notability is the main necessity for keeping an article in Wikipedia. The policy on how to tell if a politician meets Wikipedia's notability requirements is at: WP:POLITICIAN. Things like personal blogs don't count as reliable sources and neither do message boards, twitter, or facebook. If you know of any news coverage that supports any of the article's facts add it as best you can and don't worry about the exact formatting. Getting it up there is more important and it can get smoothed out later.

I'd also reccomend taking a look at WP:COI and being familiar with that policy so you can decide if it applies. Anybody who is very close to the subject of an article (a relative, an employee, a friend, the subject themself) is "strongly encouraged" to declare their interest on their user page & any relevant article talk pages.

Hope that helps. Cloveapple (talk) 09:34, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Alan Gammon. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Cind. amuse  14:15, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add sources as embedded links. Adding links in this manner, as you have done to the Alan Gammon article causes more work for other editors to cleanup. See WP:CITE for more information on appropriate citation of sources. Thank you.  Cind. amuse  08:37, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Edit summaries and "watch" feature
I think you might be missing part of the conversation about the Alan Gammon article. (This place takes a while to figure out and I'm still working on it myself.) When people edit the article they also leave a little message to other editors called an "edit summary." The summary might say what they changed or why, or might be some other related comment. There are two ways you can see all these comments.
 * 1) You can go to the article and click on the "history" tab up at the very top of the article. That shows you all the edits, who made them, and their edit summary comments.
 * 2) You can click the "watch" tab up at the very top of the article (or at the top of any page). This will generate your own personal watchlist of all the edits and edit summary comments people have made on pages you are watching. Once you are watching articles you can reach the watchlist through the "watchlist" link on the top right of every page.

It's also polite to leave your own edit summaries. Or if what you have to say is longer, you can just say "see the talk page" and post a note there. That way everyone who works on the article is kept in the loop. And if you see a note that puzzles you, you can always ask the person on their talk page or on the article's talk page. Cloveapple (talk) 09:34, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Alangammon. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Alan Gammon, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ミラP 03:57, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Alan Gammon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alan Gammon, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Alan Gammon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 5 November 2021 (UTC)