User talk:Alansohn/Archive 21

DYK for Doris Abrahams
Number 424 (297 create/expand - 127 nominations) Shubinator (talk) 06:27, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Kermit Bloomgarden
Number 425 (298 create/expand - 127 nominations) Shubinator (talk) 06:27, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Nixon's Last Press Conference
Number 426 (299 create/expand - 127 nominations)

DYK for Ralph Mercado
Number 427 (300 create/expand - 127 nominations)

DYK for Lawrence Herkimer
Number 428 (301 create/expand - 127 nominations) Shubinator (talk) 20:10, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism?
Quite frankly sir, it is not my fault that you have such a low grasp on Norse mythology. I myself am from Oslo, Norway, and I'm sure I know more about my homeland than you do. The fact that you reverted my edit shows your incompetence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.186.168.203 (talk) 02:36, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * As a mere resident of New Jersey, having reviewed the edit in question, my lack of in-depth knowledge of Norse mythology was no impediment to identifying your edit as vandalism, in all its epicness. Alansohn (talk) 02:47, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Epicness&mdash;NICE! Think we need a (non dict def) entry for it. Some references
 * http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/print?id=1491704&type=page2Story
 * http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/27/AR2007072700731_pf.html
 * http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2007/feb/11/popandrock.features
 * http://www.guardian.co.uk/travel/2006/dec/02/green.saturday.environment
 * http://www.independent.ie/entertainment/film-cinema/lavish-costumes-and-panstick-conceal-a-rather-ordinary-film-125886.html
 * http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/4123406.stm
 * http://www.laweekly.com/1999-07-15/music/dark-angels/
 * Bongo matic  03:06, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

"Notable alumni" of minor league teams
Hi. Another editor, NatureBoyMD, has come up with what I think is a good and thoughtful template and conditions for a "notable alumni" list for a minor league team that interests him. See. I thought that before he finalizes it, it/he might benefit from you taking a glance at it, and giving him any comments that you may have, since I could see it being used for other minor league teams (its better than anything I've seen), and you are a baseball editor whose views I respect. Feel free to leave your comments on it for him on my home talk page at the above url, as that is where he and I have been discussing it. Thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 05:34, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Interesting fellows
Bongo matic  05:39, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Arthur Code
 * Jack Lorenz
 * Patrick Kinna

INSULTING
STOP INSULTING THE WIKIPEDIA! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.252.234.42 (talk) 15:49, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

You needn't worry
You needn't worry that I'm seriously plotting to assassinate troublesome categories. For one, I'm not a bureaucrat, nor would I want to be one, so I can't satisfy my own stated pre-requisites for perpetration. Secondly, it would of course be an affront to the principle of "consensus", which (at least until further notice) is foundational. Thirdly, it would surely result in the perpetrators getting banned; nobody wants to be banned. Fourthly, I couldn't handle the media attention. Fifthly, what would my auntie Kay think? Lastly, there are not enough knives in all the world to properly finish the job on the category tree. Good Ol’factory (talk) 21:21, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm worried. I'm very worried. I've already seen the damage that can and will be done to those who dare to disagree, even without all the knives sharpened. Trivializing the Holocaust and child molestation, and now turning the Night of the Long Knives into a sick joke, is a rather disturbing precedent for any administrator, even one whose not a bureaucrat. Alansohn (talk) 21:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Relax, Alansohn. It was a passing joke—whether or not it's "sick" or not, I'm unsure—I'll have to get a fecal sample from it to know for sure. :) Just to clarify, I don't have a problem with users disagreeing with me on issues as opinion-dependent as the existence of a particular category. You can choose be "very worried" about all of this if you want—don't misunderstand me as being bossy or ordering you not to—but my suggestion would be that life is too short and for most people there are probably more important and relevant things to spend your "worry time" on. Good Ol’factory (talk) 21:47, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

DRV
I have opened a DRV on the wrangler categories, on which you opined. Occuli (talk) 02:43, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for James Beach
Number 429 (302 create/expand - 127 nominations)

Possibly of concern to you
I was looking at a user's contributions and quite by accident I saw that the user had edited User talk:Alansohn2. Is User:Alansohn2 anything to do with you? If not, we might want to take further steps, as there's a possible risk of impersonation due to the similarity of your names. (The new account edited a page on NJ and also posted a warning on a user talk page, which is why I thought it might be you experimenting with another account, but if not this increases the potential confusion problems of a user using this name.) Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:23, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Fort Lee is about 5 miles away, but it's not me. There is a genuine possibility that its could be someone else with the same name, which would be quite a coincidence but far from impossible. I'd keep an eye on the account. It doesn't appear to be someone trying to spoof my edits, but the person could be close enough that some of our edits might overlap. Alansohn (talk) 02:20, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Let me know if you run into any trouble from it and I'll help if I can. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:48, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * You are so sneaky, Alansohn, selecting such an unguessable name for your sock. Good sleuthing, Good Olfactory! Keep up the vigilance! Bongo  matic  02:56, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I guess I never thought anyone would make the connection to my "other" ID. I am so glad that I've been saving my Dunkin' Donuts receipts since my last sockpuppet problem cropped up. Alansohn (talk) 02:59, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Huh, wha? I never thought of this as a "sock" problem at all. Had this been the "real" Alansohn's other account I would have assumed, based on the accounts edits, that he was simply experimenting with using another account. My concern was actually that another user was trying to impersonate our fine editor here. If you're just mocking me for the sake of doing so, Bongo, I'm now going to laugh along .... (ha ha ha cough cough gurgle...) Good Ol’factory (talk) 04:53, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I think that Bongo was joking here, as was I. No gurgling necessary. Alansohn (talk) 20:39, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I thought probably that was the case—I tried to laugh along and then it got stuck in my throat ... I can dish it out but I can't take it ... Good Ol’factory (talk) 20:51, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank You
...For removing the vandalism on my talk page Dougofborg (talk) 14:36, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Martin Knowlton
Number 430 (303 create/expand - 127 nominations)

Arundhati Roy
Please check index.php?title=Arundhati_Roy&action=history and revert to include latest info about Roy's list. Each objection is carefully addressed, then the edit gets reverted anyway by two editors working in tandem. Thanks, 74.162.153.220 (talk) 16:35, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I'd like to restore this edit. Please see this about "Roy's List" then this about the edit. Thanks, 65.246.126.130 (talk) 21:10, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

SimplySim
|Bibikha is not a vandal, he is a sockpuppet for user talk:HugovivScientus (talk) 18:35, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Continued vandalism
There has been repeat vandalism from a shared user account that you have previously notified User talk:194.221.133.211. I guess that Aviva employees have nothing better to do than vandalise Wikipedia... Could you arrange a block? DiverScout (talk) 20:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert on my userpage
Thank you, also great work in the recent changes, keep it up! All the best SpitfireTally-ho! 20:58, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Mannfield, Florida
I am not vandalizing this page. Do your reasearch and pay attention to the links, the proof was there all along. You can make Wikipedia more enjoyable by reading what is presented to you first before making assumptions on what is correct and not correct - got it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.108.255.76 (talk) 21:33, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The discrepancy between the title of Mansfield, Florida and the name in the article is what made this appear to be vandalism. I am investigating and will try to help resolve this issue. Alansohn (talk) 22:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi, yes I'm looking at it too. Ghost towns can be tricky, it seems. :) See the ref list I've added to the talk page. Proofreader77 (talk) 23:23, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Follow-up - After carefully investigating (and checking "Mansfield, Florida" as well), I'm satisfied that Mannfield is the correct name in this case. I have moved it. Like Obama, I take responsibility for this. :) Cheers. Proofreader77 (talk) 00:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Follow-up NOTE: I did not remove the warning on 12.108.255.76 talk (did not want to act on your behalf without your approval). Proofreader77 (talk) 00:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC) Since you are apparently offline, I have removed the warning in question (since the information I've added to the talk page has substantially changed the equation of available information for decision). If further evaluation suggests the warning should be restored, please excuse this ephemeral action. :) Proofreader77 (talk) 02:57, 26 March 2009 (UTC) (Edited: Proofreader77 (talk) 02:57, 26 March 2009 (UTC))


 * SOME ONE NEEDS TO REMOVE IT AND STOP JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS, ESPECIALLY WHEN THE FACTS ARE ALREADY IN FRONT OF YOU.--12.108.255.76 (talk) 01:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


 * It appears Alansohn is off duty at this time. (I will respond further on your talk page) Proofreader77 (talk) 02:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

DRV of the Wrangler categories
I'm unhappy with your comment about my "concocting an excuse" to close the Second Wrangler category as "delete" because I put my personal views above process. You may have missed my comment that I closed the 2008 discussion as "keep", so I don't know why you think my views accord with the outcome. Please retract your remarks. Regards, BencherliteTalk 11:54, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Are you planning to reply? Or do I have to raise the matter elsewhere, given your prima facie assumption of bad faith on my part? BencherliteTalk 18:24, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Just so we're entirely clear, this is the diff I'm talking about. BencherliteTalk 18:26, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I hadn't seen your earlier note. I will review and make a determination as to what modification would be appropriate to more accurately reflect your actions in closing this CfD under discussion. Alansohn (talk) 18:31, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Regards, BencherliteTalk 18:35, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * When? You've been doing plenty of editing since I left the second message, let alone the first message, and I'm disappointed that you haven't given this a higher priority. BencherliteTalk 09:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I had been trying to word my response and hadn't had a chance to stop by DRV. I have replied and made it clear that I do not believe that you "concocted" anything, rather that there was a misapplication and misinterpretation of Wikipedia policy in closing the CfD in question. I hope this addresses your concerns. Please feel free to respond further either on my talk page or at DRV. Alansohn (talk) 12:33, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for removing any suggestion of bad faith. The reasonableness of my closure is clearly something upon which people can, and do, differ, and so I don't have any remaining issues with your comments.  Regards, BencherliteTalk 14:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

re: "good and evil"
"Hear hear!" for your words (on your user page) re "common sense."

P.S. re "poop" -- Here's to ever-smarter bots, so we don't have to scoop. :) Proofreader77 (talk) 01:00, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Better bots would be one option, but leash laws might be even better. Alansohn (talk) 02:04, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Majidmushtaq
Hi Alansohn, I wonder if you'd be willing to look again at the warning you gave this newbie. It looks to me like Majid was blanking stuff he'd written after it had been challenged.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  18:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * As requested, and after further review of the circumstances, I removed the warning. Alansohn (talk) 18:58, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thankyou very much.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  19:47, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Again, my sorriness is weighty
I want to apologize dearly to you, my friend, for my work on Sallust. I have ADD and cannot pay attention. So I sit with a book and read until I can't and then make Sallust different. I understand this is wrong and that I have no business doing it. Much love for the new Year. 128.197.244.131 (talk) 20:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Interesting person

 * Lawrence Salander
 * Thanks for the notice. Looking at the article, Salander-O'Reilly Galleries might be a better subject for this article, as there seems to be little about the person, and lots about his business. Alansohn (talk) 01:51, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Not sure I agree&mdash;the bankruptcy and crimes are personal, the gallery was 100% owned and run by him. As the articles point out, the art business is a trust one, person-to-person, not person-to-company. Bongo  matic  02:13, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Hey there, thanks for getting rid of the vandalism on my userpage. I really appreciate it. MelicansMatkin (talk) 03:04, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Dorothea Holt Redmond
Number 431 (304 create/expand - 127 nominations)

DYK for George Hedges
Number 432 (305 create/expand - 127 nominations)

A couple more
Enjoy, Bongo  matic  08:56, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Bill Bogash
 * Earl Wood

DYK help?
Hello! By any chance can you help with making this a DYK? I am not sure how to add these things, but I think this referenced fact would be a good one to include. Best, --A NobodyMy talk 17:55, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * This would have been a great candidate for a hook, but the article doesn't meet the qualifications for DYK. Per WP:DYK, an article must be new or have been expanded fivefold within the past five days. As this article is a rather old one, and has not met the expansion requirement, it would not be eligible. I'll be happy to take a look at any new / newly-expanded articles. Alansohn (talk) 18:09, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, what about with this? As you can see I expanded the article considerably?  Could we ask, "Did you know that Will Kane's was Gary Cooper's second Academy Award winning role?" or "Did you know that Will Kane is ranked fourteenth on Entertainment Weeklys list of Top 20 Heroes of all time?"  Best, --A NobodyMy talk 19:31, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Little tikes
I have restored the above article to the following location: User:Alansohn/Little tikes. ... disco spinster   talk  13:43, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Just as I have explained on Discospinster's page, the page was deleted multiple times as blatant copy-and-paste copyright infringement of ; I tagged for G11 the first time because I couldn't find the copyvio. MuZemike 16:38, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I've restored it to User:Alansohn/Little Tikes for you. ...  disco spinster   talk  19:27, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Your message on my talk page
... was probably intended for User talk:Peteryesness, author of a deleted-by-me article about a non-notable backup singer. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  19:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * You are absolutely correct. This is not the first time that Huggle has had me send a message to the wrong page, and I will be even more careful the next time (and will still screw it up). Thanks for relocating the message to its correct destination. Alansohn (talk) 19:13, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

142.23.96.174
He/she is a vandal. Please have a look at its talk... --Calgaco (talk) 20:39, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Glenn Sundby
Number 433 (306 create/expand - 127 nominations) Shubinator (talk) 15:46, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK triple
Number 434-436 (309 create/expand - 127 nominations)

People of interest
Bongo matic  07:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * William Schwartz (physician)
 * Monte Hale&mdash;already exists, so expansion may need to be significant for DYK, but could be fun.

Jeff Behar
I didnt know how to email you, for the information about Jeff behar and hillsborogh

Professional bodybuilders | Mister-olympia, see: http://mister-olympia.bganzeige.de/professional-bodybuilders

also see:

http://botw.org/top/Sports/Strength_Sports/Bodybuilding/Personal_Page/

You can also just google him, jeff behar writer, jeff behar bodybuilder, jeff Behar NASA, jeff Behar ceo of Musclemagfitness.com

He graduated from hillsboro, 1983.

U can also see him on TV, on comedy central by googling his name and comedy central or going here:

http://www.comedycentral.com/videos/index.jhtml?videoId=70301&title=golds-gym

U can also confirm by checking the hillsboro area at classmates.com

Sorry for having to wroite in here. I did not know how else to email you back with the information you requested.


 * Already replied to user. Alansohn (talk) 13:24, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Alan Barton
My recent post on Alan Barton is factually accurate. Please revert your allegation of vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.39.210.185 (talk) 13:07, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * If it's accurate, I have been unable to find the details regarding the zippo lighter, nor does the wording provide a warm and fuzzy feeling. I will be happy to retract the warning if reliable and verifiable sources can be produced to support the claim, as I was unable to find anything. Alansohn (talk) 14:23, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for reverts
On Hellions of Troy. Amy &quot;Bitches Bruze&quot; Moore (talk) 19:24, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * My pleasure. Alansohn (talk) 18:41, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Needing a bit of help
Spotted a comment on the Bernards High site saying that a reference is needed for the citation of J Geils as a grad. A while ago I saw the 1964 yearbook with his picture in it -also know people who knew him -  & recently saw the following on the internet:

_ June 6th, 2005 BERNARDS HIGH SCHOOL in Bernardsville is celebrating its centennial this month. One famous graduate from the Class of 64 is John W. Geils Jr. Retired librarian and teacher Mary Elizabeth Young who worked at the school for 41 years, recalls J.Geils: QUOTE: "always wore nice slacks and tie and a white shirt and jacket," Source: Bridgewater Courier News - Bridgewater,NJ,USA http://www.funkyjudge.net/geils_newsround_2005.html

- so where does this bring things? no, it is not quite an ironclad reference- but it would seem that it does lend substantial support - what is the protocol in a case like this? and how should this reference be noted? as a total novice, I plead ignorance in regard to these details & and admit to a concern about making a hash of things- If an action is warranted & if it is rather straightforward & you would do it - that would be great & I'll watch & learn. JinNJ (talk) 03:59, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The item is a single sentence quoted on a blog from a newspaper article. While I am familiar with the paper, and I would accept it as a source if I could find it, I have been unable to find the original article. Another search of Google / News / Archive also finds nothing. I don't doubt that he attended, I just can't find a satisfactory source to support the claim. Alansohn (talk) 18:40, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Edit to Department of the Taoiseach that you reverted
Edited that page, because the undoing of previous edit by Anthony Lynch seemed unfair. The link provided was valid after all.

--Fiachra Ó Raghallaigh (talk) 16:43, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The fact that the link exists as described by User:Anthony Lynch exists at Department of the Taoiseach is no reason for inclusion. While I would have little (or lesser) objection to inclusion of the link if it was covered by reliable and verifiable sources, it is not and no sources of any kind are provided. Alansohn (talk) 16:49, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Billy C. Clark
Number 437 (310 create/expand - 127 nominations) --Dravecky (talk) 18:37, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Murray Chotiner
I've nominated this article at FAC. Since you had an interest in it, I was wondering if you might want to take a peek at it and leave comments and views at the FAC page. Thanks!--Wehwalt (talk) 09:52, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

April Fool's DYK for Bob Backus
Number 438 (311 create/expand - 127 nominations)

Gatoclass (talk) 16:14, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Promiscuity
This section originally contained several sources about promiscuity and MSM, but were removed by Allstarecho. Of those statistics he only left those which positively portray MSM. What is your rationale for including only a portion of the statistics? Would you be opposed to allowing the other statistics be reinstated? EJNOGARB 16:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I appreciate your frustration. However, the solution is not a tit-for-tat removal of sourced information. I would suggest that you start discussing the issue on the article's talk page before considering any further actions. Alansohn (talk) 16:20, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * You haven't answered either of my questions. What is your rationale for including only a portion of the statistics? Would you be opposed to allowing the other statistics be reinstated? EJNOGARB  16:24, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Paul Wight
Recently on Raw, the commentator, Michael Cole, said that The Big Show (Paul Wight) weighed in at 485lbs that very morning. Sorry for changing it without anything to back it up, I didn't realise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.40.74 (talk) 17:31, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Reversion at Garry's Mod
Why did you revert my edit to Garry's Mod? My change simply fixed a spelling error, and inlined a poorly-done (forcing the section into code layout), unnecessary numbered list into the sentence it was properly part of. John Darrow (talk) 18:44, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

why vandalism it is
It was conversational —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.83.75 (talk) 19:18, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!
For reverting the vandalism on my userpage?-- Giants27 : Chat  22:30, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanx!
For reverting the nonsense on my talk page, and above all for your decent work and watchful eye! Best regards, --Catgut (talk) 22:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * You're most welcome! Alansohn (talk) 00:14, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Dodge SRT-4 vandalism
Hi, In regards to your edit for the Dodge SRT4 hood scoop, I feel you are mistaken. You believe it is functional, but do you have a source? We can argue the rear wing is functional as well... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Exploringonions (talk • contribs)
 * The issue is not the hood scoop. It's the edit that changed Curt Simmons to Richard Simmons that is vandalism. Alansohn (talk) 00:14, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Origin of romanians
hello and tank you for the message you left me on the talk page. i would like to inform that originally i did give a proper explanation for why i removed the content however my original edit was reverted by a more misinformed user who did not know the content was misleading and as such the edit that you deleted was just my reversion of the respective user's edit (pretty confusing, huh?), and there is a topic in talk page regarding the respective content since last month. while i appreciate the you doing your part to help improve wikipedia i would like to give you a friendly piece of advice: please check the discussion page and the edit history before randomly reverting edits. thank you very much for your time and have a nice weekend.Adijarca (talk) 07:15, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Polycap
Hello Alansohn. Your reasonable start for this article has been overtaken by new contributors who may not yet be familiar with our standards. Someone has begun a discussion at WP:COIN about the editing of. If you have any time yourself, I wonder if you feel like pruning out any of the excessive material? (bold text, etc.) There might be a copyvio in there, judging from the language used. EdJohnston (talk) 15:43, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Non Sibi Sed Patriae
please explain the reason for changing "Non Sibi Sed Patriae", is not what Wikipedia represents, a tool to build upon with a strong focus on historical reality. --PietroSavo (talk) 04:31, 4 April 2009 (UTC) Pietro

Some new people from the last few days

 * Emory Elliott
 * George Stoddard
 * Dorothy Kelly (educator)
 * Frances Blaisdell
 * William Schwartz (physician)

I think I also ran across an interesting one that you'd created and added a reference or something. Bongo matic  06:15, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Chad Smith and Wilma Mankiller
Hi - I saw that you have dealt with POV problems with the articles for Chad "Corntassel" Smith and Wilma Mankiller in the past, so I was wondering if you could provide any guidance for the new wave of John Cornsilk-style defamation provided by User:Skeele. Thanks for any help. -Uyvsdi (talk) 22:02, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Uyvsdi
 * These articles are out of my core competency, but I will take a look. Alansohn (talk) 22:58, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much! It's just a matter of clarifying Wikipedia rules about living people and POV policies. -Uyvsdi (talk) 23:08, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Uyvsdi
 * I think I overreacted. Thought it was going to be this ongoing struggle, as Wikipedia has seen in the past on these articles. Cheers, -Uyvsdi (talk) 17:51, 4 April 2009 (UTC)Uyvsdi

DYK for Arthur Richman
Number 439 (312 create/expand - 127 nominations)

RE: WP:NJ thanks
Not a problem; I am quite happy to be using my interest in New Jersey politics for the benefit of Wikipedia. I also sincerely appreciate the DYK nomination and your addition of other facts to James Beach. I look forward to further collaboration with you on WP:NJ articles. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 17:56, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Recent edit to the page Polygamy
This is regarding your message at User talk:75.72.217.46 regarding this edit to the page Polygamy. I am obviously new to editing and while reading the article came across a typo so thought of fixing that. I did not give a detailed description as the fix was self evident but after getting a message from Tiderolls I re-edited and this time I gave a detailed edit description. But now I notice that the page has been reverted and I am given a warning. I would appreciate if you could could look into the page and see for yourself that I was just trying to fix an error. Cheers :) Umnmathtutor (talk) 03:03, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism?
WHAT VANDALISM ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT SIR? I ONLY EDITED THE DICTION OF THE ARTICLE -- WHICH WAS LACKING! I SUGGEST YOU TAKE THAT OFF OF MY PAGE AND DISCONTINUE THE SLANDER. THANK YOU AND GOOD DAY. Ilovenc123 (talk) 19:56, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

But
My other edits were a mistake that I did not mean to make. North Carolina is a very urban state and I thought the article was wrong -- what about cities like Charlotte, Greensboro, and Raleigh? ARE THOSE RURAL??????? I WANT THIS WARNING CORRECTED. Ilovenc123 (talk) 21:44, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Image reversion VIA FP9ARM
There is no reason to revert this image. The image that was added is no different to the one that was originally there, the person who added the second image is obviously just wanting their own images on the page. 67.193.221.128 (talk) 02:57, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Thankyou. I'm guessing that it got your attention because there was no edit summary.  If so the mistake is mine.  I thought I had entered that info but obviously didn't, I seem to have an issue with using Wiki rightnow as I just entered an Edit summary without editing the page. I should pay greater attention to what I am doing.67.193.219.104 (talk) 04:17, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Now I can't log on to my account and have a different IP address? Have you heard of this elsewhere in your experience? 67.193.219.104 (talk) 04:19, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Doris Day
Thanks for that revert. I don't know what it is that was imbedded in the IP change ("AlProxy-Connection: keep-alive" and "Cache-Control: max-age=0") or its purpose, but it looked troublesome to me. Do you have any idea? Wildhartlivie (talk) 18:56, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I have seen it before in vandalistic edits, but I have no idea where it comes from. I will try to research. Alansohn (talk) 04:20, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Please let me know, it seems very weird! Wildhartlivie (talk) 23:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Jacob B Agus
I did not create the article Jacob B Agus, but an admin deleted it this morning and I rescued it, rewrote it, and recreated it. Can you spend a few minutes and help wikify and clean it up?--Jayrav (talk) 19:38, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I was also surprised. --Jayrav (talk) 14:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Some more

 * Eva Evdokimova
 * Jorge Preloran
 * John Blankenchip
 * http://www.latimes.com/news/obituaries/la-me-richard-oneill5-2009apr05,0,2602055.story

Bongo matic  06:30, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

But wait, there's more! Bongo matic
 * Jerome R. Waldie
 * Rocco Morabito
 * James G. Boswell II
 * ...Now how much would I pay??? Thanks for the updates. I need to catch up on obits, and will do so ASAP. Alansohn (talk) 05:40, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

New message!
Control-alt-delete ★ user◾talk◾favs 15:03, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

New message!
Control-alt-delete ★ user◾talk◾favs 19:35, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

New message!
Control-alt-delete ★ user◾talk◾favs 20:34, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Autism
Did you not read the reference? And I quote: "a DSM-IV diagnosis of Asperger's disorder is unlikely or impossible.". Hoax. Plain and simple. Please read the details before calling controversial papers "vandalism" if there is a lack of scientific consensus then perhaps it shouldn't be on Wikipedia at all. In case you didn't see it the first time, also provides a layman's introduction. 129.97.134.80 (talk) 22:52, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * While you are quoting a reference to support your claim, the article I read does not use the word "hoax" or claim it as such. The article questions the diagnostic criteria established by DSM-IV for Asperger's. If you are going to expunge any mentions of Asperger's or refer to it as a hoax, you will need to rebut the thousands of other articles that treat it as a rather real condition. Do not remove any content without discussing it first on the talk page. Alansohn (talk) 23:58, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Ferris Beuller's Day Off in popular culture merge discussion
Informing everyone who participated in the AFD for Ferris Beuller's Day Off in popular culture that a merge discussion is now underway concerning the same material. Please share your comments here  D r e a m Focus  04:11, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

DYK twofer
Number 440-441 (314 create/expand - 127 nominations)

Fruity
why did you change fruity >=( fruity is a word. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beast778899 (talk • contribs)
 * I don't see any change about the word "fruity". It's the rest of your vandalism that's been a problem. Alansohn (talk) 11:47, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Gurumayi Chidvilasananda
Also, you seem to know the ropes within the wikipedia. I submit you another case, theringess is again and again suppressing any independent material about Gurumayi Chidvilasananda including the transcriptiion of an article of the new yorker. Please study the history of the article. 82.67.232.89 (talk)

You can join me at cognominal@gmail.com
 * I'm not sure how much I can help, but I will look. Alansohn (talk) 11:47, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Otisjimmy1
Thanks, for reverting that vandalism from my page. Best, otisjimmy1 (talk) 04:02, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It's the least I could do! Alansohn (talk) 18:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Nasal irrigation
Just to make sure you don't get into an edit war under false assumptions. The IP you just warned for removing sourced content is a static one who regularly removes questionable content that is always being added by the same COI SPA. See my "Note for vandal fighters" on the IP's talk page. --Hans Adler (talk) 15:31, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up. The content removed seemed more than plausible and the lack of an edit summary coming from an IP editor made it appear as vandalism. With subsequent edits to the article, I now understand why the content was removed. Alansohn (talk) 15:33, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It's a strange situation. The content looks more than plausible, but Grockl has in the past been making claims that are totally over the top, so I tend to err on the side of caution and decline to accept anything without bulletproof sourcing. --Hans Adler (talk) 18:52, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi!
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my talk page! Long time no talk. I hope all is well. Wishing you a חג כשר ושמח!  shirulashem     (talk)   00:35, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Free Speech
free speech dingdong, its the talk page —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.171.186.242 (talk) 03:36, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Polycap
Number 442 (315 create/expand - 127 nominations)

DYK for Gus Cifelli
Number 443 (316 create/expand - 127 nominations)

DYK for H. Clay Earles
Number 444 (317 create/expand - 127 nominations)

86.171.224.204
This IP recieved an level 3 warning before he replaced it with gibberish, please review page history(I ususally do when encountering a blank/nonsense IP talk page). Happy vandal hunting. Gsmgm (talk) 14:27, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Frankie Campbell
I'm sorry but I am confused as to why my edit wasn't viewed as constructive...? 169.244.116.11 (talk) 16:57, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Sources show that he had a record of 33-4-2 as shown in the article, but your edit changed it a record of 730-4-2 in 736 fights. This is blatant vandalism, and is far from the first time you have vandalized articles. Alansohn (talk) 17:04, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


 * If you were paying attention, you'd realize that this is a school IP, and that was merely a classmate's vandalism, not mine. I don't appreciate you reverting my constructive post concerning Frankie Campbell's early life in Bath, Maine. Please do not revert it again. 169.244.116.11 (talk) 17:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Orlady RfA
Thought you might want to know about Orlady's Request for adminship. Kaldari (talk) 17:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009 block
Alansohn, I've blocked you for 31 hours for violation of your editing restrictions. You've recently been uncivil to other editors at a number of recent CfD and CfD-related discussions, including most recently, , ,. Judging by your past comments to me about the editing restrictions you've been placed under, I can understand that you will probably not view this block as legitimate. Anyone can be misunderstood a few times and appear to be uncivil when no incivility was intended, but you're exhibiting the same pattern of behavior that originally led to the restrictions and the subsequent blocks. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:04, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * These admittedly trenchant remarks of Alansohn's seem to me to fall within the usual 'cut and thrust' of cfds. I've been called worse myself (usually by Otto) in cfds in the last few weeks. And he is now benefitting only Dunkin' Donuts franchise-holders. I appeal for clemency on his behalf. Occuli (talk) 19:05, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Diva Zappa
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Diva Zappa, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I suggested over a fortnight ago that I didn't feel that Zappa was notable enough to have her own Wiki page and used the notability tag. No-one has made any effort in establishing notability and when I have searched for her on Google, I found little that suggested anything other than very minor claims for notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fol de rol troll (talk) 21:23, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Personal Urban Mobility and Accessibility
Number 445 (318 create/expand - 127 nominations)

level 3 warning?
I apologize for whatever I did to offend you. I was just trying to clean up various pages of university presidents. I'm not sure what part was problematic, but I apologize. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sassy Sylvia (talk • contribs) 02:23, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Whatever your interest, you can have her! I'll stay clear of her.

Sassy Sylvia (talk) 02:32, 17 April 2009 (UTC)sylviaSassy Sylvia (talk) 02:32, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

CfD
Thank you for bring that to my attention! Keep again!  C T J F 8 3 Talk 06:13, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

DYK for 1963 Liberty Bowl
Number 446 (319 create/expand - 127 nominations)

Johnny Mercer
Thanks for your contribution to the category deletionmerge nomination, I chose Mercer, because he is a significant person and have never hidden the fact this a quite a minefield. I have put a note on the people who created these articles, also over at the songs project. Don't know what else to do to get a discussion and concensus going. It is further complicated by different eras viewing the sub-division of songwriting credits differently. --Richhoncho (talk) 15:30, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Brian Jarod Smart
How do you submit someone for vandalization of a site. Regarding the Brian J Smart page, it has become clear that the person at the IP 24.2.95.62 is related to the case and trying to hide his or her involvment. Can Wiki block the access of this IP from future edits?

4waldopepper  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4waldopepper (talk • contribs) 18:39, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Yom HaShoah
I just added some material to Dan Pagis It still needs work. Perhaps we could add some of his poems and do a Do You Know? for Yom HaShoah. This is his most widely-cited poem:

Dan Pagis –  Written In Pencil in the Sealed Railway Car

...כאן במשלוח הזה

here in this carload

אני חוה

i am eve

עם הבל בני...

with abel my son

אם תראו את בני קין,

if you see my other son

בן אדם,

cain son of man

תגידו לו שאני...

tell him i...Historicist (talk) 19:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I hope all is well with you and that you had an enjoyable chag. I wish I had known about this and would have done this for Holocaust Memorial Day. I will do my best to expand the article. Alansohn (talk) 13:24, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Data mining
Y'know, it might be nice if somebody explained to the poor guy why his edits keep getting reverted. I just tried to do so, but got an edit conflict with you. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:02, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * On the other hand, if he doesn't pay any attention to what's on his talk page, what more can one do. (rhetorical question). Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 12:42, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Jay Cutler
Why thank you!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rstebob (talk • contribs) 02:31, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Reverting everything i add?
What is up with you? your like a wikinazi, i cant add anything or fix any typo without you reverting itMuffinman991 (talk) 20:01, 12 April 2009 (UTC) Muffinman991 (talk) 20:01, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Try adding legitimate content. All else will be removed. Alansohn (talk) 20:01, 12 April 2009 (UTC)you're like a wikinazi...seconded
 * I agree with user:Muffinman991, correcting typos and minor edits should not be problematic. And when someone adds something, then has to step to the bathroom, so they save it, you should at least give them a few minutes to finish their editing. --Never give up! Never surrender! (talk) 20:02, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks a bunch for reverting that vandalism on my userpage! 

Oldlaptop321 (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Oldlaptop321 (talk) 12:20, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the cookie! Alansohn (talk) 21:05, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Michael Stern (journalist)
Number 447 (320 create/expand - 127 nominations)

Why are you breaking what I fix?
I made appropriate CONSTRUCTIVE changes to the page TWICE and you reverted them to their incorrect version TWICE. Are you a veteran? Do you know anything about military rank insignia? If not, leave the changes alone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.175.134.36 (talk) 04:27, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Timothy Holst
Hi Alansohn


 * Nightlife in Ulaanbaatar is for the most part restricted to the hotels, and thus reserved for foreigners and the few Mongolians, in one way or another, to get past the doormen. The best-attended bar is in the Ulaanbaatar Hotel, which is the city's largest hostelry. This bar opens at 10 p.m. and it accepts only American paper money; since a can of imported beer is a dollar and a half, there is a problem about change. in lieu of Silver, patrons receive packets of bubble gum. While I was there, the patrons included a BBC television crew, several print journalists, foreign diplomats, staff members of United Nations agencies, circus talent scouts, oil prospectors, an investment banker from London, a British agronomist, an American Peace Corps official, a South Korean highway engineer, a Dutch veterinarian, two English trekkers, an American promoter of outdoor-advertising signs, and hunters of both the rifle and the bow-and-arrow variety.

&mdash;

Bongo matic  13:44, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

December 2017
Let's make something perfectly clear: you started a discussion that asked "Is Yahoo Sports a reliable source?" You didn't start a discussion that asked "Should this tertiary source from the Yahoo Sports High School blog be used instead of the secondary source that it points out and links to?" If you start an RfC on that, it will be relevant to the edit that you're now trying to force on the Millville High School article. If you don't know how to start an RfC that's that specfic, let me know and I'll be happy to start it for you. Thanks. Rockypedia (talk) 17:39, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * , every participant saw your argument and rejected it. The source is reliable and verifiable, and supports the claim being made. It's time to move on as you appear to be living up to your reputation. Alansohn (talk) 17:41, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * This is a lie. Nobody rejected my argument that the tertiary source is redundant. You put forth a premise that I was arguing that all of Yahoo Sports was not a reliable source, which was a lie. I was pointing out the the source was a blog piece and only linked to a reliable secondary source. You set up the straw man, and when I pointed out that I wasn't saying all of Yahoo was not a reliable source, you conveniently ignored that. No one has commented on your use of a blog as a source, because you never asked that question. Set up a real RfC and then get consensus, and your edit will be valid. However, I think you already know what would happen, because that's the reason you set up the straw man discussion in the first place. Rockypedia (talk) 17:48, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * The argument was made by you that a blog at Yahoo Sports can't be reliable; that argument has been summarily rejected. I see that you have done nothing other than delete articles and disrupt content. Try doing something productive and learn how to be a useful editor. Maybe another WP:ANI case might be more successful. Alansohn (talk) 17:53, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Again, you're lying. I made the argument that that particular blog post was not considered a reliable secondary source, because it's a blog post AND because it merely points to the reliable secondary source, with no research of its own. Why you're insisting on including it would be baffling, except that after dealing with you over this one edit, and being contacted by other editors that you've bludgeoned into submission, I'm pretty sure it's only about WP:WINNING at this point for you. Unfortunately, in this case the source is not as good as the secondary source that's already there, so there's no reason for it to be there. Rockypedia (talk) 18:05, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Again, you're living up to your reputation. While your first approach was a failed attempt to WP:ANI, I went to WP:RSN, raised the issue, heard from multiple uninvolved parties, saw your issues directly rebutted and responded to that consensus. I put the source into the article in the first place because it addressed a specific claim and I reinserted it on that basis and based on the consensus reached at WP:RSN.If you believe your own bullshit about my "lying" -- as you've claimed on several separate occasions in separate violations of WP:NPA -- start another case at WP:ANI. If you believe that you have a case above and beyond the one that was rejected at WP:RSN, start an RfC, but be forewarned that you will be hit directly by claims that you're forum shopping.The choice is yours, but I hope that you will stop edit warring. Alansohn (talk) 21:15, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Re: Jeremy Glick: Saddle River or Upper Saddle River
Hey, there does seem to be some discrepancy between sources, however, I found this one: which states Glick was born in NYC and raised in Oradell, NJ, and says he attended the Saddle River day school. I also found this which also states Oradell as a location he grew up in (not 100% sure if it's credible). If there are conflicting sources then perhaps the information should not be included until we find various sources that are consistent with one another. What do you think? Tinton5 (talk) 21:00, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
 * , thanks for the original edit to Jeremy Glickand for the additional research. It could be Oradell *or* Saddle River *or* Upper Saddle River, but it could be more than one of the above. No source appears superior, so we should try to reflect the totality of the sources. Alansohn (talk) 23:27, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 25
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 25, October – November 2017

 Arabic, Korean and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta! Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * OAWiki & #1Lib1Ref
 * User Group update
 * Global branches update
 * Spotlight: Research libraries and Wikimedia
 * Bytes in brief

Guild of Copy Editors December 2017 News
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Civility
As I've said before, I have no problem with you voicing your opinion, but the constant incivility, condescension, assumption of bad faith, and now profanity has got to stop. You don't own Wikipedia WP:OWNERSHIP and should be familiar with WP:Civility--Rusf10 (talk) 20:02, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 * , in this edit at Articles for deletion/Bill Zanker you made the rather explicitly abusive threat that "I have now noticed that both you and the subject of the article live in the same town. And to be honest with you, the article List of people from Teaneck, New Jersey should not exist and neither should about half the articles on that list." Now you're shamelessly violating WP:HARASS by following through on that threat, starting with mayors and now working through other people on the exact same list you've targeted in your threat. If you think that trying to delete articles merely because the person has come connection to a place that I have connection to is not in and of itself a violation of the basic norms of WP:CIVILITY you are far more screwed up than I ever imagined. Stay the hell of my talk page and get a life that doesn't involve rather disturbing stalking. Alansohn (talk) 20:12, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Seasons' Greetings
...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:11, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
 * , and best wishes to you from the Great White North (of New Jersey). Wishing you a year of success in 2018. Alansohn (talk) 08:42, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Mode share articles
Hi Alansohn:

The more I think about it, the more I think putting New York metro data in the Newark article is just wrong. I hope you don't mind if I ask a favor. I would like to know about any recent secondary sources on mode share if you run across them. thanks, Oldsanfelipe (talk) 19:09, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I've seen such data in the past and I've been trying to search for it myself since I left the message for you on your talk page. Thanks for the note and for your additions on this topic. Alansohn (talk) 19:14, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

John Renna
When you are free can you add the image from https://www.newspapers.com/clip/16115706/john_pasquale_renna_jr_may_19_1920/ to his article under a fair use license? I can only add images to Wikimedia. --RAN (talk) 18:59, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Will do, when I can. Looks like a productive source. Alansohn (talk) 23:46, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

I haven't clipped it yet, do you have access to Newspapers.com? https://www.newspapers.com/image/222785307/?terms=Andrew%2B%2BRuotolo for Andrew K. Ruotolo, when you have time. --RAN (talk) 05:03, 31 December 2017 (UTC) Here is the clipped version, which you should be able to see: https://www.newspapers.com/clip/16133528/andrew_keogh_ruotolo_jr_november_5/, I will also add it to Familysearch, and add the link to Familysearch at Wikidata. Familysearch also allows fair use content. --RAN (talk) 14:03, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't have access to Newspapers.com, which has many sources in that intermediate, pre-Internet / competitive newspaper era of the type that would establish broad notability for many of the subjects we're dealing with. Depending on finding sources only on what can be Googled leaves people who made their marks in the 1950s to 1970s harder to source. I will upload the Renna source later this morning.Keep up the great work on expanding articles. The best response to rampant deletionism isn't voting keep at an AfD, it's adding the sources that show a topic is notable and convinces others. Alansohn (talk) 12:56, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people from Cherry Hill, New Jersey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matt Bush ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_people_from_Cherry_Hill%2C_New_Jersey check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_people_from_Cherry_Hill%2C_New_Jersey?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Peter A. Appel AfD Discussion
Alansohn, Thanks for your note. I’m struggling to justify spending the time required to be a useful contributor. My initial experience in the Appel AfD discussion was very frustrating. I clearly made some rookie mistakes but was taken aback by the condescension and hypocrisy of some of the editors I encountered. And the decision to delete, when no consensus was the obvious call, just highlighted for me how subjective and random these decisions are, particularly when they are close. Not sure I want to participate in a system where the rules are so ambiguous and so many of the other participants have their own agendas and biases. Bernice McCullers (talk) 01:02 3 January 2018 —Preceding undated comment added 06:03, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * , having a connection to one and only one Wikipedia article is a very two-edged sword. You feel strongly about the article, but what happens to it feels personal. The broader your editing interests, the more satisfying editing can be and the less it feels that anything that happens to the article is an attack on you. Takes it easy, look around and find some broader areas of interest. Let me know what I can do to help.

High Point Regional High School
Hi, could you please explain this edit? Correcting mistakes doesn't constitute interference. And the point of sic is to mark something in quoted text as being an accurate quotation and therefore not to be 'corrected'. But this instance is not in quoted text at all. — Smjg (talk) 13:09, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Correcting mistakes? Where is there a mistake? Alansohn (talk) 17:38, 2 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Exactly where you added one. I don't understand your question.  Moreover, you made that edit, so regardless you must know why you did it. — Smjg (talk) 18:01, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't understand your statement that you are "correcting mistakes". What mistake are you correcting? I'm looking through the entire article and I don't see anythng that needs to be corrected. In this case, you made that edit, so regardless you must know why you did it. Alansohn (talk) 18:47, 2 January 2018 (UTC)


 * What are you talking about? The edit I posted a link to is one that you made.  And it shows the mistake you added quite clearly.  If it wasn't you, it would appear that someone else has gained access to your user account. — Smjg (talk) 22:27, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I keep on looking at the edit that I made and I still see no mistake. What mistake are you talking about? If you are "correcting mistakes", why not state what the mistake is that you believe you are correcting. Alansohn (talk) 01:32, 3 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Two things:
 * The phrase "comprised of" is incorrect. OK, so this is disputed, but it's much better to use language that is undisputedly correct.
 * You used sic for something that isn't in a quotation.
 * Furthermore, I didn't feel the need to go redundantly into the specifics here, as you could see what was changed by viewing the diff page. And the basic question I asked is why you made the edit.  Whether you think it's a mistake or not is irrelevant to this question.  Also, what on earth do you mean by "avoid copy editing interference"? — Smjg (talk) 18:52, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * , the basic question is why *you* have made the edit. Reviewing your user page, it's apparent that the issue is that you -- based on your personal beliefs and quaint local dialect -- believe that the term "comprised of" is a "mistake". Here in the United States, we don't believe that to be the case. We proudly state that "the United States is comprised of 50 states" and sometimes extend "comprised of" as a warm greeting to friends, neighbors (never "neighbours") and other various and sundry passersby. In the UK variant of the common language that divides us, you use spellings such as "kerb" and "centre", while Americans write "curb" and "center". Per WP:ENGVAR, it's inappropriate to impose these changes on an article, especially where there is a strong national connection. As the schools here are firmly anchored in the soil of the United States and as there is no objection to the use of "comprised of" here in his country (perhaps due to the far lower levels of grammar prigs who believe that it is wrong to split infinitives, dangle a participle and other such nanny state prescriptivism), I see no reason to treat uses of "comprised of" as a "mistake". I'm guessing that Lynne Truss would be 100% on your side, but that support should be limited to articles where a strong UK connection exists. I can assure you that I won't be updating UK-based articles and inserting "comprised of"; I hope that you will observe the same effort to avoid copy editing interference. Alansohn (talk) 19:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Are you saying the "be made up of" meaning of "comprise" doesn't exist in US English? It does according to most if not all the OneLook listings. On this basis, the first subsection of the section you've referred me to applies, so your edit is the inappropriate one. — Smjg (talk) 23:59, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tony Nicodemo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jump shot ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Tony_Nicodemo check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Tony_Nicodemo?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

MOS:NUMS, WP:SELFPUB
Hello Alansohn -- Last night I started getting a bot-edit as I was publishing articles. It would, apparently, check for references with the same base URL as the subject. I either had to edit the article, or confirm that they were to stay in. Most of what I edited out were claims that would have been troublesome to verify elsewise, to wit: "best in the state" and similar claims.

As to MOS:NUMS, it appears you want me to use AP style: spell zero to nine and use digits for others. I prefer the Chicago style: zero to one hundred. It appears that MOS:NUMS allows the spelling of any two-word number. All numbers zero to one hundred can be described in two words or less. I hope that is okay with you. Thanks for watching out for me. Rhadow (talk) 15:48, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * , I agree that you have to be careful for promotional claims sourced to the article's subject, but the nature of the details included here meet the criteria of WP:SELFPUB; I am curious to know what bot is detecting these references with the same base URL as the subject. Numbers from 10 to 99 *can* be spelled out using words per MOS:NUMS and I would support writing out numbers in articles where the details are being added. However, there appears to be no reason to change two-digit values from numbers to words in cases where there is a consistent standard that already exists within an article. Alansohn (talk) 16:17, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

When I see it again, I'll take notes. Rhadow (talk) 16:32, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christ the King Preparatory School (New Jersey), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Our Lady of Good Counsel High School ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Christ_the_King_Preparatory_School_%28New_Jersey%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Christ_the_King_Preparatory_School_%28New_Jersey%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Shanique Speight
Hello! Your submission of Shanique Speight at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:45, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Come on
Alansohn, you know there is no way this edit summary is true, and I'm disappointed you think you can pull the wool over my eyes in this way. "Integral part" is horse shit, and you know it. Drmies (talk) 20:53, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * , please allow me to return the favor of a reply to your horse shit that "'Integral part' is horse shit, and you know it.".If, as in this edit, you believe that the classic novel A Tree Grows in Brooklyn set in Williamsburg is "trivial", that is horse shit. If by that edit you meant that it (and other easily sourced content) must be deleted because it was "unverified", you have never read WP:PRESERVE and that too is horse shit. If you believe that changing citation formats doesn't violate WP:CITEVAR,again, horse shit. If, as in this edit, you believe that brief quotations included in references must be removed, more horse shit. If you believe that this edit with a meaningless one-word edit summary of "more" in which thousands of characters of brief quotations were removed is justified by policy, yet more horse shit. If you believe that Template:Cite_news doesn't include a quote parameter that is designed and intended to display "Relevant text quoted from the source" and that is used in tens of thousands of Wikipedia articles as an "integral part" of our encyclopedia, we are dealing with steaming mounds of horse shit.If you are a Wikipedia administrator and believe that you have some privileged access to my thoughts and can be arrogant enough to believe as in the above edit that it is acceptable to violate WP:NPA, that is total horse shit. Feel free to refactor your horse shit comments above and start a mature and productive conversation on the topic at the article's talk page and get consensus for your position that brief quotations must be removed from references. Alansohn (talk) 21:21, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah, if no secondary sources make hay of the fact that this or that novel is set in this or that place, it's trivial at least for our purposes. Have a great day, Drmies (talk) 23:38, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Heinie Benkert
Gatoclass (talk) 14:03, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Morris Hills High School
Please look carefully at the prank text you restored. Rather than slap the kids around, I just quietly made some changed. Rhadow (talk) 00:37, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * , thanks for the catch. I corrected the error and am more than willing to slap the kids around (in a metaphorical sense). Alansohn (talk) 01:33, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 23
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * 2018 McDonald's All-American Boys Game ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/2018_McDonald%27s_All-American_Boys_Game check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/2018_McDonald%27s_All-American_Boys_Game?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added links pointing to New Albany High School and Oak Hill Academy
 * Williamsburg, Brooklyn ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Williamsburg%2C_Brooklyn check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Williamsburg%2C_Brooklyn?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to A Tree Grows in Brooklyn

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Ocean City, New Jersey
Good afternoon! I saw your edits on the aforementioned page, and you mentioned "updating" some refs. I'm curious why you formatted it the way you did, when I already had it as or. That being said, I'm also wondering if you have any resources on the city that could help, as I'm interested in improving the article, which will be my first for a city in NJ. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 21:03, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
 * While I appreciate this edit updating the city council members, I didn't appreciate you changing the format of the reference. I intend to improve this article in the future to become a Good article, if not featured article, and for that, the citations need to be in Template:Cite web format. That being said, I do see you editing the city article a lot. Would you like to collaborate on any articles city-related? I have updated City Hall recently, I intend to write an article about the Music Pier, maybe the Boardwalk. What do you think? I also have an article that's under construction for List of mayors of Ocean City, New Jersey. Do you have any information on any of the missing mayors? ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 02:17, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * , there is so much work that could be done on the topics that you've listed and I hope to be able to help you collaboratively with that effort. I've been involved with other GA efforts, where there were no changes needed to citation formats. The changes to citation format conflict with WP:CITEVAR and should be unnecessary, even for GA status. If they are indeed required, they should probably be the last changes made, rather than the first, with the focus being on adding content and sourcing any material that needs referencing. I should certainly be able to help with mayors. Let me know what I can do to help.I notice that I had not replied to your previous message, which seems to have arrived with some other messages that caught my focus before I noticed the previous message. Sorry, but I'm glad that I was finally able to reply, albeit belatedly. Alansohn (talk) 02:42, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply. You're right, I may have violated WP:CITEVAR with my edits, apologies. I thought using the template was a requirement, but it turns out it's not! I'm just used to adding them, so when I was adding content, I went with the citation method I'm used to. It's the citing method I've used for over 10 years, so apologies from this old user for not following the rules. I can change back the citations if you want, or I can continue to convert them over. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 16:03, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * , the general rule seems to be to maintain a consistent citation standard in an article. There's no reason to change them over, unless they're outliers from the prevailing standard, but old habits die hard. If the main focus is on adding and improving content, then we're probably headed in the right direction. Again, let me know if I can help with expansion efforts. Alansohn (talk) 16:14, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks, agreed. I'll check in the Ocean City Library this week to see if I can get the List of Mayors page completed. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 16:16, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Also, I didn't want to start a new thread for this, but I saw User:Alansohn/New Jersey municipalities in alpha order. I wanted to point out that Princeton borough and township merged. I wasn't sure if that list was more historical or not. I appreciate all of the work you have done for New Jersey articles! ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 23:04, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I created that back in 2011, I think related to Census data. I'm not sure that I need it for much else, but the Princetons are merged everywhere else, especially where it matters. Alansohn (talk) 23:07, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
Your recent editing history at Mater Dei High School (New Jersey)‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 15:25, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * , my recent edit history shows that I've added sources to address concerns raised by previous editors about content that his been in the article for almost seven years; your recent edit history shows that you simplyrefusing to address the issues raised about failing to comply with WP:BRD. Yur patently bad faith claim of "edit warring" only undermines any credibility or legitimacy that you might have at this article. If you won't discuss issues and prefer to do your edit warring via template, you accomplish nothing. If you want to discuss the issue, head to the article's talk page. The conversation is over here if this is the best you can do to legitimize the removal of sourced content without discussion. Alansohn (talk) 15:31, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * It's not a bad faith claim, you're at 3RR. BRD isn't even a guideline. I've raised the general issue at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools. That it happened isn't a reason to include it in the school's article unless there is evidence that the school was at fault. And you haven't shown that.  Doug Weller  talk 15:41, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Mount Olivet Cemetery, Newark for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mount Olivet Cemetery, Newark is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mount Olivet Cemetery, Newark until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 15:44, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Hell's Kitchen, Manhattan
Hi Alansohn, when you reverted an unsourced claim to Hell's Kitchen, Manhattan, you also reverted my edit removing an out-of-place sentence. I discussed it on the article's talk page. Did you mean to revert this also? Leschnei (talk) 03:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * , I hadn't intended to reinsert that material. That was unintended. Alansohn (talk) 03:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll take it back out. Leschnei (talk) 13:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 26
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 26, December – January 2018  Arabic and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
 * # 1Lib1Ref
 * User Group update
 * Global branches update
 * Spotlight: What can we glean from OCLC’s experience with library staff learning Wikipedia?
 * Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Walter M. D. Kern
Gatoclass (talk) 05:52, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Shanique Speight
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:52, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Austin Scott (Rutgers), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Bancroft ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Austin_Scott_%28Rutgers%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Austin_Scott_%28Rutgers%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Joseph Stamler
Hello! Your submission of Joseph Stamler at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:35, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Evelyn Terhune
Hello! Your submission of Evelyn Terhune at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:55, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Esther E. Baldwin
Hello. Why did you revert my edit where I added Esther E. Baldwin to the Marlton, New Jersey page in the Notable People section? She was born in the town, and I included a ref to a RS. --Rosiestep (talk) 23:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * , my sincere apologies. A slip of my finger to revert a different article accidentally reverted your change to the Marlton article. Within a minute, the accidental edit was self reverted. Alansohn (talk)
 * Perfect. All is well. :) --Rosiestep (talk) 23:45, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

February 21: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

some minor problems with your DYK nomination, please discuss
Hello! Your submission of Michael_F._Adubato at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --Farang Rak Tham (talk) 14:23, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * You might want to take a look at the hook, before they remove it...-- Farang Rak Tham   (Talk) 15:27, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Joseph Stamler
Alex Shih (talk) 00:03, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of James F. Lacey for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James F. Lacey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/James F. Lacey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 05:30, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Meteor III (yacht)
Thanks for the review on my nomination for Meteor III. Does it need a green tick mark in front of your review so the Promotor can find it. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:31, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Dennis Levinson for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dennis Levinson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dennis Levinson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 18:47, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Tenafly, New Jersey
I nominated it for a GA, and it was reverted as I am not a significant contributor to the article. You are. Do you think it's ready to be a GA?  Vermont &#124; reply here  10:17, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * , the article needs to be fleshed out substantially to be GA-ready. I'm happy to work on that. Alansohn (talk) 15:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I'd like to work with you on that. Do you have IRC?  Vermont &#124; reply here  15:49, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Lois A. Cuccinello for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lois A. Cuccinello is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lois A. Cuccinello until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 23:53, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Evelyn Terhune
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Gerry P. Little for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gerry P. Little is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gerry P. Little until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 04:39, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Welcome back?!?!
I hope that you're back editing. There's so much to do from helping me download 2010 Census data for ZCTAs to expanding articles in the area to help combat a rather toxic wave of deletionism. I hope that your recent edits are the start of your return and not just a quick visit. I look forward to hearing from you. Alansohn (talk) 04:34, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * No sneaking in here for a quick edit, eh?! Haha, I'm not really back. But I can try to help with the ZCTAs.  What do you need?  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 05:04, 23 February 2018 (UTC)°
 * , I'd love to be able to create the same template data for New Jersey ZCTAs to correspond to the same 2010 Census data we created for municipalities and CDPs. Any thoughts? Alansohn (talk) 05:11, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I think we're talking about the spreadsheet linked here. I'm trying to remember where exactly this was generated. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 07:22, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Griggstown Cow
Do you think it's worth contesting the closing admin's decision in this AFD? I'm fairly sure there are more reliable sources about this topic than those that were discussed there, but I no longer live in New Jersey, so I can't easily find sources about local topics there anymore. If I'm going to contest this deletion I think I'd need your help demonstrating that the topic is notable. --Captain Occam (talk) 09:15, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of James Gallagher (American politician) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Gallagher (American politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/James Gallagher (American politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 05:39, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

GOCE February 2018 news
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Maurice Fitzgibbons for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maurice Fitzgibbons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Maurice Fitzgibbons until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 03:01, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of David L. Ganz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David L. Ganz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/David L. Ganz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 03:14, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Bruce James for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bruce James is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bruce James until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 03:21, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of County executives of Atlantic County, New Jersey for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article County executives of Atlantic County, New Jersey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/County executives of Atlantic County, New Jersey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 21:40, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Doreen McAndrew DiDomenico for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Doreen McAndrew DiDomenico is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Doreen McAndrew DiDomenico until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 03:25, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

AN/I
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Prince of Thieves (talk) 15:58, 28 February 2018 (UTC)


 * You are only involved because I mentioned you, but I understand you to have an interest in the overall issue. Prince of Thieves (talk) 15:58, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Michael F. Adubato
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. With 53 contestants qualifying, the groups for round 2 are slightly smaller than usual, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining users.

Our top scorers in round 1 were:


 * 🇺🇸 Aoba47 led the field with a featured article, 8 good articles and 42 GARs, giving a total of 666 points.
 * 🇩🇪 FrB.TG, a WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points, gained from a featured article and masses of bonus points.
 * 🇮🇳 Ssven2, another WikiCup newcomer, was in third place with 403 points, garnered from a featured article, a featured list, a good article and twelve GARs.
 * 🇺🇸 Ceranthor, 🇮🇳 Numerounovedant, Carbrera, 🇳🇱 Farang Rak Tham and 🇷🇴 Cartoon network freak all had over 200 points, but like all the other contestants, now have to start again from scratch. A good achievement was the 193 GARs performed by WikiCup contestants, comparing very favourably with the 54 GAs they achieved.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) and Vanamonde (talk) 15:27, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * , thanks for the thanks. An oldie, but still a goodie. Alansohn (talk) 20:09, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Essex County, New Jersey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page At large ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Essex_County%2C_New_Jersey check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Essex_County%2C_New_Jersey?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

ARBCOM notice
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Arbitration/Requests/Case and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 17:27, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

DRN notice
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Jzsj (talk) 21:52, 8 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi, amused to find you also weighing in on the alumni reunion procession at Old Ivy, it is, at least, a civil discussion, a welcome relief from uncivil discussions. It made me notice to notice how often I run into you in odd corners of this sprawling project.  Cheers.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:26, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The overlap appears to be increasing. Looking forward to bumping into you again soon. Alansohn (talk) 13:42, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monmouth Mall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A&S ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Monmouth_Mall check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Monmouth_Mall?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Evelyn Adams (lottery winner)
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Interaction ban with user:Rusf10
In accordance with the consensus at ANI (permalink) you are hereby banned from interacting with Rusf10 for six months, subject to the usual exceptions. Thryduulf (talk) 14:28, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the update. Alansohn (talk) 14:33, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Page move?
Wouldn't a more appropriate title be County executives of Atlantic County, New Jersey be County Executive of Atlantic County, New Jersey? Seeing as it is a political position such as Mayor of..., Governor of,? Djflem (talk) 20:47, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
 * , that might well make more sense, the only question is the timing. Alansohn (talk) 16:39, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I yield to your discretion. Meanwhile, would at User:Djflem/CEHC and make changes/suggestions? Needs work. Djflem (talk) 14:49, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * - CEHC is a start, but it needs additional expansion. It's hard to believe that one bitter editor with an axe to grind is pointing a gun that forces the creation of articles like this one. And to think that this all started because I voted to Keep an article he thought should be deleted, to which he did the natural thing by stalking me to my place of residence and starting to delete all articles related to my hometown. Pure spite should never be a reason to delete articles. Sorry that you now have to bear the brunt of this editor's rampage against me and the entire state of New Jersey. Alansohn (talk) 15:27, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry for stalking, I agree with Djflem's title for the page, that the capitalized E looks better. However, if you check the AfD, I've listed a whole bunch of similar pages with different naming conventions and it seems to be lowercase e when plural (executives) and capitalized when singular (Executive), so it's really how you want the page to go, Alansohn. In the end it works both ways, but if is making a page in the same category we should at least have consistency across the NJ pages. S EMMENDINGER  ( talk ) 18:58, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * , I agree on the title and I'd move it once the AfD is closed successfully. Thanks for the suggestion. Alansohn (talk) 21:04, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Along the same theme. User:Djflem/CEBC. Would like to float ths article, but would appreciate feedback (edits if you're inclined}. before doing so. Would like to avoid problems, if you know what I mean.Djflem (talk) 17:45, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
 * , I had been about to create an article along those lines when I saw your draft. I will take another look at the CEBC draft article, but it appears to be as strong, if not stronger, than other such Wikipedia material that has received support from the community. You have my full support to move ahead at your timing. Alansohn (talk) 18:11, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
 * & Alansohn. Bergen County Executive is up. Improvement/wikifying welcome.Djflem (talk) 08:15, 15 March 2018 (UTC)


 * & Alansohn Hudson County Executive is up, needs checking, if you'd be so kind.Djflem (talk) 22:42, 19 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Hudson looks good; I'll make a few tweaks. and, Essex County Executive is now live and would benefit from a few more pairs of eyes. Anyone for Mercer? Or willing to past odds on a backlash? Alansohn (talk) 02:59, 20 March 2018 (UTC)


 * & Alansohn. Went live w/last of series: Mercer County Executive: could likely need some further research/refs, expansion. Question, one linking article on one person is very weak. Do a redirect right away or let it play out?Djflem (talk) 14:33, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Beaches in NJ
Hey I agree with you that the category Beaches of NJ should only contain beaches and Jersey Shore communities should only contain towns. It seems redundant to have them both included. I added those categories just because all other entries were basically filled into the beaches of NJ category but now I think we should remove this from town articles. Tinton5 (talk) 16:37, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
 * , agreed! That's what I would do. Alansohn (talk) 20:27, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Arbitration case request declined
The Arbitration Committee has declined the New Jersey-related AfDs arbitration case request, which you were listed as a party to. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 20:18, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Anthony Watson (skeleton racer)
Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Courses Modules are being deprecated
Hello,

Your account is currently configured with an education program flag. This system (the Courses system) is being deprecated. As such, your account will soon be updated to remove these no longer supported flags. For details on the changes, and how to migrate to using the replacement system (the Programs and Events Dashboard) please see Education noticeboard/Archive 18.

Thank you! Sent by: xaosflux 20:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)


 * processed. — xaosflux  Talk 15:32, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

IBAN Violation
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
 * I don't see any way this is not a violation of your interaction ban. Can you justify it? -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 03:28, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * , the response I made was to Bearcat, with whom there is no interaction ban. If the IBAN means that one editor WP:OWN's every AfD that that editor creates with no opportunity to participate in any manner, I have never seen that condition stated. Alansohn (talk) 05:26, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * , the terms stated above in th Interaction Ban notification state: "The purpose of an interaction ban (IBAN) is to stop a conflict between individuals. A one-way interaction ban forbids one user from interacting with another user. A two-way interaction ban forbids both users from interacting with each other. Although the interaction-banned users are generally allowed to edit the same pages or discussions so long as they avoid each other, they are not allowed to interact with each other. Editors subject to an interaction ban are not permitted to: 1) edit each other's user and user talk pages; 2) reply to each other in discussions; 3) make reference to or comment on each other anywhere on Wikipedia, directly or indirectly; 4) undo each other's edits to any page, whether by use of the revert function or by other means; 5) use the thanks extension to respond to each other's edits." These terms have been and will be complied with. There is no ownership right stated regarding AfDs or any other pages in the terms stated. Alansohn (talk) 05:31, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Your post was clearly a "reply to each other in discussions" because you addressed the arguements for deletion, citing the same page as used to justify deletion by the nom. In my view every post on an AfD is a reply to the nomination. Further the discussion that lead to the IBAN specifically discussed the IBAN would stop you from commenting on Rusf10's AfDs. Since you take such a terribly narrow view of IBAN we shall propose expanding the scope. Legacypac (talk) 06:07, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * }, replying to one editor is replying to one editor. I have not replied nor will I reply to the subject. Alansohn (talk) 07:06, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for violating your interaction ban as detailed here. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me</i> 08:50, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

As to the idea that you can avoid your interaction ban by simply including the name of an editor who's making the same point as Rusf10 in your post, see WP:GAME. --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 08:59, 2 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Making the same point? Rusf nomination was one sentence, Bearcat's reply 189 words in length and involved his interpretation of NPOL. Same point? Yep if you believe a hill in Wales and Mt. Kanchenjunga are the same....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:42, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Category:People from Lebanon, New Jersey has been nominated for discussion
Category:People from Lebanon, New Jersey, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:26, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Manhattan
Manhattan, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AIR<b style="color: green;">corn</b> (talk) 09:30, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Photo of Toys R Us headquarters before it closes?
Hi! Are you close to Wayne, New Jersey? If so, would you mind photographing the Toys R Us HQ at One Geoffrey Way Wayne, NJ 07470? I'd like to include a photo of the HQ in Toys R Us. It may be of the building or of the sign.

Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 19:04, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll do my best to drive by. Alansohn (talk) 15:06, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Books & Bytes - Issue 27
<div style = "color: #936c29; font-size: 4em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif"> The Wikipedia Library <span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">Books & Bytes

Issue 27, February – March 2018 <div style = "margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: .9em"> Arabic, Chinese and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
 * # 1Lib1Ref
 * New collections
 * Alexander Street (expansion)
 * Cambridge University Press (expansion)
 * User Group
 * Global branches update
 * Wiki Indaba Wikipedia + Library Discussions
 * Spotlight: Using librarianship to create a more equitable internet: LGBTQ+ advocacy as a wiki-librarian
 * Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 May newsletter
The second round of the 2018 WikiCup has now finished. Most contestants who advanced to the next round scored upwards of 100 points, but two with just 10 points managed to scrape through into round 3. Our top scorers in the last round were:


 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with three featured articles
 * Iazyges, with nine good articles and lots of bonus points
 * 🇮🇳 Yashthepunisher, a first time contestant, with two featured lists
 * SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with seventeen good topic articles
 * 🇺🇸 Usernameunique, a first time contestant, with fourteen DYKs
 * Muboshgu, a seasoned competitor, with three ITNs and
 * Courcelles, another first time contestant, with twenty-seven GARs

So far contestants have achieved twelve featured articles between them and a splendid 124 good articles. Commendably, 326 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2018 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met; most of the GARs are fine, but a few have been a bit skimpy.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Essex County Executive
Gatoclass (talk) 12:01, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Nice work! Djflem (talk) 12:57, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

WSJ
Take it you've seen WSJ: The 15 People Who Keep Wikipedia’s Editors From Killing Each Other. Djflem (talk) 12:57, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

May 23: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

June 2018 GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:26, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gloucester County, New Jersey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greenwich Township, New Jersey ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Gloucester_County%2C_New_Jersey check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Gloucester_County%2C_New_Jersey?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

== June 20: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC (and Pratt Women Wikipedia Design this Saturday June 16) ==

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Books & Bytes – Issue 28
<div style = "color: #936c29; font-size: 4em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif"> The Wikipedia Library <span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">Books & Bytes

Issue 28, April – May 2018 <div style = "margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: .9em"> Arabic, Chinese, Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
 * # 1Bib1Ref
 * New partners
 * Rock's Backpages
 * Invaluable
 * Termsoup
 * User Group update
 * Global branches update
 * Wikipedia Library global coordinators' meeting
 * Spotlight: What are the ten most cited sources on Wikipedia? Let's ask the data
 * Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 July newsletter
The third round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:


 * Courcelles, a first time contestant, with 1756 points, a tally built largely on 27 GAs related to the Olympics
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three GAs on natural history and astronomy topics
 * SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with a variety of submissions related to transport in the state of Washington

Contestants managed 7 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 120 good articles, 1 good topic, 124 DYK entries, 15 ITN entries, and 132 good article reviews. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 458 GA reviews, in comparison to 244 good articles submitted for review and promoted. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process; several submissions, particularly in abstruse or technical areas, have needed additional work to make them completely verifiable.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk), Vanamonde (talk) 04:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Thursday July 12: Wiki Loves Pride Edit-a-thon @ Jefferson Market Library
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Re: Thanks
Thank you for the kind words Alan! I have to extend my thanks to you for doing tireless editing work that the general public might not notice. My friend's philosophy is, "If not me, then who?" I feel the same philosophy about Wikipedia. Someone will eventually fix up these articles, but there are only so many editors, and so much time. I'm happy to edit articles about my own back yard. I plan on using what I learn from my articles to build a political campaign one day. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 14:05, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Have to chime in, Alan don't kill me, but it really is a pleasure to work with you Alan and improve various pages across NJ. You are a terrific editor here and I thank you very much for all your hard working efforts to make all kinds of improvements to this site. I am in the midst of starting new pages related to NJ, if you are all interested in participating feel free. Hurricaneink I want to thank you for your continuous efforts as well and I hope to collaborate with you improving/creating new pages in the future. Tinton5 (talk) 00:37, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * and, the pleasure is mine. It's a privilege to work with editors like you who work so selflessly, diligently and collaboratively to improve this encyclopedia. Alansohn (talk) 15:25, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Sunday July 29: Annual Wiki-Picnic @ Prospect Park
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

A barnstar for you!

 * , thanks so much for the recognition. Much appreciated. Alansohn (talk) 21:06, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

August GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:25, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

ANI NOTICE
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Rusf10 (talk) 23:38, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Blocked 1 week. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 00:39, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

, gain, the violation was inadvertent and was removed. I got the point and now that I know that the editor is back I will be far more careful. I had spent months checking edit histories of every article I edit to make sure that there is no potential violation. Seeing a lengthy gap, my guard was down and I missed it. I can assure you that I couldn't tell you who had nominated any of the last dozen articles I voted on, even with a gun to my head. I will be far more careful in the future. Alansohn (talk) 00:41, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Alan. I have closed the ANI thread. Your topic ban has been extended indefinitely. Note that you may appeal this at WP:AN in the future, and requesting a standard offer unban (after six months with no violations) would be a good way of going about that. As Rusf10's corresponding topic ban is still set to expire, the community has granted you an exception to allow you to respond to any deletion nominations where you have created or significantly contributed the article in question. In such situations, you will be allowed a single statement of any length as long as it is content-based and not personally directed at Rusf10 in any way. This is not to say that Rusf10 will be allowed to harass or bait you, but if you feel that's happening you'll need to report that at AN or ANI and not violate the terms of the IBAN. See the ANI thread or the updated IBAN at WP:EDRC for details, and let me know if you have any questions. Regards, S warm   ♠  14:16, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 29
<div style = "color: #936c29; font-size: 4em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif"> The Wikipedia Library <span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">Books & Bytes

Issue 29, June – July 2018 <div style = "margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: .9em"> Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
 * New partners
 * Economic & Political Weekly–10 accounts
 * Wikimania
 * Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
 * Global branches update
 * Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

August 29: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

WikiCup 2018 September newsletter
The fourth round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The eight users who made it to the final round had to score a minimum of 422 points to qualify, with the top score in the round being 4869 points. The leaders in round 4 were:


 * Courcelles scored a magnificent 4869 points, with 92 good articles on Olympics-related themes. Courcelles' bonus points alone exceeded the total score of any of the other contestants!
 * Kees08 was second with 1155 points, including a high-scoring featured article for Neil Armstrong, two good topics and some Olympics-related good articles.
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Cas Liber, with 1066 points, was in third place this round, with two featured articles and a good article, all on natural history topics.
 * Other contestants who qualified for the final round were 🇲🇭 Nova Crystallis, Iazyges,  SounderBruce,  🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Kosack and 🇺🇸 Ceranthor.

During round four, 6 featured articles and 164 good articles were promoted by WikiCup contestants, 13 articles were included in good topics and 143 good article reviews were performed. There were also 10 "in the news" contributions on the main page and 53 "did you knows". Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best editor win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:30, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Morristown Municipal Airport
Some content you added to the above article back in January appears to have been copied in part from The New York Times. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, some of the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:15, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * , while I am certain that your claims of copyright violation are false, in your roles as judge, jury and executioner, you have also removed any of the evidence of the alleged crime. Solely based on what I've recalled, this would hardly be the first time that you have taken an absolutist stand on perceived copyright violations in a circumstance where the claim was unjustified. I'm sure that you believe that you are correct, but you leave no mechanism to challenge your alleged thought crimes. Alansohn (talk) 19:23, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Please remove edit
Mr. Sohn, My name is Steve Grayberg. I am working with the Pompton Lakes NJ Mayor and select council members to try to improve the Borough’s on-line presence. According to edit history, you have placed an edit about a specific newspaper series earlier this year on the Wikipedia Pompton Lakes general information page. Having looked at some of your work, we recognize that you are a prolific Wikipedia contributor, and that you mean to improve the information available through this medium.

However, please understand that to most people, placing an edit about a specific newspaper piece in the middle of a general article containing, geography, history and census information, appears more like vandalism, or at least bad faith. We ask that you remove this edit (#27) from that page.

If you feel strongly that the information is needed, then please find a more relevant place for it. Thank you.2601:41:C101:82C0:D12D:AA8A:A696:E246 (talk) 19:24, 11 September 2018 (UTC)Steve Grayberg, Pompton Lakes resident.
 * - Mr. Grayberg, I appreciate your efforts on behalf of the municipality, but you should definitely review the limitations placed by Wikipedia's policy on conflict of interest, which are intended to deal with this exact type of issue relating to the tension of what should be included in an article about a place. I don't see any reason to remove the details regarding contamination, and its health impacts, related to the defunct DuPont facility, and I'm certainly not sure that it would be considered "bad faith", let alone "vandalism", to include the material, which is most certainly encyclopedic. After further consideration, I have moved the material from the lead and placed it in the history section, which includes other details about the plant. Alansohn (talk) 18:06, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Intel Schools of Distinction


The article Intel Schools of Distinction has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This article is clearly a leftover from earlier times. A big corporation gave an education grant for a couple years. No indication of general notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 03:47, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

September 26: WikiWednesday Salon / Wikimedia NYC Annual Meeting
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

User:Doriden edits
Do you think we should report this editor for constant disruptive edits? Tinton5 (talk) 12:41, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * , I think that this editor is incredibly misguided, but I'm not sure what to do next. The failure to communicate makes matters worse, but the edits do seem to be based on reliable information, though I have no idea what the sources are (none are ever provided) or why the editor insists on bizarre formatting (Such As Using All Initial Capitalization). I'm scratching my head, but I'd like to find a way to reach out to this person, correct the issues and turn out a productive editor.I also want to thank you for all of the work you've done adding material, sources and categories. Kudos to you! Alansohn (talk) 16:03, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * My pleasure, and many thanks to you as well for the same things. I have a question, when you added info to Anthony DeAngelo, along with other biographical pages, adding in their hometown of Sewell, part of Washington Twp, Gloucester County...whereas the Sewell page says it is part of Mantua Twp. Should this be corrected as well as proper category placement? I know that Sewell borders Washington Twp, unless the two overlap. Though the Washington Twp page does include Sewell as part of the town. We have a little contradiction here. I just wanted to clarify this. Tinton5 (talk) 02:37, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
 * , I saw that same contradiction. The article for DeAngelo had placed him as being from Sewell, and based on that he had been placed into the category for people from Mantua Township. But the sources for DeAngelo explicitly place him in Sewell and in Washington Township. The Washington Township article lists Sewell as one of the ZIP codes that serves the community. I did my best to find a source (or sources) that places Sewell as covering both Mantua and Washington Township, but I have been unable to do so (though I did find a letter to the editor that argues that Washington Township should have its own ZIP code and mentions Sewell as one of the ZIP codes for Washington Township). I think that the needed change would be to indicate that Sewell covers portions of both Mantua and Washington Townships, but the right sources are needed for that.Again, thanks for seeing that same paradox that I had seen. Alansohn (talk) 04:28, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

NYC
Could you voice your opinion on the map matter, which is half and half at the moment and needs a kick in one direction or another.  IWI  ( chat ) 08:31, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

HHPL redirect
Hi, regarding this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Haddon_Heights_Public_Library&action=history

There are many other NJ public libraries just like this. Are you planning on merging all of those with their respective municipalities? TiMike (talk) 03:11, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * , No. Among the entries in Category:Public libraries in New Jersey, most are for libraries that are genuinely notable, which includes Danforth Memorial Library and East Orange Public Library, where the history and / or historic status of the library merits standalone articles. Some are like the one for the Haddon Heights Public Library, where notability is not established and for which a merge / redirect would be appropriate; I would include Haddonfield Public Library and Hopewell Public Library in that group. The material should be preserved in the municipal article and we should preserve the possibility of recreating the library article as a standalone if independent notability can be demonstrated. Alansohn (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Alansohn, Thanks for the superb explanation! – TiMike (talk) 16:03, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

== Sun October 14: Open House New York Weekend Upload Party @ NYU ITP and Indigenous People's Justice Edit-a-thon @ Interference Archive ==

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Newspapers.com
Do you have access to that? They had a free weekend, so I clipped like 40 articles. I only found out about it like an hour beforehand so I was just rushing. I've found more I would love to see clipped.

Richard Kuklinski:
 * United Press International (March 16, 1988). "Jury convicts 'Iceman' killer". The Bulletin. Bend, Oregon. p. A-2.
 * "Iceman" A18, The Record, Hackensack, New Jersey. Thu, May 26, 1988

George Byrum murder by Tony Plate and Roy DeMeo
 * The Miami News, page 44, August 25, 1976
 * The Miami Herald, page 4, June 20, 1977
 * Ford Lauderdale News, May 16, 1979, page 26

Larry Lawton: Harizotoh9 (talk) 01:23, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * "Sheriffs use DVDs for at-risk youth". Florida Today. November 19, 2009. p. A1.
 * David Berman (May 14, 2010). "Brevard Man pitches own reality show". Florida Today. p. A1.