User talk:Alansohn/Archive 39

WikiCup 2011 February newsletter
So begins round two of the WikiCup! We now have eight pools, each with eight random contestants. This round will continue until the end of April, when the top two of each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers of those remaining, will make it to round three. Congratulations to (first, with 487 points) and  (second, with 459), who stormed the first round. finished third with 223. Twelve others finished with over 100 points- well done to all of you! The final standings in round one can be seen here. A mere 8 points were required to reach round two; competition will no doubt be much more fierce this round, so be ready for a challenge! A special thanks goes, again, to for dealing with all bot work. This year's bot, as well as running smoothly, is doing some very helpful things that last year's did not. Also, thanks to for some helpful behind-the-scenes updating and number crunching.

Some news for those who are interested- March will see a GAN backlog elimination drive, which you are still free to join. Organised by WikiProject Good articles, the drive aims to minimise the GAN backlog and offers prizes to those who help out. Of course, you may well be able to claim WikiCup points for the articles you review as part of the drive. Also ongoing is the Great Backlog Drive, looking to work on clearing all of the backlogs on Wikipedia; again, incentives are offered, and the spirit of friendly competition is alive, while helping the encyclopedia is the ultimate aim. Though unrelated to the WikiCup, these may well be of interest to some of you.

Just a reminder of the rules; if you have done significant work on content this year and it is promoted in this round, you may claim for it. Also, anything that was promoted after the end of round one but before the beginning of round two may be claimed for in round two. Details of the rules can be found on this page. For those interested in statistics, a running total of claims can be seen here, and a very interesting table of that information (along with the highest scorers in each category) can be seen here. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:35, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Pat Tillman
Please take a look at Talk:Pat_Tillman and chime in on the discussion as to how the "Offensive material" guidelines apply. The disagreement is whether the word fucking is germane to the section in question or whether it is gratuitous and therefore in opposition to this guideline. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 16:26, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Pat_Tillman
Re. Pat Tillman, and the quotation/censorship debate,

In order to clarify, I am asking users to briefly, clearly state which version of the quotation they support or oppose.

Please see Talk:Pat_Tillman

I am sending this message to everyone who has previously participated in the discussion; I do not wish to make any assumptions of the previous opinion.

I want to show clear consensus, so the issue can be resolved and edit-warring can be prevented.

Thanks,

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Chzz (talk) at 00:04, 10 March 2011 (UTC).

Diaspora
Hi. Just to say I like what you did with this comment. Very clever! Cordless Larry (talk) 15:23, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for noticing. Alansohn (talk) 15:39, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I too came here to comment on your clever world play comment. It made me smile and I wanted to say thanks. I love that you can find such gems in stuffy pages like 'Categories for discussion'. I also love that when you go to the user's talk page to comment on it someone has already beaten you to the punch. Have a good one.  Dubious Irony  yell  00:34, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I was just trying to frame the issue in a lightly humorous fashion. I'm glad I'm not the only one who enjoyed it. Alansohn (talk) 02:31, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

The Public Policy Initiative Assessment Team Wants You!
Hi Alansohn, it looks like some of your contributions fall within the scope of Wikiproject: United States Public Policy, and I was hoping you would be interested in assessing articles with the Public Policy Initiative. There is more info about assessment on the 9/13/2010 Signpost. If you're interested or just curious you can sign up on the project page or just contact me. Thanks! ARoth (Public Policy Initiative) (talk) 23:32, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Rabbi Pinto - Assistance
Notice you are very active - Would you mind reviewing Rabbi Pinto page ? A major feature story ran on Rabbi Pinto, the largest story ever written about him and the few editors who control the board didnt allow neutral entrees to be placed. Need assistance from curious non interested parties.

The article was syndicated and picked up by Globes a major Israeli paper, The Real Deal a major NYC real estate publication and Vos Iz Neas Religious news service but entire chunks of article werent included. Can we have new eyes please ?

Would suggest adding: "Considerable questions have risen regarding Pinto’s organizations finances. A report by a leading New York Jewish newspaper has revealed a “contrast between the rabbi’s lifestyle and his reputation for modest living, and questions about the rabbi’s image as a business guru when his own not-for-profit faces financial problems.” The Forward stated: “The business troubles at Mosdot Shuva Israel could be seen as ironic, given Rabbi Pinto’s reputation as an adviser to businessmen, and particularly to real estate brokers.” 65.112.21.194 (talk) 13:28, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Re: List of people from Union City, New Jersey
Hey Alansohn, no problem at all :) - Theornamentalist (talk) 18:20, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Upper Merion Township, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania
Your the expert on geography. Why are articles called "Upper Merion Township, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania". What makes townships special that they have the county in the name? I thought counties were only used for disambiguation, but there is some rule that says "townships" always get a county name. Do you know more? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 05:13, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * My expertise doesn't cross the Delaware River into Pennsylvania, but I do know that *all* of the articles for townships in Pennsylvania are supposed to include the county in the title, even for the majority that didn't need disambiguation. If you look at the first three entries in List of townships in Pennsylvania you'll see that there are multiple Butler Townships and Conewago Townships (believe it or not, the name recurs three times across the state), but the title of the article for Berwick Township includes Adams County as a disambiguator even though none is needed. If I recall, this was a decision made by the folks at WikiProject Pennsylvania some time way back when. Alansohn (talk) 13:41, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 March newsletter
We are half way through round two of the WikiCup, which will end on 28 April. Of the 64 current contestants, 32 will make it through to the next round; the two highest in each pool, and the 16 next highest scorers. At the time of writing, our current overall leader is with 231 points, who leads Pool H.  (Pool G) also has over 200 points, while 9 others (three of whom are in Pool D) have over 100 points. Remember that certain content (specifically, articles/portals included in at least 20 Wikipedias as of 31 December 2010 or articles which are considered "vital") is worth double points if promoted to good or featured status, or if it appears on the main page in the Did You Know column. There were some articles last round which were eligible for double points, but which were not claimed for. For more details, see WikiCup/Scoring.

A running total of claims can be seen here. However, numerous competitors are yet to score at all- please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. The number of points that will be needed to reach round three is not clear- everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 00:51, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Mind weighing in?
Alansohn, I've seen you at LGBT-related articles (not sure if we've talked before, though I think we have), and I want to know if you wouldn't mind weighing in on this: Talk:Heterosexualization. I posted a message about it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT studies, which you may have seen already, but I hardly get any help from there or other WikiProjects these days. So part of my approach these days is to go to relevant editors individually and hope they weigh in. Flyer22 (talk) 18:44, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in a pilot study
I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only '''5 minutes’’’. cooldenny (talk) 17:44, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Paranormal places
Proposed merge of Category:Reportedly haunted locations into Category:Paranormal places. Please see Categories_for_discussion/Log/2011_April_24. Simply south...... trying to improve for 5 years 16:43, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

University Work of Wikipedia
Hello Alansohn, My name is Jonathan Medeiros, I’m a graduate student and I’m doing a university work about Wikipedia. My work is about mass production of information in peer, and I'm using Wikipedia as an object of study. We developed a field research and wonder if you could answer.

1) Please list below in order of priority what else motivates you to contribute to Wikipedia.

prestige in the community

Contribution in the Science

Recreation

Self-realization

Social Valuation

Keep interconnectivity with other collaborators

Strengthening staff - (The amount that the contributor gains acceptance or approvalof other members, strengthen social status in the community)

Awards Archives (Ex: Barnstar)

Increase the prestige of the world to Wikipedia

Sense that all can share the benefits generated

Other: _____________________________

2) List 1 to 5, where 1 is highest and 5 is lowest of important that you consider the following values ​​for Wikipedia. In the end, please explain what you consider most important.

a) AUTONOMY

b) INDEPENDENCE

c) LIBERATION

d) CREATIVITY

e) PRODUCTIVITY

f) INDUSTRY

g) BENEVOLENCE, CHARITY, GENEROSITY, ALTRUISM

h) SOCIABILITY

I) CAMARADERIE/FRIENDSHIP

L) COOPERATION

k) CIVIC VIRTUE

Below is an explanation of each item:

AUTONOMY

Collaborators are free to act according to the targets set for them. They can feel free.

INDEPENDENCE

Collaborators will have independence and freedom of spirit.

LIBERATION

Collaborators have the freedom to work as and when they want, they can decide by themselves.

CREATIVITY

Collaborators has more freedom to explore creativity, because he does not have to follow orders that they are imposed.

PRODUCTIVITY

Collaborators are always pursuing excellence in their contributions.

INDUSTRY The mass production of information opens new doors to creativity and the creation of productive practices, when compared to the industrially organized market.

BENEVOLENCE, CHARITY, GENEROSITY, ALTRUISM

Collaborator does not want financial rewards, he assists in helping the communitythinking, the only reward is the reputation that he get with the collaborations they do.

SOCIABILITY

Make contributions with an open heart, thinking of the common good, which is for the community as a whole.

CAMARADERIE / FRIENDSHIP,

Collaborator help themselves to build something of value to everyone.

COOPERATION

Collaborators help themselves to build something of value to everyone.

CIVIC VIRTUE

Collaborators are arranged volunteers with common goals and promote cooperation between them.

Thank you very much for your attention, Can you send me a email with this answers? my email address is jhoumedeiros@gmail.com. Thanks very much —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.64.241.23 (talk) 03:14, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 April newsletter
Round 2 of the 2011 WikiCup is over, and the new round will begin on 1 May. Note that any points scored in the interim (that is, for content promoted or reviews completed on 29-30 April) can be claimed in the next round, but please do not start updating your submissions' pages until the next round has begun. Fewer than a quarter of our original contestants remain; 32 enter round 3, and, in two months' time, only 16 will progress to our penultimate round. , who led Pool F, was our round champion, with 411 points, while 7 contestants scored between 200 and 300 points. At the other end of the scale, a score of 41 was high enough to reach round 3; more than five times the score required to reach round 2, and competition will no doubt become tighter now we're approaching the later rounds. Those progressing to round 3 were spread fairly evenly across the pools; 4 progressed from each of pools A, B, E and H, while 3 progressed from both pools C and F. Pools D and G were the most successful; each had 5 contestants advancing.

This round saw our first good topic points this year; congratulations to and  who also led pool H and pool B respectively. However, there remain content types for which no points have yet been scored; featured sounds, featured portals and featured topics. In addition to prizes for leaderboard positions, the WikiCup awards other prizes; for instance, last year, a prize was awarded to (who has been eliminated) for his work on In The News. For this reason, working on more unusual content could be even more rewarding than usual!

Sorry this newsletter is going out a little earlier than expected- there is a busy weekend coming up! A running total of claims can be seen here. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 19:06, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:02, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter, Spring 2011

 * —Rschen7754bot (talk) 01:59, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Whoops!
Sorry about that! It was a mistake that I did. I already know about the No research policy. Accidentally hit rollback and forgot to undo it. And I didn't add that sentence after that revert I did. I was just reverting the content removal from the IP address that he did.-- Damirgraffiti  ☺Say Yo to Me!☺   22:43, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Alfred Byrd Graf
The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 May newsletter
We're half way through round 3 of the 2011 WikiCup. There are currently 32 remaining in the competition, but only 16 will progress to our penultimate round. , of pool D, is our overall leader with nearly 200 points, while pools A, B and C are led by, and  respectively. The score required to reach the next round is 35, though this will no doubt go up significantly as the round progresses. We have a good number of high scorers, but also a considerable number who are yet to score. Please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. Also, an important note concerning nominations at featured article candidates: if you are nominating content for which you intend to claim WikiCup points, please make this clear in the nomination statement so that the FAC director and his delegates are aware of the fact.

A running total of claims can be seen here. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:20, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Feedback
Hello. Since you are involved in editing NJ pages, can we get your feedback on these discussion pages? Thanks ! Tinton5 (talk) 00:32, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Articles for deletion/Temple Emanuel (Cherry Hill, New Jersey)
 * Articles for deletion/Temple Beth Sholom (Cherry Hill, New Jersey)
 * Articles for deletion/Congregation M'Kor Shalom

Last occurences
Do you think we should bring that page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_last_occurrences back ?

Ive asked a few other people and they agree, it was a genuine enclyopedic article, Much like the front page of wikipedia ; what happened on this day and so on. If you want we could create it and work on it ? Goldblooded (talk) 16:23, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

GOCE elections
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:40, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

You're invited to the New York Wiknic!


This message is being sent to inform you of a Wikipedia picnic that is being held in your area next Saturday, June 25. From 1 to 8 PM or any time in between, join your fellow volunteers for a get together at Norman's Landscape ( directions ) in Manhattan's Central Park.

Take along your friends (newbies permitted), your family and other free culture enthusiasts! You may also want to pack a blanket, some water or perhaps even a frisbee.

If you can, share what you're bringing at the discussion page.

Also, please remember that this is the picnic that anyone can edit so bring enough food to share!

To subscribe to future events, follow the mailing list or add your username to the invitation list. BrownBot (talk) 18:56, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

List issues
I know you're a frequent editor of Jewish topics; an editor has recently been blanking many lists of Jewish people (as well as other people lists) on the claim that they are presently unsourced within the lists themselves, sometimes then prodding them as empty. Please take a look and see if you can help come to a better solution. postdlf (talk) 14:57, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I've seen the lists. While I agree that sources should be added, the best way is most often to keep the entries there and add sources for those where they are missing rather than to remove them and expect to have them reinserted. I will see what I can do regarding these lists. Alansohn (talk) 16:42, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I agree with you as to best practice here. postdlf (talk) 16:50, 23 June 2011 (UTC)