User talk:Alansohn/Archive 6

Vandalism
It is usual for a vandal to receive 4 warnings before being blocked. But in the light of your messages I have given him a final, definite and unmistakable last warning.--Anthony.bradbury 23:04, 1 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry - User:Yadigit5 i was talking about.--Anthony.bradbury 23:06, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Merge proposal: incorporated place and census designated place into place (United States Census Bureau)
While caught up in the argument about whether we should use the term "census designated place" as the primary term to refer to unincorporated towns and villages I did a bit of research. I think what I found was interesting and useful. However I found it awkward to incorporate the information into the census designated place article, partly because the material also belongs in the incorporated place article. Also, a lot of the CDP article explains how a CDP resembles, but is not, an incorporated place where the incorporated place article is practically empty. I don't think there is enough unique material for three separate articles so I'm proposing a merger into one article named "place (United States Census Bureau)". I have already written the article that explains the terms in a logical order. I am asking for opinions, edits, etc. from other people who have written on the issue. See Talk:Place (United States Census Bureau) for more information. Rsduhamel 01:12, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for starting Melanie Balcomb!
I've been meaning to start articles for various Vanderbilt coaches, but I think it looks tacky if I'm one of a couple of fans doing so. Thanks for starting this! Cheers, PhilipR 02:13, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Please click on this following link
I would like you to see this.  Amos Han  Talk 20:12, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter - Issue 5

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. — V   6   0     (Bot?)    干什么？ ·  VDemolitions  ·  啤酒？ 02:58, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

re:Userify Tiquan Underwood
I'm not sure I understand why the article was deleted, but could I ask you to create a user version of the article for me so that I can address the wikifying and reference issues that seem sto have been the reason for deletion. While I have refeernced the article, I apparently hadn't added it to my watchlist. Alansohn 19:53, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It was a one-liner, "Tiquan Underwood is the star wide receiver on the Rutgers University Football Team." That's all. It was tagged as db-bio, but it could have been under A1 or A3 as well (lack of context/content). He might be notable, but it needs a little more info on why. Cheers, Fang Aili talk 16:43, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Linens 'n Things
I moved the text of this article from Linens-N-Things to Linens 'n Things, because "Linens 'n Things" is the official spelling. "Linens-N-Things" now redirects to Linens 'n Things instead of vice-versa. TenPoundHammer 11:40, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

New Jersey Governors -- Codey and Corzine
It's nice to know that there is someone as concerend with accuracy when it comes to numbering NJ governors and what does and does not count as a Governor's term.Aronk 19:17, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

NJ Thanks You
I've come across several of your edits during my review of New Jersey pages; specifically, I saw your comments preventing vandalism on the Jon Corzine page and your corrections to EricL on the List of New Jersey Governors page. Just wanted to stop by and say "Thanks" for all the work you've done. Several NJ articles are accurate because of your contributions. JasonCNJ 20:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

I did not "vandalize" the Gary Whiteside page. He is not a notable person. I attempted to delete the page. I am committed to Wikipedia as an engine of integrity, but obviously I am not yet well-versed in the technical aspects of contributing. I will brush up. In the meantime, I suggest reconsidering your claim that deleting a page of someone who is not noteworthy by any definition constitutes vandalism.

RfA?
 AQu01rius would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact AQu01rius to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Requests for adminship/. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.

Can't believe your not a sysop. Interested in running? AQu01rius (User • Talk) 22:43, 14 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I created the page now, just awaiting for your acception. I think you will make a excellent admin, and you will be able to maximize your contribution with the tools on NJ-related articles. AQu01rius (User • Talk) 05:20, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I support this nomination too, it's about time. Ab  e  g92   We are all Hokies!  01:49, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Go for it if you want it. We haven't always gotten along in the past, but you'd certainly have my support. -- NORTH talk 03:24, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Corzine
Just wanted to check with you to see whether you thought the NY Times graphic that recreates Corzine's accident on the GSP should be included on the page. It is based on the NJ State Trooper reports, and therefore pretty dependable. Let me know what you think, and I could add it in again.--Bluefield 15:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Good deal, I put it back in there at the tail end of your paragraph. That is still amazing that the Governor wasn't wearing a seatbelt....so much for setting a good example huh? Take it easy.Bluefield 16:06, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Another barnstar
I left you a barnstar on your user page again.  Amos Han  Talk 01:18, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. I live in Bergen County so I know many things about what's there.  Amos Han  Talk 01:25, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

CODY
if cody stays in 180 days you would have to add to his box and say that he is the 55th Govenor then i think corzine is going to be out of office for 365 days

Articles for deletion/Bel Air Middle School (3rd nomination)
Thanks for your kind words at the above AfD and kudos to you on your corresponding efforts at other school articles. It's amazing how much can be found for most schools to satisfy the notability concerns of most editors, especially at the high school level, goven just 10 to 15 minutes. Until we can establish agreement on notability standards for schools, it appears that you and I will be kept quite busy. Alansohn 18:29, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I have also been pretty busy with my WP:RFA lately since I have had to answer questions while travelling up and down the country :-) TerriersFan 18:38, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Bound Brook flooding
Great edits on Bound Brook (as elswhere... your project NJ is great). But don't you think the new flooding section which you created should follow the history section, rather than precede it? Out of respect I'm not changing it without your ok. What do you think? Bruxism 04:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Middle Township Mock Trial
Dear Alansohn, My name is Jake Vhabae, and I'm a former member of the Middle Township Mock Trial team. I am originally from Belleplain, NJ and I have spent 3 of my 4 high school years at Middle Township High School.

I have since updated the MTHS site, put a list of team members (both past and present) and I have noticed that they have been removed.

As I understand it, the reason for the removal is due to the claim that the names and team member list are "unencyclopedic." I disagree with that claim, I believe that if the "Guns N' Roses" Wikipedia site can have a list of members, the all too academic MTHS Mock Trial site should also have a list of members.

Sir, this is very important to me. I would appreciate it if we could talk more about this matter. I feel that our conflict can be resolved, as I have verification of all names on the list. I can also verify through Ms. Martina Trapani (the team's head coach). Being from New Jersey, you know how close-knit we are. We show school spirit. This Mock Trial team has only strengthened the Middle Township community. I ask you to let the MTHS Mock Trial team members recieve the recogniton they deserve.

Thank you,

Jake Vhabae, jakevhabae[at]gmail[dot].com
 * If I may, I think the reason Alansohn may have done this is not because he doesn't consider it significant, but Wikipedia considers it insignificant, per WP:NOTABLE. Wikipedia is not a place to give merit, an award, or other congratulatory recognition; it is a place where the world can go for encyclopedic information.  Just like your Mock Trial team wouldn't be in the Encarta online encyclopedia, so too should it not be allowed here.  Also, using the comparison of Grammy-winning artists that are known across the world is not an acceptable comparison.  Most people outside of South Jersey wouldn't even know where Middle Township is, and even less people would care who is on their Mock Trial team.  I don't mean to sound berating, but you have to realize it truly is not noteworthy and nothing more than a waste of space.  If you wish to dispute this, Alansohn can't do anything about it; you would need to take it before the Policies Committee, who will then determine if this is, in fact, notable for use on Wikipedia. EaglesFanInTampa (formerly Jimbo) 17:13, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter - Issue 6

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —Rschen7754bot 21:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

External links should only exist where they are specifically related to the article topic--not a related use
These external links, for example, belong only in the West Deptford Public Schools article, not every article about the individual schools. #13, etc. Seattlenow 01:28, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * West Deptford Public Schools
 * National Center for Education Statistics data for the West Deptford Public Schools
 * National Center for Education Statistics data for the West Deptford Public Schools


 * If you feel that your contribution to Wikipedia is to remove links to school districts from high school articles, I will point out that its clear to me that these links "are specifically related to the article topic", though I will acknowledge that an argument could be made that the links are not necessary. However, the links to the New Jersey School Report Cards and the data from the National Center for Education Statistics are directly relevant to each and every school and there is no valid justification for their removal. Alansohn 01:35, 23 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Less than 1% of my total edits under all accounts have anything to do with schools, let alone their external links. The proper external link for the third one in the list (nces.ed.gov), for example, would be specific to the school, NOT the district-wide one. Following your argument, http://www.usa.gov/ would be 'specifically relevant' to every U.S. city, U.S. county, U.S. state, etc., article on Wikipedia. Other than in-line cites, there is hardly ever a reason for any specific external link to appear in more than one Wikipedia article--only the specific one they are most directly related to. Articles that offer broad coverage of the West Deptford Public Schools district only belong in the West Deptford Public Schools article. Seattlenow 01:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Jon Corzine
I did not vandalize Jon Corzine's page. I was fed information that turned out to be false by a New Jersey elected official about Corzine's passing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.239.145.197 (talk • contribs)

Buses WikiProject
I notice that you have edited lists of bus routes recently. You might be interested in helping with the new WikiProject buses, especially the proposed Bus route list guide. We are also working out when a bus route should have its own article and other issues. --NE2 15:27, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

I looked, really I did
I wanted to make sure that things were different this time around. They weren't. For the most part, only the Atlantic City area papers had any mention of the Freeholders involved in AfD discussions. In some cases, even that wasn't the case. County officeholders who don't achieve notice outside the county are simply not notable enough.

This isn't personal, especially after an eight-month cooling off period. DarkAudit 18:07, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Regarding Corzine's residence
While I agree that Corzine's city of residence is worth including in the article, the Drumthwacket article claims that Corzine lives there part-time, implying that he splits his time between the official mansion in Princeton and, presumably, a private residence in Hoboken. If he does not, in fact, live part-time at Drumthwacket, that article ought to be fixed. However, if he does split his time between the two residences, this fact ought to be included in any reference to his residences in the Jon Corzine article. However, if we change the sentence in the introductory paragraph to reflect this information, it makes the statement rather unwieldy. I would therefore suggest that we keep the residence reference, but relocate it to some other position within the article, thereby allowing the introductory paragraph to flow more smoothly. What do you think? -Grammaticus Repairo 23:40, 26 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Speaking as one who is not a resident of New Jersey, I am curious as to why it is so significant that he lives and spends substantial amounts of time in Hoboken? Obviously, of course, one would think that he, as governor, ought to spend a fair amount of time in the state capital (whenever he isn't busy settling disputes between talk-show hosts and basketball teams), as well as spend time in various cities throughout the state he is supposed to govern.  But does Hoboken have some particular reputation of which I should be aware?  Just curious...  -Grammaticus Repairo 00:41, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Schools and notability
Namaste Alansohn,

I went to the WP:NOTE talk pages and read the two old discussions regarding trying to set notability guidelines for schools, its not very encouraging. This seems to be a battleground for the Inclusionistas and Deletionieros and neither side seems willing to give any ground. I have to say that I would probably be considered a running-dog Deletionist. I think there are many things that are verifiable and sourcable, perhaps even notable, but are just not encyclopedic. There is the whole rest of the web out there, isn't there?

But...The greatest thing I learned in college was when I was arguing an obscure point on a test question I had gotten wrong on some minor point relating to the Kreb's cycle (relates to energy creation and use in cell metabolism). The instructor let me go on for a while and answered my points and then said, Bill, is this the hill you want to die on?

Well, I looked at her for a moment and then felt rather stupid and said, "No," and she said, "Very well then, lets move on."

She meant it in a joking way and it wasn't at all a putdown. She was a great teacher and we became friends after the class was over, but I never forgot that question.

When my daughter was in her pre- and teens there were times when she wanted to dye her hair green or do her school shopping at Goodwill and wear polyester Marcia Brady shifts or three full-length black slips to school or make soup out of one of every vegetable from the Albertson's and I would think, "Is this the hill I want to die on?" and decide that no, it wasn't.

Really Bad News friends? Riding with people who have been drinking? Yeah, I'll die on those hills, but few others are worth the fight. I was a single parent and I credit that teacher with my sanity and Amelia's unique perfection.

I bring all this up because I see so much time and energy being wasted over this debate and whatever I think about it, this hill is not worth dying on. I also feel that the issue is hindering the advancement of civility here, and if I have any ulterior motive, for this or WP as a whole, the promotion of civility is it.

I am thinking about proposing that all schools be considered notable, subject only to verifiability and as far as I'm concerned, a phone book entry would be sufficient.

You've been around awhile, certainly longer than me, so I want to ask you if you think there is a snowball's chance of this being accepted. I think the inclusionists have an advantage in this battle and the fact that 85% of the school AfD's are resulting in keep seems to show a broad consensus in general, if not in every case.

If you feel this worth persuing or have any other thoughts on the matter, let me know. If I do persue it I would like to have a group of people from both sides onboard to launch the proposal. I'm not trying to stack the vote, I just don't want to fight old battles over again.

I'm going to post this to a few other talk pages to get an idea of what the mood is out there.

Thanks!-- killing sparrows  (chirp!) 07:55, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

PPB song of praise
Hi Alan, I removed the song from Point Pleasant Beach because it looked bogus and I could find no reference to it, or to Manukyan's alleged authorship of it, anywhere else. It was inserted 13 January 2006 by IP user 71.130.84.192 in LA who never contributed anything to Wikipedia before or since. Regards, CliffC 13:05, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

[Later that same day] I'll be damned. You're a better searcher than I am, Alansohn. --CliffC 23:17, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Watch it.....
Excuse me, but watch the allegations of sockpuppetry. I have been going through the AfD page and noticed some articles that I wanted to vote on. If you have a problem with it, like you seem to do with other editors that disagree with you, then I guess that's too bad. I think you would understand my harsh tone here as allegations of sockpuppetry are a serious matter so before you jump to conclusions, get your facts straight. In the future, refrain from posting this nonsense on my talk page. MetsFan76 14:19, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh so now I am not a sockpuppet??? You make the allegation and then take it back?  I have over 3500 edits, the majority being vandalism reverts so I see no reason why you find the need to consider me a sockpuppet or that I am stalking.  I have stated on the AfDs why I voted for deletions.  Many editors put "per nom" as they simply agree with the nominator and does not find the need to write out the same response.  It is by chance that you happen to have voted on those AfDs as well.  You know that I have an issue with school articles as we have bumped heads on a prior school AfD a few weeks ago so I don't see what your problem is.  As for the Frank Finnerty article, I found that one of the AfD main page and thought it was a ludicrous article.  Again, watch your allegations as I am a productive editor. MetsFan76 14:33, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't understand you. I just explained my "pattern" of AfD votes in that they were simply harmless.  Unless you explain why my reasoning for my so-called "pattern" is not ok with you, then your "warning" is inappropriate. MetsFan76 14:42, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

My communication with RGTraynor
This editor was an involved participant in the relevant AfD discussions the day I initiated them. In fact, he was the first respondent to any of them. I felt contacting him was warranted because he had already commented on the subject. A different set of eyes may see things in ways neither of us may have thought of. As it stands now, it's not much more than the two of us going around in circles. With that, there can be no winners, but only exhausted and disillusioned participants.

I do not feel I am in error, but I will not attempt to invite others into the discussion. DarkAudit 03:41, 30 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Beyond which I am more than a touch angry at mudslinging going on in defense of an article which was a clear copyvio and speedied as such. I strongly recommend, Alansohn, that you rein in your rhetoric and take a good hard look at WP:OWN before daring to do so again, because while I just had doubts about your objectivity before, your credibility just took a huge hit.   RGTraynor  13:27, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Additional
I also contacted the admin NawlinWiki about these AfD's. Not for any intervention, but to give a heads up that soon both sides are going to be dug in. Once that happens, and if no one else is coming in to comment, there's really no point in going forward. DarkAudit 03:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Canvassing or not canvassing
WP:CANVAS says this:

"A hard and fast rule does not exist with regard to selectively notifying certain editors who have or are thought to have a predetermined point of view on their talk pages in order to influence a vote. However, the greater the number of editors contacted, the more often this behavior is engaged in, and the greater the resulting disruption, the more likely it is that this behavior will result in warnings and/or sanctions. Some Wikipedians have suggested that informing editors on all "sides" of a debate (e.g., everyone who voted in a previous AfD on a given subject) may be acceptable.

The Arbitration Committee has ruled that "[t]he occasional light use of cross-posting to talk pages is part of Wikipedia's common practice. However, excessive cross-posting goes against current Wikipedia community norms. In a broader context, it is unwiki. "1. Wikipedia editors are therefore not to engage in aggressive cross-posting in order to influence votes, discussions, requests for adminship, requests for comment, etc."

I fail to see how contacting one or two people who are already actively involved in the current round of discussions would be considered 'excessive'.

I feel all four of the current AfDs are related, so seeking input from someone who has already commented would be warranted. DarkAudit 04:03, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

The Committee thinks otherwise
I have posted word for word the position of the Arbitration Committee with regard to what is or is not canvassing. I've done so twice over. In the eyes of the Committee, contacting two people currently involved in related discussions, although definitely not endorsed, most certainly do not rise to the level of the accusations you are now throwing around.

I believe I have acted in good faith by respectfully disagreeing, but refraining from contacting anyone else all the same. There is truly no good reason for you to continue to pursue this angle. DarkAudit 04:27, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Enough
It's obvious that there is no changing your mind about this. You're no longer trying to defend the articles. You're only interested in throwing mud at me. I've had my say. And so have you. It's time for an admin to shut this down. For good or ill, it's time. I am in #wikipedia asking an admin to close the AFD before it is no longer civil. It's been heated, but for the most part civil. DarkAudit 04:58, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Changing the playing field
I went to #wikipedia, just as I said I would. I asked that the AfD's be closed as is, and that I was not asking for any endorsement either way. The solution they came up with was to relist them instead. That means they'll show up on today's list of AfD's. As for me, I'm staying out of it from this point. I may peek in to see how the discussion's going, but I've said all I really can about the matter.

And now... my bed is calling. it's really quite late. G'night. DarkAudit 05:21, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Schoolwatch
Yes, sorry about that. I just looked at the number of edits recently and it was very small, but I didn't look in the archive which is far more active. Funny, really, I created the original generation of that archive a couple of years ago, when I was very active on that project. Cheers. --Tony Sidaway 12:40, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Need help on Gerritsen Beach Article
Hey Alansohn, Recently Gerritsen Beach has been in the news and has been the subject of some vandalism. Can you warn the Users doing so.--Guyver8400 13:44, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Civility and Good Faith
Alan, some advice: you need to tone things down a bit. Your accusations of vote stacking, poor faith, and sock-puppetry have become a bit wanton and it seems to be too often your recourse with people who disagree with you. I recall certain other unfounded instances as well when you made such baseless accusations. Remember to assume good faith and recall that, despite your passion to convince, some editors will inevitably be in disagreement with you. I suggest you moderate your comments, although I wouldn't want you to diminish the enthusiasm with which you argue your beliefs. Eusebeus 23:32, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Sockpuppetry was based on a misreading of an individual's contribution history, but the votestacking was rather clear-cut. The sequence of AfDs submitted by the user in question was in most cases his third attempt to delete these articles, most of which ended in rather one-sided decisions to keep the articles in question. Even you might acknowledge that the same person taking multiple cracks at deleting articles that passed previous AfDs is not exactly cricket. Other than that, I will try to take your advice to heart. Taking a second, and then a third, crack at deleting an article is evidence of rather extreme bad faith. I was glad to see that you have found topics that you feel comfortable editing, instead of almost exclusively passing judgment on AfDs. While the topics you appear to be editing are likely to be almost AfD-proof, the day will come when the first article you've worked on is put for AfD. It'll happen sooner or later. Its amazing what happens when an article you've invested much time and effort in is subject to review by a bunch of people who spend most of their time on Wikipedia voting delete on articles that don't interest them but who seem to get much delight from getting rid of your article. Alansohn 23:49, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply. But it seems that even here you are showing signs of incivility. I am *wholly appreciative* that your review of my contribution history passes some kind of muster, although clearly my involvement at AfD tinges my edits for you. And so be it. But you need to tone things down and keep a calmer head. I disagree with many editors, and many disagree with me. But unleashing sarcastic, bilious screeds against people (see above) is unhelpful. You may find I and others set the bar too high for deletion, but that is not license for unleashing borderline personal attacks against those with whom you have a philosophical difference. Your tone is too aggressive and combative and, frankly, incommensurate with your contributions here. WP works on consensus and disagreement is a healthy part of that. No-one in this context is the final arbiter. Eusebeus 00:00, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:NJ-AtlanticCountyFreeholders
Template:NJ-AtlanticCountyFreeholders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Caknuck 06:59, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Marlboro Township School District
You are the only one who seems to think that it should be Marlboro Public Schools, and you ignored my messages, therefore, a consensus was reached. By the way, it is Marlboro Township School District; not only do I know because I attend them, but their letterhead says Marlboro Township School District. aido2002 21:23, 2 May 2007 (UTC)


 * After looking at the documents they post on theor website, I realized that a majority of their letterhead, and their website, says "MARLBORO K-8 SCHOOL DISTRICT". So, as a compromise, let's move the article there. aido2002 21:25, 2 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I had moved them properly, and they were reverted back, wishing for consensus. It has been reached, they WILL be moved. aido2002 21:29, 2 May 2007 (UTC)


 * It is not required that we go through that process, this situation does not fit the criteria. aido2002 21:35, 2 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Once again, this situation does not fit the criteria. We need not nominate it. aido2002 21:44, 2 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I tried many times to discuss this with you, and you ignored me. Therefore, consensus was reached--I was the only one who cared. If you attempt to take measures against me for what you claim to be "vandalism", I will contact an admin over this issue. aido2002 02:21, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Hannukah Harry
Thanks for rewriting it. I still think it should be up to the community. There seems to be some consensus that even as an SNL Skit, it is not wiki worthy. And the guy thought he was being sneaky and copied the same article under the title Chanukah Harry! BTW, left the 5 Towns as soon as I graduated HS! Postcard Cathy 03:47, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter - Issue 7

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. — Vsh Bot (t • c) 19:22, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Stoopid Monkey Logos
As you are probably aware, the Stoop!d Monkey page was the subject of an AfD and the result was, of course, "Keep". Currently, the logos are a point of contention with myself saying that they were part of the "Keep", while User:Calton saying they were to be dropped and the article was to remain.

I asked the admin who closed the AfD his opinion and he replied, "I just said the article was to be kept, I don't know about the logos". There wasn't a decision given on the logos and in the AfD only 3 users said the logos should go, only 1 said keep the article, lose the logos.

I am not sure how to handle this, but since the admin who closed the AfD made no decision and the AfD wasn't about the logos in the first place (and the majority said to keep the logos if you want to be picky about it, as far as I can tell).

This wasn't an issue from April 16th (immediately after the AfD) to May 3rd when User:Calton realized that I was blocked for 48hours (not related to this) and I couldn't revert his changes. User:Calton had no interest and made no changes on the page itself or the talk page during that time. So, to me, his initial revert on May 3rd was done because of my block.

I have asked two admins (in case one is offline) to revert his changes and put a block on the page until this can be worked out. I am also asking you, since you contributed to the AfD, what your opinion is on just the logos themselves. I appericate you input one way or the other. Thanks...SVRTVDude (VT)

Corzine
Your reply is welcome at User_talk:Grammaticus_Repairo or directly to me. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 19:27, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Faulkner Act communities
Where do you get your information supporting "Faulkner Act" towns? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.150.33.154 (talk • contribs)


 * Unfortunately, I have never been able to find a reliable source online. The best sources I have found in print are the "New Jersey Legislative Data Book" and "The New Jersey Municipal Data book", both of which are published annually and available in most libraries in New Jersey. Alansohn 00:09, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Your edits to User talk:RGTraynor
Please do not introduce any form of vandalism to the userpages of other users.  RGTraynor  19:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I've asked that respect your request.--Isotope23 20:40, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

The answer to the previous question about faulkner law act was not to helpful. I have ordered the books and cannot find that Harrison is a Faulkner Law act. I want to take advantage of the right to citizens and need o prove to my governing body hat they are aFaulkner Law act. I believe that Eminent Domain Abuse should be stopped. I believe that Harrisonians feel the same. I am willing to let the people vote. I have a petition to pass a resoulution to stop it, but some help would be like a blessing from God.

LWVNJ source re Fed/State districts; refine Faulkner Act cat) I'M SORRY, But what does this mean?

Coming soon to Wikiproject: Chicago...

 * http://www.wbbm780.com/pages/418339.php?contentType=4&contentId=467953

How long do you think it will be until this person is added to WP:Chicago? -Grammaticus Repairo 20:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

User talk:RGTraynor
has asked you to cease posting on his talkpage. Please respect that request.--Isotope23 20:37, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Multi-column support
Before proclaiming victory, it looks like it works only in Firefox, not on IE. I tried Bergen County, New Jersey using both browsers and saw a single column using IE. Alansohn 13:46, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Bah. IE6 or IE7?  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 19:58, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


 * IE6 doesn't seem to support columns in this manner. Alansohn 20:00, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Yeah, my hope was that IE7 does, but I'm unsure. At least if IE7 does support it (now or in the future), only the reflist template will need to be changed.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 20:05, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Large amounf of vandalism across multiple articles
Sorry to bother you, but a couple of users have been atacking the Gerritsen Beach article in other brooklyn articles. Political Correctness Terminator & Dee Manz are the users. Could you lend a hand?--207.38.188.126 00:47, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: LIRR station info
I take it you saw my link, and I'm glad you like it. I have shown that source in the past when I write these details down, but I should probably do it more often. DanTD 12:55, 13 May 2007 (UTC)


 * What is the source??? Alansohn 13:37, 13 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Here's a good one(http://www.trainsarefun.com/lirrphotos/LIRR%20Station%20History.htm), although there are others. DanTD 13:41, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Great Neck Schools
I've been seeing more and more of your edits and I want to thank you for some of the revert work you have been doing. MrMacMan Talk  19:51, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

I Lost on Jeopardy
I'm disappointed the trivia section didn't have the questions to go with those answers. Quick! To the Google! :) DarkAudit 01:03, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Width of streets in Manhattan
Thanks for correcting and expanding my sentence about the width of streets and blocks in Manhattan. Edward 22:19, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

NYC Deparftment of Education
Why did you add the regions 1-4 to the New York City Department of Education, it just looks bad. :)

Do you think they will survive? It looks like the DOE is going to get rid of them soon, I just wanted a way to switch on the template to get to other schools easily.--Guyver8400 15:08, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Immaculata High School
I notice you keep warning people about that. Dunno if you are an alumni or anything, but all those IP adresses you keep warning are from the computers in the library. They're not actual people. --LtWinters 00:16, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Manhatten FAC
Dear Alan—I'm sorry that you've reacted negatively to my review of the writing in the nomination. Perhaps I was a little blunt; I suppose some of my stock statements come from having nominators treat prose reviews half-heartedly or from those who feel that merely correcting the examples is enough. My remarks weren't intended to be soft and polite, but I meant no snideness or derision. When you nominated it, I presume you were prepared to have your work picked over and criticised; after all, you're seeking a gold-star endorsement of it.

You should have little trouble finding good copy-editors to lend fresh eyes to the text. You've worked hard to bring it to nomination, so it's worth enlisting others to use their distance from the text productively. I'd be doing that myself if I'd nominated an article. Tony 14:15, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter - Issue 8

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. — Vsh Bot (t • c) 19:04, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

move
Hello. Did I go about that wrong of trying to move that article? I'm a new user but I thought the change was fairly legitimate. Thanks ^^--Idda 05:43, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

re: Clarification re 2005 population estimate for Westfield, New Jersey
Thank you; I had not seen the footnote for the the 2005 est, so I assumed someone made it up. I apologize for clobbering your edit. Thanks for fixing. --Mwexler 17:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Han Amos
I am User:Han Amos, the user who gave you two barnstars and recently changed my name to User:NHRHS2010. Just to tell you that I created new articles about New Jersey roads, like Franklin Turnpike, West Saddle River Road, and East Saddle River Road. NHRHS2010 Talk  00:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for the help on the Kingsland Explosion. It was my first article and as you can see, I am not very good at this yet. Any advice or assistance is appreciated. --Witchzilla 18:37, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Daniel S. Nevins
I am disturbed and disappointed by your decision to summarily delete the Daniel S. Nevins article. The first sentence of the article makes the rather explicit claim of notability as "Dean of the Rabbinical School of the Jewish Theological Seminary". A click on that article would have indicated that the school is one of the primary rabbinic seminaries of the Conservative Judaism movement and a school affiliated with Columbia University. The proffered explanation of WP:CSD is unacceptable given the explicit claim of notability and the breadth and content of the article. Your assistance in undoing the damage you have done will be appreciated. Alansohn 00:03, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


 * There were no 3rd party reliable sources to substantiate his notability as required by the Notability (people) guidelines. A "personal website" link is insufficient in this regard. The article was also part of a series of biographies all started and mostly written by User:Rabbijason who made substantial Conflict of interest violations including authoring his own autobiography at Jason A. Miller. If you wish to have my actions overturned then file an appeal at Deletion review. --  Netsnipe  ►  02:48, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


 * One would assume that, as an administrator, you would be familiar with the various mechanisms that exists to request the addition of sources. Again, and as you have ignored, the article you took it upon yourself to delete made explicit claims of notability, in complete contradiction to your improper and destructive use of WP:CSD as a rather poor excuse for deletion. I find it disappointing that you are hiding behind the Deletion review process, rather than revisiting and undoing the damage you have caused. It astounds me that there are administrators who exercise such poor discretion in using the powers they have been granted. Alansohn 02:52, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

If you want to blame anyone, you can blame User:Rabbijason for violating Sock puppetry in the first place. This in effect brought his Conflict of interest violations and non-compliance with Notability (people) to my attention. --  Netsnipe  ►  02:57, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't know who this user is, have never interacted with him and do not know who he is in real life. I didn't delete this article, you did. This and other deletions were somehow intended to cleanse Wikipedia of any articles that this user had contact with. There is the alternative possibility that among all his edits, there might have been some legitimate edits. A check of the links to this now defunct article supports the claims of notability, including providing sources to his background, especially at the Frisch School article, where I had added a reliably sourced article that clearly demonstrates notability. I will again ask you to take a look at the article and those items that link to it and see if there just might justification for keeping this article, despite the fact that you see issues with its creator. Your efforts in doing this review and recreating the article will undo the damage created by the deletion of the article. I will be more than happy to add additional reliable sources sources to address any of your legitimate concerns. Alansohn 03:10, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

I've now undeleted Alan Silverstein, Daniel S. Nevins, Jason A. Miller and William H. Lebeau and tagged them as requested by you. I will send them to Articles for Deletion if they do not meet our Notability (people) guidelines within 2 weeks. --  Netsnipe  ►  17:20, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

I nominated my article Tompkins Square Park Police Riot for FA status
From the nomination page: (self-nomination)This article is simply excellent. Excellent writing, interesting subject matter, improved during its Good Article trial, and eye-witnesses have left notes on the Talk page that talk about the article being so accurate, it's like they were living it all over again. Written in a NPOV and heavily cited with the highest of sources, it includes GFDL media, is wikified to the fullest, a fantastic "See Also" section, and looks at the story from every angle. --David Shankbone 18:26, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

4000 edits
Hello. Do you remember me? I just made my 4000th edit today. NHRHS2010 Talk  23:11, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Marco Casagrande astroturfing
Check hereRequests for checkuser/Case/Britisharchitecturefoundation23. Check their contributions. Check the deletion logs from the last two days. Check the talk pages of myself and others discussing this case. And check WP:CIVIL before you start throwing around the snark when you haven't done the legwork others have put in. DarkAudit 05:31, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Baseball project page
Thanks for posting your comments. I see I am not the only one having problems with User talk:Tecmobowl. I don't necessarily have a problem with all his edits, just with his inflexible attitude. His idea of "discussion" is lecturing the rest of us on how things are going to be. Baseball Bugs 15:38, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * And thanks for your answer. I think a case is building against him, slowly. The sad part is that I think he has something to contribute. Ironically, he posted a "wikiquette" complaint against me, while refusing to observe any "wikiquette" himself. Baseball Bugs 15:44, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * So he's doing it in other areas too, eh? Well, it sounds like an RFC case is building. Baseball Bugs 15:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Amy Handlin.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Amy Handlin.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:30, 1 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Longhair\talk 09:30, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

JDHS
Do you even attend the high school? Honestly, I cannot stand it when people who don't go there or haven't gone there start editing things. There are a bunch of us who actually go there who look after the page, so stop trying to fix things that you don't know about.

AfD
It was a very difficult decision in closing the nom, and after re-evaluating the discussion, I will have to (with some reluctancy) say the result was no consensus. Here's why: Again, this was a difficult reconsideration; I hope you understand. Sr13 09:31, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * A very similar discussion (that has even been suggested to be merged into the AfD we are discussing) resulted in a delete, and you can see the clear consensus to do so. I considered some of the merit discussed there and applied those arguments into my decision.
 * Although there was a higher count of keep's over deletes, both sides had strong arguments. As much as possible, I try not to count, but rather see the arguments first.
 * A "no consensus" result means simply that there has been no concrete decision made. A no consensus result more than one time in the past suggests that no matter how many times an AfD is filed, there will always be strong feelings on both sides to the argument, and will never reach outright consensus. This may be a place for policy, in which specific guidelines can be determined, rather than discussion, where users can interpret what they believe from policy that may be too broad of a scope.

Route 55
I've seen that you've bypassed the redirect. That's okay, but it's just more convent for the people who use the pipe trick to type in Route 42 (New Jersey). The U.S. Route 40 in New Jersey article will be created somehow. ( [ →] zel zany  - review) 14:41, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/WCBS-TV News Team
I read your comment on the AfD, and I disagree with it. Please explain how you feel the page should remain when, as was mentioned, this info was originally in the main WCBS-TV article and should be restored there. As a separate article, its scope is limited to only those who care about who's doing or who's done news on channel 2 (a very small group) and not to the whole Wiki-comminity.

And, furthermore, please explain your comment "Any AfD that uses the word 'cruft', or any form thereof as an excuse for deletion ought to be retained for that reason alone." Can one take that to mean you are in favor of limited-scope fancruft staying on Wikipedia? Rollosmokes 20:55, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Taylor Allderdice High School
Hi, I saw you did some edits to Taylor Allderdice High School... The problem is that section is part of a [|this mediation request] and a past [|informal mediation]! I'm not sure if your edits will be disputed or not, but maybe you should place a message on the talk page explaining your edit (a brief informative post), so nobody dares to missinterpret your contribution and we can even use it as a way to solve problems. Best regards, --Neigel von Teighen 15:17, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm a participant in the mediations Neigel von Teighen mentions. The "mediation alert" Arkyan inserted at Taylor Allderdice High School is inside the section on The Foreword, so I think you edited with common sense even if you didn't see the notice. In any case, I looked at your edits and I think you contributed good and sourced stuff. 0-0-0-Destruct-0 17:10, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Jurassic Park IV
No offence, but your lengthy conversation about the articles deletion is really cluttering the page, and I suggest talking perhaps on the other Users talk page that you seem to be discussing with, or perhaps directly tell me what problem you have with my nomination.

And like I said earlier, part of the reason for my AFD was I also previously created the Jurassic Park franchise article, and so the film article could then be deleted and a footnote about the film and its possible creation could be added there if necessary. Rodrigue 19:53, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

And the only reason for my withdrawly of nominationwould be Snowball clause, but with the votes for merging and deleting, that is certainly not the case. Rodrigue 19:58, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Jurassic park
Firstly, you do realize that this is by no means the frist article to be nominated for AFd more than once,right?And if there was such a strong consensus to keep as you said about the other AFd, then why do alot of people now seem to want to delete or merge the article?

And I also spoke to User:Night Gyr on the matter, and he agreed with me as well that there are infact no real policies regarding double jeopardy on wikipedia like I said, and simply renominating a page doesn't mean I violated Consensus unless I had clear bad intension.So what I did is no different from other pages that have been renominated as well. Rodrigue 23:25, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

If you are saying double jeopardy itself is a violation of wikipedia, then thats a bigger issue and you need do more than just harass one person for doing it.If you meant just how I did it, then explain how I should have done it.

Anyway, User:Night Gyr and User talk:Bignole,the one you had the lenghty discussion with don't think I did anything wrong, but I I'de like to see some third-party support for what your saying. Rodrigue 15:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Merger
If you think merging the article with Jurassic Park franchise would help, thats fine.But that doesn't mean the AFD page needs to be closed, the result may not be no consensus, people can come to the conclusion to merge in a AFD. Rodrigue 17:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Terminator 4
You know Jurassic Park IV is very much the same as Terminator 4, which was also deleted after several AFDs and for the same reason I nominated Jurassic Park IV, Wikipedia is not a Crystal Ball.

First of all, do you think it was wrong that Terminator 4 was nominated several times for deletion after the first consensus Delete, or do you think it shouldn't have been deleted in the first place, given there is about as much info about it as Jurassic Park IV. Rodrigue 19:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

H.W. Mountz School
I saw that you contributed a lot to the article I created. I'm trying to find a source about its history, especially about the first principal after whom the school was named, but finding one online has proven difficult. Any suggestions or help? 21:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Hello
I do not want to engage in another argument over the links found on a number of baseball articles. That being said, the B-R bullpen is a wiki and not considered a reliable source. In WP:EL, it clearly states: "Links to open wikis, except those with a substantial history of stability and a substantial number of editors." B-R bullpen seems to fail on both accounts. However, if you find some good information there, I would encourage you to include that information on the relevant wikipedia article and find the original source for that information. //Tecmobowl 03:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)


 * As stated in the edit summary, and despite your claim, the B-R bullpen satisfies WP:EL. You have not even bothered to provide an excuse for deletion of the fangraphs link. Unless you can demonstrate that you have convinced the relevant editors that these links should not be used, the status quo dictates that they remain as is. Your persistent insistence to impose you own arbitrary views, here and elsewhere, and to refuse to comply with efforts to reach consensus, are going to place you at substantial risk of Wikipedia sanctions. This is a collective effort, it's not your place to be dictating what stays or goes in the face of a clear consensus that disagrees with your actions. Alansohn 03:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I have spent an extensive amount of time discussing this matter. In reading the comments on BR Bullpen, most people HAVE agreed that it does not satisfy the requirements laid out in WP:EL.  It is a wiki, it does not seem to be stable, and it does not seem to have a tremendous number of users.  With regards to fangraphs, it is a site that has been spammed by essentially on or two users.  So far, the best argument for its' inclusion in the external link section is that people can look at graphs.  While this is something to be considered, at this time, it is simply duplicate information that can be found on a number of other sites that are more widely used.  I am all for a general consensus, I am not for a concensus generated by two or three people who clearly have an agenda (i am not including you in this).  But these same people have insisted on the removal of unique links from Shoeless Joe Jackson and a number of other places.  //Tecmobowl 03:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I appreciate the heads up on the 3rr. I'm having a difficult time following the objectives of wikipedia when users like Epeefelche refuse to follow guidelines.  Much like the earlier statements i left here, I think the biggest problem is that he and the other editor most in support of the fangraphs site have spread the discussion to so many places, it is hard to follow.  I don't know who has seen what and who i told what to.  At this point, i think if i get banned, then so be it.  It will show the failure of wikipedia to allow for a community to address an issue like this. //Tecmobowl 14:16, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Robert M. Gordon.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Robert M. Gordon.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

AFD nomination
Ok, so you don't disagree with its deletion.But the real issue I was getting at is the fact that it had atleast 3 AFd nominations,and one was no consenusu, 2 were delete, and in the end it was delete.Do you disagree with nominating it 3 times for deletion in one year, because if not then how can you be hypocritical and say nominating Jurassic Park IV a second time was wrong.(Archived Deletions).Rodrigue 16:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Unblock
OK, done. Guy (Help!) 21:53, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter - Issue 9

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. — Vsh Bot (t • c) 16:43, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Salk School of Science
I would just like to thank you for your support of my article, Salk School of Science. I rarely use Wikipedia for creating articles, and I appreciate your help in arguing to keep the article. Termin8er850 00:26, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

WP:RfA
I would like to nominate you so that you could become an administrator. Would you accept or not? NHRHS2010 Talk  02:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Category problem
User:Alansohn/B. H. Carroll Theological Institute is still in Category:Unaccredited institutions of higher learning. I have never seen something from a user space in the main Wiki space, can you explain? Joie de Vivre 12:05, 11 June 2007 (UTC)


 * You had me baffled. I looked at the user article and there were no categories?!?!? Until I checked the history, and saw that you had answered your own question. I had deliberately nowiki'ed out the categories, but hadn't realized that the unaccredited template had a category of its own, built in. Thanks for solving the issue. Alansohn 12:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)


 * No problem. I actually created a new template called template:Unaccredited-Christian which includes the article in the Christian subcat, so you can use that if the page ever goes live.  Joie de Vivre 13:01, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Hawtree/Howard Beach/Coleman Square
I was actually really surprised by the Coleman Square article - that square was, well, laughable. Originally the Howard Beach article actually stated commuters were spending the $10 to take the air train from JFK during layovers to visit the shops at Coleman Square. If that was the case, there must be quite a few disappointed layovers. I added the photos to the articles because I figured, "Why not?" but conceivably Hawtree Creek could be merged -- I didn't put a tag on it because I wondered if the creek itself might be notable; probably not. But I had no qualms with the notability tag for Coleman Square. I'd merge myself, but I'm officially on Wikivaction and trying to keep my edits low. Thanks for the nice note. --David Shankbone 15:38, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

List of city nicknames in the United States
I am aware that the list was cluttered by the fact tag additions; that was the point. Putting all those tags on might convince a few people to actually go through and REFERENCE the stuff already there, and might cause one or two people who would otherwise throw something up to look for a cite. The list is a nice concept, but it's been smothered in slobber. I'll wait a week and strip out every single unreferenced claim on that page. That tag at the top isn't worth the pixels with which it is displayed. Horologium t-c 03:08, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

An interesting article. A font of trivia that I'll be studying more closely. But there is at least one item missing. In contrast to NYC, "The city that never sleeps", there is Jersey City, NJ, or any other NJ suburb of NYC that you want to pick on: "The city that never sweeps." Baseball Bugs 03:14, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Rather than a lisp, I think you meant Elmer Fudd style, whose L's and R's are "twoubwesome" to say the least. I did a quick check on Google and there are endless references to NYC-area cities with that nickname, as well as NYC itself. Oy. Baseball Bugs 03:46, 13 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes, I was more than a little abrupt in my first comment, for which I apologize. That list got me a little exercised, and your reversion (while certainly justifiable) prompted me to vent. I was wrong.


 * When I went through and tagged, I was somewhat selective, believe it or not; I skipped well-known (yet unsourced) names such as "Hotlanta", "Chi-Town", and "City by the Bay". I deleted "First Coast" from Jacksonville when I encountered it because it is the name for the entire region, not just the city. (Look at the last comment in the WikiProject Florida page; it's from me, and it discusses the First Coast region, among others. I am familiar with Florida--grin.) I also deleted at least one BLP-vio nickname (which is probably back because of the revert; I haven't checked). A lot of the nicknames that aren't sourced at this point will never be sourced, which is why a thorough housecleaning is in order. Horologium t-c 03:48, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Clayton HS
Hey Alansohn I noticed you're the one who created most of the South Jersey high school pages. However, there is no Clayton High School page. When I searched for it the closest thing that came up was Clayton Middle/High School which has no official page. Is there any way that you can delete that and create "Clayon High School (New Jersey)"? I feel that the "Middle" in "Middle/High School" is unnecessary...if anything it could be Clayton Junior-Senior High School like you did for Woodbury's page. I'd help edit the Clayton one whenever possible. Thanks. -jrcla2
 * Thanks for the encouraging message. Morgan Wick obviously has a vendetta against either you or Clayton Middle/High School. Perhaps she is the one who initially created it and got it deleted and now she is feeling resentful? As you noticed Morgan tried to claim that we were "promoting" Woodbury High School's page as soon as I mentioned in the CHS talkpage that I like to edit it. She is seriously demented and obviously rides power trips via friggin' wikipedia. People like you (and me I suppose) try to give things time, let them develop (which it would have) and do corrections/additions with good intentions and progressiion in mind. I like to hop around all the South Jersey high schools and add little factoids and/or links here and there whenever I find them, but people like Morgan hate that apparently. I'm not from Clayton nor do I have any true relations with the city or high school, but I can guarantee that as time passed I would be contributing whatever I could when I find it (as will be the case with all the other high schools). Hopefully it stays on wikipedia, but if not, we tried. By the way, I did create two entries: Dave Budd and H. Browning Ross (Woodbury grads of course), but I only knew how to do that because a user named Geniac helped me when I asked him how to do it. I just wanted to let you know that in case some idiot actually researches it and tries to call you out on the talkpage. Take care.-jrcla2
 * EDIT: I just read Morgan Wick's profile...the Asperger Syndrome explains his horrible demeanor, but is still no excuse to be an unswaying jerk when it comes to pointlessly deleting new entries.

venhobidofsishoff?
thank you for warning me bello. frelinghuysen middle school does not have any information on it bello and i'm like oh dio! so i added some information about the school and said bellisimo! --Bruttafemmina 02:01, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Ricci
My revert was inadvertent and automatic - I always separately categorize non-graduates. I didn't see that you had included her until after I made the change yesterday.

I don't understand why it is important to lump Ricci, who may have never even attended Morristown-Beard, in with true diploma holding alumni. Having her recognized is nice, I suppose, but alumnae? The same with anyone else who might have briefly attended. Hard to see where she could have fit school in if you check her bio. Student7 14:47, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

WP:NJSCR newsletter 4

 * Want to help on the next newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it transcluded next time? – It's all here.

Preston High School
You've done a better job on the article than the people of Preston County have in maintaining the schools themselves. I don't have links, but the The Dominion Post (Morgantown) had pictures last week of the condition of one of the middle schools. A damaged chimney necessitated a closure, but the school was in a very sorry state already. The voters of Preston County have not had a good record when it comes to school bond issues. DarkAudit 17:26, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

List of Largest Heists
You replied that the source did not nessesarly list the largest heists, because it is television.Well I also know about this source, but I was reluctant to use it because its a blog website, but it looks professionally written, and as far as I can tell, accurate.Would that one be better? Rodrigue 19:39, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Still-unrefernced bios
The bios you wanted to keep here (James William McGhee and Maria Hart) still have no hint of evidence of notability, and are mostly unsourced, written by a relative; and still have obvious COI issue like the one you voted to delete. Since you argued that they were notable, could you try to add the evidence please? Or should we try AfD again? Dicklyon 05:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Explain please
This looks like vandalism. Can you explain the deletion of the comment? (Why did you not delete the comment here  as well?) Actually, don't waste your time answering, just restore the comment and add whatever colorful commentary you feel is appropriate. I remind you that you can always report suspicious activity to the WP:ANI, which is the proper recourse - not deleting comments. Eusebeus 12:39, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * At no time have I ever deliberately deleted anyone's comments, regardless of their lack of content. If you have an issue that some comment of your's is missing, reinsert it, which is the appropriate course of action. Other than that, your comments are not welcome here on my talk page. Any further intrusions will be treated as vandalism. Alansohn 13:41, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Clayton High School
Yes, we have problems with CSD and nominating things too fast, and improving articles under time pressure--its a conflict between not catching junk fast enough and giving good articles time to develop, and I agree that the current balance is not very satisfactory. Finding practical ways to change it is not all that easy, and new ideas are very welcome. But for the moment, this article does not have enough content and this makes it unkeepable--and of course it will need references also, and for local schools that's usually harder. If you cant fix it quickly, why not let it be deleted, and if you can find enough material, then write it again--but if its not improved, people do notice. And there is no point in teasing your opponents--it's too easy. Just let him be and write a good article, whenever. DGG 06:45, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

5000 edits
I am the one who wanted to nominate you to be an admin, and I am also the one who started few of the New Jersey related articles. I just made my 5000th edit. NHRHS2010 Talk  02:08, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Stanley Jefferson article
Thank you for your work on the Stanley Jefferson article. I'm sorry if I reverted some of your edits. Please accept my apologies, as this was done inadvertently. I ran into a lot of editing conflicts while editing this article, as we were probably making edits simultaneously! I'd like to ask you to help me make sure that the photo of Mr. Jefferson which I added to the article is not deleted by Wikipedia for "copyright infringement". Any help that you might be able to provide to prevent it's possible deletion will be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Citizen Dick 03:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: schools
Thanks for your note. I've admired the work you've done at AfD:Schools, too (and especially the improvements you've made to school articles). I think ultimately the best thing we can do is make our arguments in the deletion discussions and, when we have some support, get enough support to change WP:ORG or WP:N to recognize that high schools, like hospitals and communities, are just inherently notable. A while back, we seem to have had more support for that (although I could be wrong, I think the current group of people at the deletion discussions is less supportive). I think when we gather enough support again, we should make that move, and I'll contact you when the time seems ripe.

Too often, I let arguments on Wikipedia get under my skin. I think we should both be careful of that, because we're more likely to garner support over time if we avoid it. I have to say though, you were baited (purposefully or not) with that three-minute deletion. I do think that our position is the way Wikipedia is trending over time, in fact, I think it's inevitable that as Wikipedia grows, all high schools and most other schools will have their own articles. We can afford to be patient. Noroton 02:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

June 2007
Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as described here, you may be blocked. Thewinchester (talk) 06:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Crews school
I'll add the Intel one and maybe one other. If you have time, I'll leave the rest to you. I also took out the names of the teachers. Noroton 17:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Please tell me what you think of this (feel free to edit it)
By mistake, I stuck this at the bottom of your User page. I just caught that mistake and removed it. Sorry. When you get a chance, please tell me what you think:

User:Noroton/draft proposal

Thanks, Noroton 04:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Yonah Shimmel
I feel a little bad about slapping the advert tag on this article (even though it richly deserved it), as it prompted an AfD. The restaurant is certainly notable and have voted to keep. Your very good edits should lay the matter to rest.--Mantanmoreland 02:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Hey
Could you do a favor, and not bite the newbies? Kwsn (Ni!) 22:38, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

NJTransit Train maps
Nice work on the route guides for the Bergen Line and Main Line. These will work well to provide a visual guide to the lines and their stations. New Jersey seems to be coming along well, at least on Wikipedia. Alansohn 18:35, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I saw one of those templates on a UK rail line and thought I'd give it a try here.  I've not been able to contribute much recently (new job), but apparently pages are not suffering since you've been patrolling a wide swatch of pages.  And you still find time to make improvements.  I don't know how you do it. :)  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 20:37, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Gateway Regional
Thanks for differentiating between the two districts. I'm still a little new to this. Cheers! --Mthompsongrsd 02:72, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

User:Tecmobowl
I see you reverted one of his many recent deletions of links. Having now been proven by a second checkuser to have used User:El redactor as a block-evading sockpuppet, he has basically gone ape, throwing the f-word at admins and me and so on. I don't much like having the f-word thrown at me, as he did on Cy Young talk page, but it's only words, not sticks-and-stones. Baseball Bugs 17:30, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * You might want to give his Contribs list a look. My guess is he's venting his frustrations by doing as much damage as he can before he gets permanently blocked. Baseball Bugs 18:01, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * He has now bought himself a 1-week suspension. It might take that week just to undo the damage he's done... but what happens when (or if) he comes back? Baseball Bugs 23:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Request for Comment
An RfC has been posted. Requests for comment/Alansohn. Eusebeus 00:48, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Responding to this might be a good idea. ObiterDicta ( pleadings • errata • appeals ) 23:51, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

DYK
Number 2 (2 create/expand - 0 nominations)