User talk:Alanvince9

Speedy deletion nomination of The Roth Law Firm
A tag has been placed on The Roth Law Firm requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accounting4Taste: talk 18:24, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Copyright
I note that you've asserted that you created the above-captioned page and that you release its associated copyright. I believe there's just a little bit more that has to happen: according to the policy that I'll copy here for your convenience, "If you hold the copyright to this text and permit its use under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License and the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License: Explain this on this article's discussion page, then either display a notice to this effect at the site of original publication or send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en at wikimedia dot org or a postal letter to the Wikimedia Foundation. These messages must explicitly permit use under the GFDL and the cc-by-sa license. (See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more.)"  I've copied the permission to the article's discussion page, but the second half of the permission is up to you. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to leave me a note. Accounting4Taste: talk 20:14, 31 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Upon further review, the article has been replaced by the standard copyright investigation template, as the permission statement posted on the article's talk page is not sufficient. In order to resolve this, you are invited to complete the steps highlighted at WP:DCM. Please also note that by donating any text to Wikipedia, you cannot reserve any rights not explicitly granted by WP:CC-BY-SA, nor can you object in any way or form beyond normal editorial conduct (see WP:BRD) to the modification, reuse or deletion of the material you donate.
 * The donation is irrevocable, will transfer down to any site mirroring Wikipedia, and also implies that potential modifications of the article to reflect any potentially negative evolution to your organization (should one such ever happen) can be added at any time provided it meets our inclusion policies, without any specific recourse to you to prevent this from happening.
 * Following WP:DCM is an acknowledgement from you that you fully measure the consequences of your donation, as it isn't a light decision to make. If this is not acceptable to you, the article will be removed from Wikipedia within 7 days from now, without any further action required on your part. MLauba (talk) 10:48, 7 August 2009 (UTC)


 * As has been stated, all text on Wikipedia is immediately released into the public domain upon entry. The process for releasing copyright on text from other websites requires the steps given above. However, at present, I have been unable to find any direct copyright violation for the text in this article, so I have removed the investigation template. Of course, this doesn't relieve the article of addressing the other noted concerns about conflict of interest, Notability and proper referencing. — Cactus Writer |   needles  10:42, 11 August 2009 (UTC)