User talk:Alanwong43

List of High Grade Universal Century Century plastic models
A tag has been placed on List of High Grade Universal Century Century plastic models, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of List of High Grade Universal Century Century plastic models and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

HGUC kits page
Thanks for making the High Grade Universal Century page. Looks like you have beaten me since I'm also making one since June of this year. Again, Congratulations :) E Wing 14:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Figma
A tag has been placed on Figma, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. NJGW (talk) 08:37, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I had replied to you on the article's talk page, but it then got deleted. Basically I said there are no sources at news.google.com that can be used  to verify that the topic is notable.  I tried to find some before I placed the tag.  NJGW (talk) 16:20, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Additional Reply: I was working to delete the HGUC entry created by myself as I also found similar issue. The MG and the GFF are not sure as ther are not created on my own.Alanwong43 (talk) 04:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Alanwong43

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)