User talk:AlbaPhy

Welcome to Wikipedia, please help make the Time crystal article better
Although I want you to discuss your proposed change to Time crystal on its talk page, I am glad you are here and hope you will keep on editing!

Wikipedia's editing by consensus can be a slow process, and one of its pillars is "Bold, Revert, Discuss" (abbreviated as WP:BRD.) Anyone can make a Bold new edit to an article, but in case of dispute the earlier (consensus) state of the article is kept until a new consensus is reached to include it or otherwise to modify the article in response to new information.

The current paragraph about the equilibrium proof is already not very good, and adding your sentence to it doesn't fix the things that are wrong with it. What we need as a source to cite is an independent secondary source (e.g. a review article not co-authored by any of the authors being discussed.) Since the paper you cite was published in 2020, has any more recent work by others discussed the "proof" issue in wider context? I started a discussion on the talk page so people besides us can Discuss and reach consensus. HouseOfChange (talk) 23:41, 10 November 2022 (UTC)