User talk:Albaniakosova14

January 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 20:15, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

My removal was how it used to be and that it was confirmed by sources, yet PhilipCrouch consistently keeps on deleting my reverts and he gives no reason to why he had changed the whole page Albaniakosova14 (talk) 20:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * My apologies!  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 20:44, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at International recognition of Kosovo, you may be blocked from editing. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 13:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

How did i disrupt it? It is sourced content. You are the one that is disrupting the page. Albaniakosova14 (talk) 13:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at International recognition of Kosovo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

You guys were the ones that deleted my work. I wasnt deleting your work. And i didnt revert anything more than three times. However, check the source again its very clear what Comoros states but ur probs a serb so what did i even expect Albaniakosova14 (talk) 14:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 13:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)