User talk:Albano512/sandbox

Patrick's peer review of the rambutan page
One thing I think worth looking at is all the sources cited. For example, citation 5 about the Vietnamese name doesn't actually have that, and the citation from Fruitpedia doesn't exist. My page is similar.

I think there's a pretty good structure as it is. The intro paragraph tells me all the basics I think I need to know about rambutan, including relatives. I'm thinking pretty hard about what I'd like to know about rambutan, and it looks like the page has it all. Economics, ideal growing conditions, distribution, and description. Maybe there's more history that can be added in, but I think if all of the claims in the article are backed up by solid sources, it'll be a good article. Pthesken (talk) 04:15, 23 February 2019 (UTC)