User talk:Albeheary

Welcome!
Hello, Albeheary, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Siobhan Kierans, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Hell in a Bucket (talk) 14:53, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Siobhan Kierans


The article Siobhan Kierans has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 14:53, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Siobhan Kierans for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siobhan Kierans is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Siobhan Kierans until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 15:08, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

OK, Folks, I have no clue how to cite the resources. I tried a few times and that's why I'm deleting the comments because it's meaningless to me without the help. Could you please help me? I'm brand new to this and trying to fix it so deleting my articles (Especially my first ever) is not helping me. I feel like I'm being ambushed here. Thanks a million.


 * You may wish to move it to your sandbox. It will allow you to work on it without having to worry about deletion or other people working on the article until you are ready to solve it. The easiest way to do references is use www.irl.com and then use to show them. This right here will be your best friend Help:Cheatsheet Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:35, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Listen, I appreciate your help, but I don't even know how to move it to the sand box. I deleted all of it. This was quiet an ambush here on this site. Thanks a million for your help.


 * I would have been glad to assist in moving the page, had it not been a copyright violation. The violation left no other option but to delete the page entirely. —C.Fred (talk) 17:41, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:23, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Siobhan Kierans


A tag has been placed on Siobhan Kierans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.theconclave.com/includes/news_items/8/news_items_more.php?id=57&section_id=8. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —C.Fred (talk) 17:31, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Siobhan Kierans has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; instead, use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. Katieh5584 (talk) 17:36, 21 March 2014 (UTC)


 * It is generally bad form to blank a page. However, in this instance, I took it as a request to delete the page entirely, and I have deleted it. In the future, please add the db-author template to any page, where you're the sole substantive contributor to the page, if you'd like it deleted. —C.Fred (talk) 17:40, 21 March 2014 (UTC)