User talk:AlbertHall

THOMAS (neuroscience)
I see you have proposed THOMAS (neuroscience) for deletion. I did the same last year, but since that was removed, you may have to go through the WP:AFD process --Rumping (talk) 19:11, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

THOMAS (neuroscience)
I didn't see the earlier PROD that had been removed (which would disqualify the article for a PROD deletion). However, I have removed the PROD for a different reason, discussed on the article talk page. The theory, unsubstantiated though it may be, seems to be notable, based on the sources cited. The article might need substantial clean-up: removal of sources that do not mention the theory, addition of WP:MEDRS sources disputing the theory, etc. But it looks notable. If it isn't notable, it needs to go through an AfD. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 21:02, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of THOMAS (neuroscience) for deletion
The article THOMAS (neuroscience) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/THOMAS (neuroscience) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.--Rumping (talk) 09:34, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate
Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Feel free to participate.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:
 * Publish an article to the journal.
 * Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
 * Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
 * Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
 * Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
 * Apply to become the treasurer of the journal
 * Join the editorial board.
 * Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
 * Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
 * Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
 * Ceština, Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano, 한국어, Português, Slovenšcina, Suomi, Svenska, Ελληνικά, Русский, العربية, 日本語
 * Technical work like template designing for the journal.
 * Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to . If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at.
 * Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

 D ip ta ns hu Talk 13:18, 11 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.

Pesticide topics
Kingofaces43 (talk) 00:48, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Please pay special attention to the 1RR restriction. Part of the intent of that restriction that was to prevent what you did at glyphosate by trying to edit war back in content when initially challenged instead of gaining consensus for it. Now that you are aware of it, I highly suggest undoing the revert. Kingofaces43 (talk) 00:49, 26 September 2018 (UTC)