User talk:AlbertaSunwapta

A welcome from Emersoni
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:


 * If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Enjoy your stay with Wikipedia!

Emersoni 23:52, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Naming format
Hi...I see you're fairly new here, so you may not know this, but our naming format on Wikipedia for geographical articles actually doesn't include the word Canada at the end, we normally just use "Place, Province" (or even just "Place" if the place is unquestionably the most important place with that name.) In fact, we already had an article at Amber Valley, Alberta, so you didn't need to write one up at "Amber Valley, alberta, canada". I hope that information helps you find things a bit more easily. Thanks. Bearcat 08:00, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. Seems a rather inexact practice that should be revised but I can live with it. Now, as for the new information I added under the wrong title - where can it be found to transfer over to the older page?AlbertaSunwapta 18:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC)AlbertaSunwapta

AfD Nomination: Rare automotive features
An editor has nominated the article Rare automotive features for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Articles for deletion/Rare automotive features. Add four tildes like this &tilde;&tilde;&tilde;&tilde; to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Rare automotive features during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Jayden54Bot 21:49, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Samantha Savage Smith
Don't get me wrong, I agree that she probably is notable enough in principle — even I've heard her on the CBC and downloaded a couple of her MP3s — but the original version of the article just wasn't doing a good enough job at explaining her actual notability according to the expectations of WP:NMUSIC. The references you've added to the new version are more solid, so while the article will probably still get a bit of cleanup attention it's a much more satisfactory start this time, and I'll gladly contribute what I can to make it even better. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 00:45, 6 June 2012 (UTC)