User talk:Albertpda

I just wanted to say that this person is a complete loser. I have seen dozens of their fake accounts deleting good information for no reason and they should really re-evaluate their life and the amount of time spent doing damage to articles that is undone almost instantly. If you are reading this Albertpda, maybe there is no one in your life to tell you this like friends or family or a significant other (it's pretty obvious actually) but you should take your meds, go outside and touch grass, and stop ruining nice things. No one wants you here anymore. Go do something else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wkpdsrnm2023 (talk • contribs) 02:28, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello Albertpda and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Vietnam national football team, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ; this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 00:34, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Only warning: stop blanking, and start discussing on talk pages, or you will be blocked. Drmies (talk) 00:39, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Vietnam national football team. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Softlavender (talk) 01:42, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment, or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button Signature icon april 2018.png located above the edit window.

Thank you. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  02:31, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  02:49, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Softlavender (talk) 04:02, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 04:28, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppet Investigation
There is a sockpuppet investigation involving you.  IWI  ( chat ) 13:08, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.  IWI  ( chat ) 13:52, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Albertpda unblock requests

 * (Non-Administrator-Comment) We need a Checkuser reviewing this case, so be patient if it takes some time. Also, your account is not only blocked for being a sockpuppet, it was blocked indef at first for being WP:NOTHERE (see above Sections), so you need to adress that in order to get unblocked. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:24, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Is there anyone doing the review? Please be quick, so I can get back and get into the work as soon as possible. It is important.Albertpda (talk) 11:26, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

"So then I have to use socks" Well, that pretty much seals the deal. No admin is going to unblock when this user clearly still doesn't remotely get it. Not that it matters at this point, but this user still hasn't addressed lying about the sockpuppetry. Anyway, if I hadn't already reviewed an earlier request, I'd decline this one. --Yamla (talk) 11:10, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Further unblock discussion as I've already declined once

 * Your block log is public. We can see this wasn't your first offense. "Biasity" is not a word. Another admin will be along shortly to review your unblock request. I suggest to that admin that they revoke your talk page access if they decline your request. Five unblock requests is more than enough. If your talk page access is revoked, you would still be able to access WP:UTRS six months from today, if you refrain from all further edits and sockpuppetry during that time. --Yamla (talk) 16:34, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * So sorry. I cannot unblock you at this time. Your current request has once again not fully addressed the reasons for your block. The amount of railing against others and complaining about the "injustice of it all" is not only quite phenomenal, it is off-putting as well. It reads more like a legal pleading than an unblock request. Please tell us what you would do under similar circumstances to not edit war and avoid blockable behavior. Please be concise and succinct. BTW.  Why is it important that you be unblocked quickly? Oh. Good. Grief. Sockpuppet_investigations/Albertpda/Archive shows you were socking in December? Really? Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive996 paints a grim picture. User_talk:Drmies&oldid=868737181#What_is_your_authority? shows an inability to function in a collaborative environment, as does Talk:Vietnam_national_football_team (You wanted a deeper review? I've made it.) You will need to deal with these behavior issues. Further, I would not unblock you without a TBAN on Viet Nam and soccer.-- Dloh cier ekim   (talk) 17:48, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note to next reviewing admin Please read and reread thoroughly the prior unblock requests and other discussion to savor the full flavor.-- Dloh cier ekim   (talk) 17:52, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * See also Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Albertpda-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 18:00, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * It's my first offend because this is the first time I'm blocked. You just keep asking me to state the reasons for my block, now you asked me to do it "fully". I'm not sure how more "fully" could it be according to your demand. Well, I have spoken the reasons, not once but perhaps three or four times already. If according to you, of course I have to "rail" against anyone else if I want to defend myself regardings certain points. This is not a legal pleading, this is an unblock request that has all requirements other admins had asked me to pledge to. If I get on similar circamstances again, I will make smaller and slower changes that is a part of the "big" change, rather than a "big" change that "need a consensus", and it still generated doubts for me, so I will debate it further using the talk page, not the edit tool. It is important that I should be unblocked quickly, and I should not get a TBAN because those pages I suppose to edit desperately need urgent modifications, those modifications are not that big and are required right now, also the pages like Vietnam team's one are at rush hour of possible new edits hence could be easily vandalized, or unsuitable changes just keep on coming hence I could be a useful guard that protect the page. Those are the only pages I can think of that I know what to contribute positively. To sump up, the main thing I regret having done is constantly reverting reverts using the edit tool but not talk pages, for this I will change. Also if one found my words to be some how "agressive" on some occasion, it is because I did not restrain myself during conflict debate very well, but I will try to be less so.Albertpda (talk) 00:37, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * As a hint for your next unblock request in six months (if you make one), it is not just "big" changes that require consensus - *all* changes that are contested/reverted require consensus, however large or small they are. And breaking a large change down into a set of smaller ones does not change anything - if the overall change is contested, it needs consensus. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:24, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Since I've already declined a previous unblock request, I will observe that any unblock request that seeks to justify sockpuppetry and which appears to blame your problems on another editor's gender cannot succeed..  Acroterion   (talk)   11:08, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 01:43, 14 January 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 04:54, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Last trip to the well

 * Comment: Reading all of the 9+ unblock requests on this page, I think this user is beyond redemption at this point, with an IDHT problem that reaches CIR. To prevent further disruption, I'm going to suggest revoking TP access and email access. Softlavender (talk) 09:40, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but does this comment qualify as a personal attack?Albertpda (talk) 09:50, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Given that I fully expect the unblock request above to be declined (I would have done so myself if I hadn't already responded to an earlier appeal) and given that I see no likelihood of you composing a competent or cogent unblock request in the near future, I have removed your talkpage access as suggested by Softlavender. And for the record: no, pointing out that you lack the competence to edit here when you have repeatedly demonstrated that you lack the competence to edit here is not a personal attack. Yunshui 雲 水 10:23, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Damn. I had such high hopes when I restored TPA. So many trips to the well. Note to next UTRS reviewer-- unless the next ticket adequately addresses the problems, recommend withdrawing that option. When one goes to the well, one must bring a bucket w/o a hole in it. Rhetorical question-- what happens if we run out of unblock reviewers.  Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:55, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
 * No,, that is a (valid) observation of your content. You have, again, not addressed the reasons for your block. You have, actually, given indication that your disruption would only continue. That you have (again) made a request with content you do not recognize as inappropriate on Wikipedia raises insurmountable CIR issues. You have had far more opportunities to request unblock than we afford most.  Dlohcierekim (talk) 11:04, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

To prevent further time-wasting, I to site ban this editor for repeated sock puppetry and block evasion. Albertpda, please see our policy page about site bans to understand what this means. This change is mostly bureaucractic except that no administrator can unblock you without the permission of the community. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:42, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Ban evasion
This user engaged in ban evasion as in February, 2020. --Yamla (talk) 11:08, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

-- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:35, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I note the suggestion above to revoke UTRS access, but as it's been quite a long time since then I left it for perhaps one more chance. But I did warn that no request will be considered for at least six months from the latest socking (so not before August 2020), and any further request before then should probably lead to UTRS revocation. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:41, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Further ban evasion today, 2020-09-24, as. Albertpda has lost access to UTRS for six months. Their final avenue of appeal is to email arbcom-en@wikimedia.org, which does not require an account. --Yamla (talk) 01:07, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

N.B. -> ; special:permalink/979880478 -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 12:22, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Another premature UTRS request in. I advised them to wait six months. As they have a hard time determining how long six months is, that'd be 2021-12-26, assuming no more sockpuppetry between now and then. --Yamla (talk) 10:17, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

I modified the block to allow talk page access. Albertpda wishes to request WP:UNBAN. They will post here to confirm this and then I will copy their request to the noticeboard. Alternatively, Albertpda may decide to hold off on making an unban request, in which case they are expected to refrain from any editing of this talk page until they are ready to contest their ban. --Yamla (talk) 15:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Albertpda, if you are unable to edit here because you are globally locked, please either respond via the UTRS ticket or send me an email (which I will read but not respond to). You need to specifically indicate you will not edit anywhere other than this page, including on other projects. I will then attempt to get your global lock lifted solely so you can contest this ban on en.wiki. --Yamla (talk) 15:10, 28 March 2024 (UTC)