User talk:Albyr02

February 2015
Hello, I'm Qed237. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to David de Gea because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! QED237&#160;(talk) 16:38, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rogério Ceni. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. QED237&#160;(talk) 16:39, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to David de Gea with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 02:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Rogério Ceni, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Rogério Ceni was changed by Albyr02 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860017 on 2015-02-09T07:43:52+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 07:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)