User talk:Alcobraxi

July 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bianca Williams, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.  not an improvement - your additions were unsourced - some already covered by sourced text David Biddulph (talk) 18:20, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

But this is changing history to make someone seem better than they are. The police put out their report and no misconduct was taking place! I'm looking for sources and they've gone. This IS NOT ACCEPTABLE! Alcobraxi (talk) 18:25, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
 * No, this is ensuring that content included in articles is verifiable through the inclusion of reliable sources. Please read these two very important links explaining Wikipedia policy if you will be editing here. Thank you, -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:33, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

It's also perpetuating a lie. Wikipedia truly is as reliable as EVERYONE says it is. If you know ANYTHING about Bianca Williams or the 'stop', you would know this is MISLEADING and inaccurate Alcobraxi (talk) 18:35, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
 * The article already contains the sentences The Met released a statement, saying the vehicle Williams was travelling in had been on the wrong side of the road, and that the driver had sped off when asked to stop." and "They also said the Directorate of Professional Standards had reviewed footage from social media and officers' bodycams, and were satisfied there was no concern around the officers' conduct involved in the incident.". This covers the information you are adding--why are you adding duplication? If you think the existing text should be rephrased, I suggest starting a discussion on the talk page. BethNaught (talk) 18:55, 15 July 2020 (UTC)