User talk:Ald81

Welcome!
Hello, Ald81, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 22:52, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Logical Investigations
Hello, Ald81. Please review the comments I have left at Talk:Logical Investigations (Husserl). FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 22:53, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Ald81, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:42, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Editing while logged out
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Logical Investigations (Husserl) while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 03:14, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Personal attacks Using vandal blocking mode is intolerable on Wikipedia
I told you I am new. You are using my formal ignorance to punish the good in trying to fix a disastrous page that has no clear explanation of the value and importance. It is probably the misreading of the work by the last contributor. Blocking possibility to edit claiming I am vandal is a partisan analysis and a personal attach on me by the editorAld81 (talk) 03:20, 30 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello, Ald81. In regards to your comment above, could you please review WP:NPA, Wikipedia's policy against personal attacks. Thank you. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 03:23, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

I am not a vandal
I will pursue you legally and I am very rich and will not tolerate your claims of me being a Vandal by trying to fix the mess the page is. You put the name of vandal on me and I will pursue your Hegelian falsehoods. You are a historic revisionist that is blocking the correct and balanced view of husserl. You should be banned forever from all peer to peer knowledge reviewing systems. I will do what is in my power to fix this mess were small egos are used to spread lies on Wikipedia. Also i will be likely banned also means it depends on the substance of your and my argument. Yours like the encyclopedia builders 300 years ago isn’t in the first impression but is hidden in the wrinkles in your meta narrative, what you think but don’t write but still emerges from your mind to put it in simple terms. You use the technicality of Wikipedia to threaten people that are not knowledgable on how to edit wiki pages but have good intentions. You crowd out the knowledgeable due to the heavy unbalanced between your life and your archetype. You make knowledgeable people run away by trying to support your pityful vision where only English authors and their perspective is relevant. Laughable.like The comment of Bertrand russel. If he can’t digest a masterpiece it says more about the littleness of the latter than the greatness of the former. I urge you instead to get your head straight and to recognize that Husserl is the father of phenomenology a truism that only you and some dubious English thinkers puts in doubt by defending an aweful page. And I am a LSE Graduate. I thus recognize very well the smell of anglosaxon mental farts such as the current state of the page and of your bureaucratic hiding behind rules rather than Truth. If you can’t even understand that a book can give birth to a new method it’s because after Hegel there should no longer be new methods. But there are. I am sorry to sadden you with another truism. So let me do my job or I will do all that is in my power to fix this. And I am very very very very very very patient.

Ald81 (talk) 13:29, 31 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Ald81, I urge you to remove that comment immediately and to never make any kind of similar comment. Wikipedia has a strict policy against legal threats. Per WP:LEGAL: "If you post a legal threat on Wikipedia, you are likely to be blocked." FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 21:59, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 09:18, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GoldenRing (talk) 09:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Unblock
Who blocking me is unfit to say that Husserl is not the father of Phenomenology as he indisputably is all over respectable sources. Thanks to these Heglians Wikipedia is not reapectable. Until they get banned and free citizens can actually create knowledge and not these lies Ald81 (talk) 12:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

I would like to add to TomStar81's remarks above: Even if the legal threat is unilaterally and unconditionally withdrawn, your unblock requests and comments such as the above are no way to get yourself unblocked. I strongly suggest you read the guide to appealing blocks before you make another unblock request. Your ability to edit this page is provided solely for the purpose of making productive unblock requests; if you continue on your current course, this access will also be blocked. GoldenRing (talk) 13:45, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Huon (talk) 00:56, 2 April 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 14:55, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


 * In regard to the UTRS request above, administrators should note that Ald81 is actively evading his block, as is apparent from recent IP edits at Logical Investigations (Husserl). These geolocate to Italy; Ald81 previously edited the article while logged out, and those edits also geolocated to Italy. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 00:33, 14 April 2019 (UTC)