User talk:Aldebaran69/Archive 5

File permission problem with File:Jennifer Grant 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jennifer Grant 2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:46, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Aldebaran69! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:28, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Prince John Henry of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha -

File source problem with File:Anne Marie Victoire de Bourbon.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Anne Marie Victoire de Bourbon.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:55, 5 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:55, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

True Line of Succession
We group of scientists - historians and genealogists, which truly serve the true Royal. We serve the true successor of the Georgian Royal throne. Which has never refused His Royal rights. His line is a pure salic line back to the most important of all the kings. He is the real "fons honorum" and de jure king of Georgia. Because of the difficult political situations, in all the XX-th century, HRH Crown Prince Nugzar was not be able to create a royal orders of chivalry. But today He already is going to establish a true Royal Order of Chivalry. We all know that it is very important to rise the question firstly: Does the Order have a "fons honorum" ? meaning the headship of a "de jure" or reigning sovereign i.e. king or prince? Also, we all must to remember that only a true sovereign, regnant or "de jure," can create, restore or rehabilitate a title or bestow upon a person a real and true knighthood. All honors must spring from a genuine, authentic source or fountain of honor otherwise it must be rejected as worthless pretense.We call into question the validity an origin of those orders which are created in emigration by the family of Prince Irakly de Bagration-Mukhransky. We doubt about their legitimacy. Because, only one, who can establish the authentic orders of Georgian chivalry is HRH Crown Prince Nugzar of Georgia. Please, read the following: (a) King Giorgi XII is dies 1801(he is the last king and direct ancestor of HRH Prince Nugzar, and (b) Georgia annexed by Imperial Russia 1803: Imperial Russia exiles from Georgia to Russia all the representatives of HRH Nugzar's direct salic ancestors (the Royal family) 1804-1812: Imperial Russia adopted a decision that only Georgia's King`s sons and daughters preserve the titles of "Georgian princes and princesses" (Gruzinski) 1833: Imperial Russia adopted the second decision, the grandsons of King Erekle II and King Giorgi XII were granted a title of "Georgian prince" --- Gruzinski, which became their surname. 1865: Russian Emperor Alexander II granted all the representatives of this Royal branch of the Bagrationis (Prince Nugzar's ancestors) the title of "the Most Respectful" 1917: Russian Empire was abolished. HRH Nugzar's ancestors still retained their titles. None of them renounced their Royal rights or prerogatives! 1921: Georgia annexed by Soviet Russia. HRH Nugzar`s and HRH Anna`s ancestor Peter (I) still uses his title of "the Most Respectful Prince Gruzinski." Same with Peter (II), he was even jailed by communists in 1944-1951, but he never renounced his Royal rights. It is important to understand that no other line of kings exists for Georgia. HRH Prince Nugzar is the rightful lineal successor of the last King. When the Empire of Russia tragically abolished the throne in 1801, they exiled the royal family of HRH Prince Nugzar's ancestors. No one from the other lines (Bagrationi-Mukhranski, Bagrationi-Davitishvili, Bagrationi-Babadishi) were exiled to Russia, because everyone knew that they were high nobles and had no right or claim to the throne. For example, the Mukhranski branch of offshoot princes of the high nobility lost all sovereignty when Konstantin II, King of Kartli's (1478-1505) older son King David X (1505-1525) took the throne instead of their ancestor, the younger son, Prince Bagrat Mukhranbatoni (Mukhranski), who began the Bragrationi-Mukhranski branch of high nobles. No one of this cadet line has reigned over any kingdom since the time of King Konstantin II in 1505. They received recognition from Imperial Russia as " the Illustrious." Prince David Bagrationi-Mukhranski is from this line of non-reigning princes. With regards, Konstantine —Preceding unsigned comment added by Konstantine 001 (talk • contribs) 08:33, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Elisabeth of Hungary
I know it's been a while since we spoke about this but do you think Elisabeth, daughter of Charles I of Hungary and sister of Catherine of Hungary was married to Władysław Opolczyk? He stayed in Hungary when he married his first wife Elisabeth and her parents are disputed, the dates even fit. What do you say?--David (talk) 18:21, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Okay, thanks anyway. I've been trying to look for legitimate descendents of Klementia of Habsburg, possibly leading up to today and Elisabeth was my last hope--David (talk) 18:59, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * However being the daughter of Elisabeth of Poland would have also made her Piast--David (talk) 19:02, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Keni Styles.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Keni Styles.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. , and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
 * state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
 * add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Mohamed Magdy, Thank You! (talk) 22:27, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Lady Oscar.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Lady Oscar.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Lady Oscar.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Lady Oscar.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 00:12, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Keni Styles.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Keni Styles.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Keni Styles.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Keni Styles.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 00:12, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Motto of the Day
Hi there, Aldebaran69! Thought you might be interested in Motto of the Day, a collaborative (and totally voluntary) effort by a group of Wikipedians to create original, inspirational mottos. Have a good motto idea? Share it here, comment on some of the mottos there or just pass this message onto your friends.

MOTD Needs Your Help!

Delivered By –p joe f (talk • contribs) 09:24, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

When did Casimir die?
Since you wrote this article, perhaps you could explain what you meant by his death date. 98.82.21.78 (talk) 00:33, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Opinion
As a Peruvian, how do you feel about Alberto Fujimori? 98.82.21.78 (talk) 00:36, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:15, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

solecitud de traduccion para Our Lady of Coromoto
Feliz Día a ti desde la Lejana Calabria y moralmente de Venezuela, te escribo si puedes ayudarme con mi Artículo sobre la Virgen de Coromoto, de que soy un devoto después de que he recibido a una Gracia, o sea que me ha salvado de la muerte cierta acerca de hace un año. te escribo con mi pésimo español para preguntarte si amablemente pudieras corregirme el artículo con una escritura un algo más inglés. en cambio te traduciré en italiano y sus dialectos varios un artículo de tu interés, en la espera de una tuya cierta contesta te agradezco en antelación de verdadero corazón... saludos desde Campora San Giovanni y moralmente de Mérida♥--Lodewijk Vadacchino (talk) 10:45, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Charlene-wittstock-2.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Charlene-wittstock-2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.


 * It looks like you forgot to add a copyright tag to this image but the source indicates it is in fact a copyright image so unless you have the permission of the copyright holder it will likely be deleted. Good luck. 21:45, 27 November 2010 (UTC)ww2censor (talk)

Murad II
Hi, Aldebaran69, Please see my note on Talk:Murad II regarding your edits on the article in October 2008. Cheers. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 11:11, 6 December 2010 (UTC)