User talk:Aldo 5

November 2016
Hello, I'm Qzd. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Steve Borthwick have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Qzd (talk) 19:58, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stuart Lancaster (rugby union). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:04, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Stuart Lancaster (rugby union) was changed by Aldo 5 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954353 on 2016-11-22T20:04:29+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Saracens F.C., you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Saracens F.C. was changed by Aldo 5 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957756 on 2016-11-23T08:45:08+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:45, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Aldo 5, you are invited to the Teahouse!
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 05:05, 25 November 2016 (UTC)