User talk:Ale jrb/Archives/January 2017

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

RECENT EDIT
CLEARLY YOU FAILED TO READ THE EXPLANATION I LEFT FOR THE EDIT I MADE. THE EXPLANATION I LEFT WITH THE EDIT SHOULD BE SUFFICIENT. WIKIPEDIA NEEDS TO IMPROVE ITS USABILITY. AND YOU NEED TO READ BEFORE YOU RESPOND. OTHERWISE, YOU COME ACROSS AS AN IDIOT. DO NOT CONTACT ME AGAIN. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.44.34.206 (talk) 01:15, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Hey, I'm afraid you can't remove all the references on an article because one is broken - I checked reference 73 and it seems to be fine. A le_Jrb talk  01:22, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi guys. I have fixed that. There was a minor error. As noted however, removing all references isn't an appropriate way of fixing something. Nor is shouting at people. Or calling people names. All the best. Guliolopez (talk) 01:30, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

RE: MusicDealers
Hi Ale jrb,

Will you please guide me in revising the MusicDealers page to make it not a violation of Wikipedia? It was stated as unambiguous promotion. I was attempting to cite the details with credible sources. I can definitely shorten it to a few sentences, but could you please direct me?

Thank you in advance. 2601:40D:8104:D650:3C9F:DF4A:70E1:46DA (talk) 18:44, 3 January 2017 (UTC) Moda1099


 * Hi! First, thanks for contributing to Wikipedia - it's always great when new people get involved. One of the most important things to keep in mind when contributing is that we're trying to write an encyclopedia. That means that if an article would seem out-of-place in a printed encyclopedia such as Britannica, there's a good chance it's not suitable for us here either. Looking at the article, it seems like it was written primarily to advertise how awesome the service is, rather than objectively describing it from neutral point-of-view. For example, you describe the service as "revolutionary" which is an extrememly ambitious claim. To make that sort of claim, you would need several reliable sources that indicate exactly how and why the service caused a revolution in its industry, and the claim would then have to be attributed to the people making it in the context it was made. This generally holds true for all promotional-sounding phrases - remember that if you are personally involved with the company (you work for them, know the owner, were paid to write the article, etc.) then you have a conflict of interest and should read that page carefully.
 * With all that said, the best way to get started on a new article as a new user is to use the article wizard to make sure you don't miss anything important. Hope that helps! A le_Jrb talk  20:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi Ale My mother wrote this film and is not Ruth E Carter as previous entry of the film Coming Up Roses linked to. She is plain Ruth Carter. I have asked her to write a full biography with all her credits so will be revising and adding more soon. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.29.238.0 (talk) 21:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for telling me about the Sandbox!

Fuji Syusuke (talk) 21:29, 4 January 2017 (UTC)Fuji Syusuke

Blocking
i dont see why your threatening to block me when all of the things im adding are true as i know keith kettles grandson in real life and we went to the game were there was a minite of laughter you are just disrespectful for removing this fact — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshHaden98 (talk • contribs) 22:14, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Defamation and vandalism are not welcome on Wikipedia. Please review those policies if you intend to continue contributing. Thanks. A le_Jrb talk  22:20, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Constructive, shouldn't have removed it
My latest contribution was not unconstructive. The Platypus Network is a real YouTube channel, based in LaCrete. iRid3r and Rocky are 2 very real members that live just outside of LaCrete. You can watch a video if you want to check if it's real-https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCfxgs2wOInSzrv0naKvxVeg — Preceding unsigned comment added by BunnySlippers (talk • contribs) 22:50, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Sisua Edit
No Ale jrb it was not a test and it took me hours and hours and hours to find, check and put the information in I did. As far as I was aware all the things I put in about the festivals and food etc were relevant. That being said I am very new here and if I have made any mistakes I apologize. Rod Fathers (talk) 22:49, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * You're right, sorry about that. I've replied on your talk page and restored the changes, which the accidental copy-and-paste removed. A le_Jrb talk  22:57, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Benjamin Franklin
Sorry I reverted your recent edit. I thought I was reverting the preceding vandalism. I was mixed up I'm afraid. Problem is what link in watchlink email points to. Will be more careful in future.Regionrat1234 (talk) 03:15, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem at all. Best, A le_Jrb talk  09:36, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi, there seems to be two Jagannath temples and the page I am working on (Sisua village) has info on it from the temple at Puri and the temple at Sisua village. Its getting a little confusing and I may have made it worse without realising it. Rod Fathers (talk) 00:59, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

help me
as u have deleted my page assure invest solutions, can you please help me to create it once again without mistake, so that I dont get deleted again.

regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Travisingh (talk • contribs) 14:49, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I replied to your message on your talk page. A le_Jrb talk  20:04, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

About speedly delete page.
Hello sir i want that you would help me to creat my page because i previous time when i created it have deleteted by use perheps there was some mistake A7, company or industrial, pls suggest me how can i make that it would not delete in future.(Rishi Kumar Kushwaha (talk) 16:01, 12 January 2017 (UTC))
 * I replied to your message on your talk page. A le_Jrb talk  20:04, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Help me.
Sir! Good morning, sir pls suggest me how can safe my page that it will not delete under A7; i want creat a orgnaisation or company but it have deleted.(Rishi Kumar Kushwaha (talk) 02:54, 13 January 2017 (UTC)).

Why my article got deleted?
Hello ale Jrb, I would like to know the exact reasons behind my article deletion so I can improve my knowledge about writing an articles on Wikipedia. Awaiting for your favorable reply. Thanks & Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rayshigosher (talk • contribs) 11:59, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi there, and welcome to Wikipedia! This article was deleted because it met one of our speedy deletion criteria (specifically A7) that requires all articles contain at least one credible indication of why their subject is important to readers of Wikipedia - your article did not. In general, to decide whether a subject is notable enough to be included in Wikipedia, you should refer to the notability guidelines. The key point is that the "topic [must have] received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". If you would like to write about the website, you must find reliable third-party sources that have significantly covered the topic of your article. A le_Jrb talk  19:50, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello Ale, Thanks for the reply. This topic have received significant coverage in many reliable sources those are independent of the subject. Please check some reference below. This is the website I uses for so many years and that's why I personally wanted people to know this popular website. Also I have seen so many articles with same topic have been accepted and published by wikipedia (Please check for some of my favorite sites - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DealNews and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RetailMeNot). So I request you to accept my article. Awaiting for your favorable reply. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rayshigosher (talk • contribs) 05:21, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * 20+ tools for price watching and protecting
 * Lonely Planet USA By Jeff Campbell
 * Worry-free Family Finances: Three Steps to Building and Maintaining Your Family's Financial Well-being
 * Learn about EDealinfo.com and how to place your Udemy course coupons on this site.

Vineyard Park page deleted
Hi,

I created a page for my neighborhood Vineyard Park in Los Angeles and it got deleted. I couldn't figure out the system to verify the information. Even though I support and use Wikipedia, as an infrequent contributor I find the editing and creating part very hard to use. How can I get the page back and verify the information?

Thanks, Mark Jolles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjolles (talk • contribs) 07:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I have replied to this message on your talk page. A le_Jrb talk  20:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 January 2017
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:39, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

You are deleted my wiki page
please rewiev my page you deleted today, i do know when moveing my name in other page will be bring me to delet my page, please verify it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Handmadebyall (talk • contribs) 17:15, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I replied to your message on your talk page. A le_Jrb talk  17:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

You deleted my page
but i am creating my page why are you deleting it, i try to create it already 4 days and you are deleted it. it is my own company, where i am leave mistake that you deleted it, back my page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Handmadebyall (talk • contribs) 18:12, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Why are you deleting without reply? I am waiting your reply what to do for it without mistake, reply me, i don't do anything copyright or any violation mistakes, do for me any good. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Handmadebyall (talk • contribs) 18:49, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Sentence deleted
Hi,

I see that you found my sentence regarding critics on the misogyny and homophobia non constructive. As a college professor of gender studies, I find it worrying that you should think so. Would you have deleted it if it had been about racism or other matters of the representation of diversity? Please get back to me.

Thanks

Mulieribus

Ps. Here are references from serious publications addressing the issues I mentioned in the sentence you deleted. http://www.dailydot.com/parsec/sherlock-final-problem-review-eurus-finale/ http://www.indiewire.com/2017/01/sherlock-review-the-final-problem-season-4-episode-4-spoilers-finale-1201769310/

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.20.37.113 (talk) 20:59, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi. Unsourced material of the nature is added is typically vandalism, and you didn't include any sources in your edit. If you believe the material is constructive you should feel free to re-add, but you must include your references. See our verifiability policy for details. All the best, A le_Jrb talk  21:39, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

All done! Thanks Ale_jrb! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.20.37.113 (talk) 03:09, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

CSDH bug: Logging decline despite not declining
Hi Alex. Long time no see. I have recently dived back into WP and thus back into CSD work. Today, I noticed a bug with your still excellent CSDHelper script: The script does not check if the edit removing a speedy tag is successful before editing the speedy decline log. Thus this edit happened while another user actually had removed the tag before I clicked decline. Regards  So Why  21:11, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Hey! You're right, it's generally not very good at handling failures or unexpected events. I'll take a look. A le_Jrb talk  22:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC)