User talk:AlecStat71/Catherine D’Ignazio/Natalie elizabeth2 Peer Review

1. First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?

The article does a good job of explaining Catherine's work and education life. I especially liked the layout of the work section because it flowed well and gave a good sequential summary of her life.

2. What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?

I think the author could consider adding a family/home life and an awards section to the post.

3. What’s the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?

If possible, adding more references may help increase the amount of knowledge the article gives readers on the subject.

4. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know!

I noticed that the article specifically talks about the name of the book she published. I may have mentioned some of my person's titles in my article, but want to review it to see if I was as detailed as Alec Natalie elizabeth2 (talk) 05:00, 15 April 2020 (UTC)