User talk:Aleefazmir

Speedy deletion nomination of Alif Hilmi Azmir


A tag has been placed on Alif Hilmi Azmir, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GimliDotNet (talk) 06:57, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Alif Hilmi Azmir, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:43, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

To: user Boing! This is not an appropriate page. It really can't be understandable mentioning creating an inappropriate page.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeatedly recreating deleted pages after having been warned. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:17, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The deletion discussion was at Articles for deletion/Alif Hilmi Azmir, and you were given a link. Wikipedia does not host articles about non-notable people - have a read of WP:GNG. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:20, 29 March 2012 (UTC)


 * The article was deleted after community discussion at Articles for deletion/Alif Hilmi Azmir. You were given plenty of notifications, which you deleted (see history of this page). You did not take part in the deletion discussion, and you did not respond to this request to provide a source for the article. Instead you just repeatedly recreated it after it was deleted, and now you're arguing that the deletion was wrong. Now, firstly, if you wish to be unblocked, you need to convince a reviewing admin that you understand what happened and why the article was deleted, and that you will not create it again. And then, should you succeed in getting an unblock, you can request a review of the article's deletion at WP:DRV, but you *must not* simply keep recreating it. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:44, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Under Wikipedia's policies (See WP:N to learn about notability requirements), you do not qualify for an article about yourself. Should you be unblocked you could dispute the deletion of it at WP:DRV, but I don't think you have any realistic chance of succeeding, because you simply don't come close to meeting the Wikipedia notability guidelines. So, my suggestion is that you forget about writing an article about yourself, and instead have a think about what other things you'd like to do here. If you can convince the next admin who reviews your request that you have positive things to contribute instead of battling about this one article, they might be prepared to unblock you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:22, 29 March 2012 (UTC)


 * That's exactly what I meant actually. I'll contribute with any other sources. Actually this person is not me. I'm someone else from my state which I've been responsible to make a page for this person. Anyway just forget about it. So I'll be glad to give some other sources that is reliable because editing for reliable sources is my favorite as I am IT students. Please reconsider again my request. Tq.
 * You don't need to put every comment in a new unblock request - you already have one open above. Anyway, you are now unblocked, as per my comment above. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:05, 29 March 2012 (UTC)