User talk:Aleenf1/Archive 13

UEFA Champions League outdated information
Here we go, we're back at it. FBC didn't even show the Finals from last season (there's no need of any kind of communication for them, they just pulled out of the contract and don't plan to show any of the playoff matches, which they did last season as per contract), ELTA directly removed UCL section from their website (and don't plan to broadcast playoff matches, which they did last season as per contract) while for what concerns DAZN in SE Asia and Japan I already posted a source (which you ignored, but if you want here's another one). When will you accept the fact that the table needs to be updated? Most of the information is outdated, there are no criteria neither for inserting/deleting a broadcaster's name nor to distinguish a real broadcaster from another one that just relies on someone else signal (I mean, why did you delete the previous distinction between free and pay broadcasters? why are there the names of certain broadcasters which just use the signal of someone else - like for example Astro in Brunei and Malaysia- and the ones of others aren't inserted into the table - like for example LaLiga TV Bar or KLIK Sport in Serbia?). There're a couple of issues that need to be assessed, but as I can see you just revert every edit on that article. --151.50.193.169 (talk) 15:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)


 * To be honest, your claim based on the website, any "real" claim about that? If you mean use other signal, is that real and why they are broadcast on original channel of own? Because the pandemic, many doesn't honour the original contract, why don't wait until UEFA publish a whole new list? Just because not broadcasting the play-off? Lets get real you are guessing also, and here is about list of broadcasters, not a guide of free or pay tv that end up in the conflict of editing and also clashing (with same broadcasters). Here everything based on sources, not based on your own judgement. --Aleen f 1 12:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC)


 * First of all, the answer isn't clear, but...Are you talking seriously? UEFA won't publish any new list, and you know this very well. They never did a similar thing and the only list published is the one at the start of the new cycle of tv rights. Furthermore, since UEFA Champions League rights are sold along with UEFA Super Cup rights, all those broadcasters aren't even going to show UEFA Super Cup (look at their websites, schedules, read the news on the web for God's sake! Otherwise what are you talking about?!). Again, you included many broadcasters with the same signal of other broadcasters (Astro and BeIN for Brunei and Malaysia, BeIN, StarHub, MioSports for Singapore) but at the same time you excluded KLIK Sport from Serbia, Mitele Plus from Spain, QQ Sports from China, etc. The list is so long. What's the difference? Can you provide a proper explanation? You didn't answer me...I'm not guessing anything, the one who doesn't accept that things've changed are you: DAZN in SE Asia and Japan is a clear example. Not one but TWO sources and you still deny it. This isn't editing based on sources, but a dictatorship. Not to talk about the fact that I still don't know who decided that the table should be done in that way and exclude a distinction between free and pay TVs, which could be useful (but I guess you did everything based on your own decision). The page doesn't belong to any user, and every edit (except vandalism) should be discussed not reverted without any reason. The clear evidence has been the matter with Idman TV. --151.50.193.169 (talk) 18:20, 23 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Please raise a "constructive" evidence rather than your thesis here. Thank you. --Aleen f 1 22:54, 23 September 2020 (UTC)


 * That's it? I've posted two sources for DAZN SE Asia and Japan, what else do you want? You're denying facts. You only want to see what you believe is good, which is way different from the concept of constructive editing. I renew the invitation to answer my questions regarding the discrimination of some broadcasters and to address the problem of the table scheme (because you cannot take a decision on your own about all these matters). You're still not doing it. Otherwise I'm entitled to modify the page according to "my judgments" as you're doing, and this could easily lead to an edit war. --151.50.193.169 (talk) 02:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)


 * You can try to argue here but i'm not alone. --Aleen f 1 12:05, 24 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Who cares, I want an answer to my questions. Otherwise, I will delete again DAZN from SE Asia and Japan and the table will be modified again. Who did take the decision to delete the free/pay distinction? Was there a consensus for that or has it been a one-side decision? Why are there broadcasters relying on someone else signal and others doing the same are excluded? --151.56.216.157 (talk) 12:34, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Oh, look: another source here and here. How incredible is it when you find out that you're trying to keep on Wikipedia outdated information? Answer my questions above. You have to discuss with other users, you cannot do this. --151.26.120.138 (talk) 01:47, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

2014 LCW World Championships
Hey - new to Wikipedia editing so feel free to remove this (not sure if Wikipedia has a PM function). No complaints just curious why the addition of 2nd Place in the 2014 World Championship was reverted - I checked the bwf page and it is among his achievements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azdufs (talk • contribs) 20:22, 21 November 2020 (UTC)


 * It was stripped due to doping violation. --Aleen f 1 00:52, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Who is the problem?
Ask yourself why the discussion is still going on. I wrote already thousands of times that the problem concerns LaLiga TV Bar and KLIK Sport, I told you that those two broadcasters are in the same position of others already inserted in the table (Futbol TV and Uzreport for Uzbekistan) so if you're coherent you should either fix Uzbekistan or accept my edit (but that's too much for you). Instead you decided to revert everything again and went to cry for protection again. This shows that you don't understand what's the problem I'm discussing about, and that other users edits on that article are irrelevant to you (do you remember what you did with Japan, Fiji and Azerbaijan broadcasters? Either you steal what is good from other users edits after reverting them, so you can take credit for that, or you just ignore everything spreading wrong information on Wikipedia). Again: grow up, little baby. --37.163.41.239 (talk) 13:39, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

If you bully one more time you will be blocked unregistered user. Bullying is not allowed in the English Wikipedia. It is considered making of someone and it can reflect you to be blocked. So stop bullying. Bryson Johnson (talk) 21:18, 4 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Oh, this is bullying but what he does is perfectly okay LOL...You clearly want to see only what you want. Because if you were a bit more careful you would see what this psychopath is doing in that article: he's stolen the information, which he didn't even know about, from other users edits after he undid those same edits (read his answer here and look what happened here and here...he said:"I'm admitted I'm missed over the references,THAT'S WHAT I'M NEEDED"...I mean, what the hell are we talking about?!) and imposed his line of thought without providing a good explanation for that. I bet all this bullshit it's okay if it's Aleenf1 the one doing it, isn't it? Who the hell you think you playing? Unless you're a sockpuppet of this arrogant lad, get informed on what he really does with that article. Wikipedia isn't a dictatorship and he should work along with other users, not treat them like a doormat! --151.45.159.101 (talk) 10:12, 5 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The person who hide behind the IP address, not even dare to create an account, like never did the wrong before, and keep attacking people here. --Aleen f 1 11:43, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * P/S: You can ask for checkuser to check me, if not have evidence, do not "bull shit" here, as what you said recently. If you think what you contribute cannot be stole, do not contribute here, make your own encyclopedia, rather than turn to attack people when edits were reverted. --Aleen f 1 11:52, 5 November 2020 (UTC)


 * First of all, if I want to create an account, I do that. You're not authorized to say other people what they should do. In second, I showed that I'm available to cooperate with other users, you just reverted and undid other users edits to reinsert the information moments later and take all the credit. Guess who's the psychopath here. And again: you're not the sockpuppet, you could be the mastermind at most ;) (this is another evidence of how much you're understanding of the whole discussion). It's clear that you're not updated about the topic of the article: a wise person would accept it and cooperate along with other users, but you're a know-it-all and also arrogant person. Hence you act like this. --151.45.159.101 (talk) 12:23, 5 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Sorry, then who authorised you attack people, a wise man...? Do not contribute here if you are unaccept people reverted your edits, no need keep saying the same. --Aleen f 1 12:48, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

You called me a hypocrite...you know, you're not the only one who can offend other people. Or maybe do you live in a world of your own where this is pretty fair? I would've accepted the fact my edits had been reverted if there was a good reason explaining why and if you didn't act like you did (in which universe undoing someone else edits and reinserting the same information moments later isn't called stealing? You should be a parasite, or an arrogant person at least, if you do that). As everyone can see you were the one who was wrong. --151.45.159.101 (talk) 13:41, 5 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Oops, you not offend any people, you not arrogant, i see... who is everyone? Don't revert this people edit, otheriwse he will attack people. I'm scared, I'm scared. --Aleen f 1 13:58, 5 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Ok, little baby. Remember to grow up. --151.45.159.101 (talk) 15:39, 5 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Ya, remember that you are the best of the best that would "NOT" offend anyone, including attacking people. --Aleen f 1 22:57, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * "I want to attack people, for those who revert my edits. For those who revert my edits, you are little baby cannot grow up, you are a sockpuppeteer..." --Aleen f 1 23:01, 5 November 2020 (UTC)


 * I've never said/wrote this but it's clear that you're trying to change the subject with a bunch of lies now. In fact, either you cannot even read (I wrote that you offended me first and I acted accordingly, sort of liar) or you have some serious learning problems and you read reality in your own way, seeing threats where there's only a warning and apparently unjustified insults when you've offended other people first. Get a dose of reality. --151.45.159.101 (talk) 23:27, 5 November 2020 (UTC)


 * "I'm not offend anyone, you are a liar, falsely accuse me, I'm so innocent..., you reverts my edits, you are not growing, I want to attack you for reverts my edit" --Aleen f 1 03:12, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Getting ridicolous with every reply. For me it's OK: everyone will see what kind of person you're. For the moment I got most of what I wanted showing how incompetent you're LOL And, even better, you're still wasting your time. --151.56.211.51 (talk) 09:15, 6 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Hahaha, are you talking yourself? --Aleen f 1 14:42, 6 November 2020 (UTC)


 * --151.56.211.51 (talk) 18:08, 6 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Are you still talking yourself? --Aleen f 1 03:01, 7 November 2020 (UTC)


 * --151.53.226.61 (talk) 09:01, 7 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Oops, still...talking yourself. --Aleen f 1 10:55, 7 November 2020 (UTC)


 * --151.53.226.61 (talk) 16:50, 7 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Oops, another time talking yourself... shame --Aleen f 1 00:54, 8 November 2020 (UTC)


 * --37.161.201.134 (talk) 10:33, 8 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Oops, shame talking himself needs using diff IP. --Aleen f 1 11:34, 8 November 2020 (UTC)


 * --37.161.201.134 (talk) 12:06, 8 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Still talking himself, immature. --Aleen f 1 13:50, 8 November 2020 (UTC)


 * --37.161.201.134 (talk) 14:46, 8 November 2020 (UTC)


 * That sums up your attitude, like you commented before. --Aleen f 1 15:43, 8 November 2020 (UTC)


 * So, rules now change edit by edit LOL I've only one last doubt at this point: I wonder how you evaluated the reliability of the other unofficial sources since I saw that many edits inserting unofficial sources have been reverted (Calcioefinanza for Amazon rights in Italy last Thursday is one) while others are still there. Subjective criteria, I guess...What a man can do to get the last word is really pitiful. --151.50.247.191 (talk) 10:48, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

November 2014
I was not making any assumptions of greatness being thurst upon myself in any such matter at all and I truly do apologise for the inconvenience and misunderstanding. My knowledge on the doping case is clearly not on par. Thank you for correcting me on that subject. Your english on the other hand, ocassionally its perfect but sometimes its very poor. I am unable to comprehend how this is possible considering that you have indubitably made heaps of contributions for a wide span of time now and the vast difference. Also, I was not the first person to point out your english on the summary edit page. Nevertheless, I know I shouldn't have offended you when correcting your edit. It was very insolent of me and I do offer my sincerest apologies. --lalalandlala 3:45, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Uefa broadcasters...
Stop reverting my edits I have full reference of my edit Sony India is ban in Pakistan.ten sports broadcast uefa matches in Pakistan.... MaazRajput123 (talk) 04:50, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Vandalism against Pakistan
File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of UEFA Champions League broadcasters. User:maazrajput123 f 1 MaazRajput123 (talk) 05:05, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Vandalism against Pakistan....
After last warning...
 * – On List of UEFA Champions League broadcasters: vandalism after final warning. No reliable sources and disruptive. User:maazrajput123 f 1 MaazRajput123 (talk) 06:02, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Your vandalism already reported. Facebook is not a reliable sources, and for some reasons, didn't see your claims is legit. Ten Sports has been acquired by Sony. --Aleen f 1 06:07, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Fake vandalism against Pakistan...

 * & threats in edit summary here. Tol &#124; Talk &#124; Contribs 05:38, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * – On List of UEFA Champions League broadcasters: vandalism after final warning. No reliable sources and disruptive. User:maazrajput123 f 1 05:37, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * User keep reverting with disruptive and unreliable sources. Aleen f 1 06:03, 29 May 2021 (UTC) MaazRajput123 (talk) 06:07, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Stop
Please stop reverting my edits without any explanation. DishHome is not the only broadcaster in Nepal (UEFA).  Clog Wolf  Howl 06:29, 13 June 2021 (UTC)


 * You should the one who stop, Sony is broadcaster for Indian subcontinent, which already mentioned. --Aleen f 1 07:44, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Then couldn't you mention that in the edit summary even once before reverting me thrice? Also, your edit violated WP:ROLLBACKUSE.  Clog Wolf  Howl 07:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * You can report to admin if you think is necessary, is your failure to notice, and not me. --Aleen f 1 08:03, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * No thanks. I don't want to waste my time arguing. Adios.  Clog Wolf  Howl 08:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Copa América, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digi Sport.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

about the broadcasting rights of the olympic in Indonesian territory
no, the news was obtained from the official Champions TV instagram account, Champions TV is a Streaming Television Channel owned by IEG, IEG is the company that houses SCTV, Indosiar. and IEG is a Subsidiary of Emtek. Zakiathalla (talk) 05:58, 3 July 2021 (UTC)


 * A news which taking an update from instagram, then how reliable is that instagram? --Aleen f 1 12:17, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

!!!UPDATE!!! Emtek, the company that oversees the SCM Group media (SCTV, Indosiar, MentariTV, AjwaTV) has officially purchased the 2020 Olympics broadcast rights from Dentsu. you can see this news site, if you don't understand Indonesian or Malay it can be translated using Google Translate. https://kabarbesuki.pikiran-rakyat.com/olahraga/amp/pr-192170783/emtek-dapat-hak-siar-olimpiade-tokyo-2020-untuk-wilayah-indonesia-begini-cara-menonton-agar-tidak-diacak Zakiathalla (talk) 10:06, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Taiwan or Chinese Taipei
Taiwan is the territory that broadcast the Olympics not Chinese Taipei which is a designated name for the Olympic Committee. Can you explain about when to use Taiwan or Chinese Taipei?--Hongqilim (talk) 13:30, 6 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Since IOC is awarded to Chinese Taipei, please to be consistent. Can you list out in Olympics article the use of Taiwan? --Aleen f 1 14:12, 6 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Do note if Wikipedia want to do indifferently across Olympics or multi-sports events by using "Taiwan", i will follow. However so far nobody object the use of Chinese Taipei in broadcasting. --Aleen f 1 14:18, 6 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Very well then, I am currently replacing Taiwan with Chinese Taipei on the List of 2008 Summer Olympics broadcasters.--Hongqilim (talk) 14:59, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on List of 2022 Winter Olympics broadcasters. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TJRC (talk) 01:56, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Keep yourself laugh, i don't even see i should keep a things which factually also unable to prove it. For me i will check if edit warring warning worth it. --Aleen f 1 02:06, 23 July 2021 (UTC)


 * I am not taking a position which of you is right, or if either of you is. But you both need to stop. Take it to the talk page. TJRC (talk) 02:44, 23 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Then is your problem, i'm also not on your position of blantantly warning, i'm just make sure the fact is correct, not stop due to your warn. Won't help. --Aleen f 1 02:49, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

2020 Broadcasters
Look, I know you might prefer to watch the Olympics on Vrio. But so far there have been no announcements about any broadcasting decisions from DirecTV LA. The article you provided is not very reliable and the games are only two days yaw without any further news from DirecTV. It might be time to say they will not broadcast the games. Thank You. If you continue though, I will report you for vandalism. JR1120 12:42, 21 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Go ahead, it seems like you have illegitimate reasons for legitimate things, and do not forget, you are engaging in WP:Sockpuppet. --Aleen f 1 12:46, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Aleenf, I come with the best disposition so that we can discuss the subject and can exchange opinions in a cordial way. My reasons are as follows. As the user above says, That news from El Nacional is from 2019, before the pandemic and only mentions Venezuela, not all of South America, so if Directv had the rights (which it does not), it would only be for that country. That is the only news you will find on the entire Web that Directv has the rights, there is no statement from the IOC, it does not appear in the pdf document published by the IOC, and there is no announcement by Directv that they have acquired the rights. There is no news about the coverage they will have, nor is there advertising on their TV channels and social networks. We are talking about one of the most important sports channels in South America with a presence in 7 countries. It is as if with 2 days until the start of the event, NBC had not communicated that it had the rights or the coverage they would give it. So to close, Maybe Directv never had the rights, it had them only for Venezuela, the agreement fell as it happened with Coupang or it had them, but with the pandemic they preferred to return the rights to América Móvil, let's remember that DTV also broadcast the UEFA Euro and Copa América, and there are several channels around the world that returned different sports rights due to the issue of the pandemic. Well that was what I wanted to say and I hope this can be solved in the best way. And about the complaint, I have no relationship with the user above. Best regards.Edu1388 (talk) 15:48, 21 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Sorry, let the check decide your fate, as admin will decide whether to check you both, come clean with it. If pandemic is an issue to return the rights, is not my care, as it is hard to determine whether it is true (or not). Coupang case is somewhat emerge from news, but not from this one. As i'm told you before if a reference presented, then it should be consider it is exists, without prejudice. --Aleen f 1 15:57, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Correct, but there is a point to consider. It is a Venezuelan newspaper that only mentions Venezuela, not other countries. Just as it is impossible to determine if the pandemic is a reason to return the rights, it is also impossible to say that Directv acquired the rights for all of South America, since it never mentions it, it only says Venezuela. Read it again and you will find out. If the reference says that, then we can't interpret anything else.

That point is very important, and coincidentally VZLA is the only country in South America that does not have a broadcaster.

Textual:

'' Its goal is to strengthen and consolidate itself as a sports television leader in the country. "The Venezuelan lives from sport through our screen," he says.

''23 years of uninterrupted trajectory has Directv in Venezuela' '

"We have a commitment with our subscribers and each one of the Venezuelans"

"We serve all the needs and tastes of Venezuelans"...Edu1388 (talk) 18:07, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

I honestly do not understand why you think there are two different accounts for one person. Even though both me and Edu1388 have given you perspective on the Vrio and DirecTV dispute. They did not broadcast the opening ceremony yet you have still left it up. So far no events have been broadcasting on DirecTV in Latin America. If your response would be somewhere along the lines of "DirecTV shows the Olympics on different sporting broadcasters in Latin America," then YTTV would also have the rights since they have a dedicated page for the Olympics. This dispute will get you nowhere apart from the little time the article will be protected. JR1120 22:35, 24 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Ya, Mr. JR1120, you are right and you always right, i'm talking about references, not your perspective, your perspective won't make your desirable stand, so whatever you want to say, and maybe you are not here, just like WP:NOTHERE. --Aleen f 1 00:55, 25 July 2021 (UTC)


 * So also want to tell you how you assured that a references that few years old is somehow no longer valid? Your perspective again? We have references somehow few years old also. --Aleen f 1 01:00, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Okay, you believe what you want to believe. Here are the facts, Directv CONFIRMED on their Facebook page that they will not show the Olympic games this year. The official post reads:

"Está vez no tendremos cobertura de DIRECTV SPORTS... Por redes estamos aquí." DirecTV Facebook Page 24 Jul 2021

Which translates to we will not have Olympic coverage this time around. So if you want to keep living in a fantasy go ahead. The article is over a year old, Canal+ in France also had the rights back then with an official statement before the pandemic hut and they had to turn down the rights.

So far you have acted nothing more than a child, while I am actually in Latin America right now and DirecTV is not showing anything. Furthermore once this dispute is over, I will be verifying every post you made on this article to make sure you aren't being biased as well.

The post from facebook by the way is located on the DirecTV Sports page, and is under a comment when they did have the rights from 30 March 2020. Here is a link... https://m.facebook.com/DIRECTVSports/photos/a.271993679483383/3551555671527151/?type=3&locale2=ms_MY

JR1120 19:03, 25 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Good, that mean you ever read the guidelines of Wikipedia, that sums up. --Aleen f 1 22:54, 25 July 2021 (UTC)


 * First who cares where you from? Second, Canal+ have the news, where are your news from, a Facebook? Third, do you ever read the guidelines of Wikipedia? Fourth, are you personal attack people? And clearly you are not here, as how Wikipedia is working. --Aleen f 1 23:05, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Your recent editing history at 2024 Summer Olympics shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:48, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2011 BWF World Championships.png
Thanks for uploading File:2011 BWF World Championships.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 19 August 2021 (UTC)