User talk:Aleenf1/Archive 3

Non-free use disputed for Image:2006 WWC field hockey.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:2006 WWC field hockey.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk â¢ contribs â¢ Bot) 23:20, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:2006 IBF World.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:2006 IBF World.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk â¢ contribs â¢ Bot) 23:21, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:2006 IBF World.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:2006 IBF World.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:21, 24 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk â¢ contribs â¢ Bot) 23:21, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:2003MCC.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:2003MCC.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk â¢ contribs â¢ Bot) 23:34, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:2003MCC.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:2003MCC.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:34, 24 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk â¢ contribs â¢ Bot) 23:34, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Infobox Badminton player
Hi Aleenf1. I was just adding some infobox templates and I have seen that they are quite narrow. I think a better width could be 22 instead of 20. That should be like the Infobox NBA Player. What do you think about it? MontanNito 13:25, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

21st century
Oh, I'm sorry, I was wrong. I only had seen the template on the right of the article, but at the begining of the text it explains clearly that 21st century began in 2001. I have correct my editions. MontanNito 17:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:2006 WWC field hockey.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:2006 WWC field hockey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:38, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Promises
I've been breaking promises, but I'll try not to do it to you. What pages do you need me to look at? Xiner (talk) 20:47, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Korean names
Hi Aleenf1. I know that you told me how to write the names of the Korean players: "Korean player: Hwang Ji-man, Surname infront. Same with Taiwanese, but after the dash, it appear in small letter, not capital letter." But currently there are some users who have changed the name of some Korean players, and now they are written with capital letter afetr the dash, for example Kim Dong-Moon. That's why I wrote them with capital letter in the Japan Open article. What do I do then? Somebody says capital, somebody says no capital, that's a litle confusing. MontanNito 12:56, 1 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I will try to find who changed the names and ask him the reasons for the changes. MontanNito 15:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi! Here is the answer: User talk:MontanNito. MontanNito 17:12, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

German & advantages
Well, first of all, I have never promised anything. I know it could be better to have all the tables with flagicons (at least in the short ones), but as you have said that is too much work for you, it is also too much work for me. I think it's more important to have a lot of information of different championships without flagicons, than less information with flagicons. I have seen that you have edited the China Open. If you want, we can try to add flagicons to the main articles of every championship (especially SuperSeries and BWF champs), with the winner tables of the 21st century, and keep for the moment the articles with the full list without flagicons; some of them are really long, and perhaps is not so much aproppiated too much flagicons. You can see an example with the Scottish Open (badminton) article. What do you think about it?

And about the links, I haven't understanded you at all. I've tried to link all the names that there is an article created. If you mean you preffer to link all the players' names, I will try it; I though you preffer to link only the existing article ones, like in the European Badminton Championships.

I'm waiting for your answer and hope we can find some solution. :-) MontanNito 18:32, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Chinese Taipei Open (badminton)
I don't know why you have done this. I think I have been always ready to listen you oppion, and if you think that the article didn´t need a separate list, you could have told to me, we could have talked about this and find a solution. Anyway, I will explain you why I thoght it was better a separete article, and you decide what you want to do.

As you can read in the article, this tournament began in the 1970s, so the current list is not the full list. I separte the lists (21st century and full list), in order to have already the article created when we found the complete list of winners, and to continue with the standard format of another tournaments.

If you continue thinking that is better one single list, you can delete the template and the article. I'm in Wikipedia to improve the badminton articles, not to argue with anybody about this things. Bye. MontanNito 11:46, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

constituent countries
Do you mean something like this? --Astrokey 44 09:58, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I havent seen one of only Europe like that, there is the world one Image:BlankMap-World-Subdivisions.PNG showing England Wales & Scotland separate --Astrokey 44 12:17, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of my misspelled infobox
Hey, thanks for putting that speedy deletion notice up. I really should've just done it myself - to me, it was an inexcusable mistake creating the thing with a poorly-written title in the first place - but for some reason it never occured to me to do it. You won't get any objections to the speedy delete from me. Falastur2 13:11, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

CAF qualifiers
REF: FIFA nor CAF did not announced the list of 43 teams who qualify to the first group round, so anything still can happen There are 53 entrants, and 10 play in the preliminary round - there is no doubt (at all) about which 43 teams qualify directly to the first group round. FIFA even states it in effect ("The lowest 10 ranked countries will play ties and join the remaining entrants in the first group stage"). The list might be pointless, but it is certainly not the case and "anything still can happen". Jlsa 07:11, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Blacksticks
Fine, 2 separate pages, one "Blacksticks men", the other "Blacksticks women", with the original Blacksticks page as a disambiguation. David Underdown 10:18, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Amazingraceasialogo.jpg
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Amazingraceasialogo.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:49, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 16:49, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

South Korea hockey
Hi Aleenf1. I saw u from the hockey pages. Im just wondering, shouldnt the Korean team be the "South Korea national field hockey team"? Instead of just "Korea"? Which seems ambiguous. Because the flag is also of South Korea. kawaputra torque 09:04, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah I see. No wonder. Ok, thanks for explaining. kawaputra torque 09:23, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:The Amazing Race Asia Leg 9.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:The Amazing Race Asia Leg 9.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:24, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:The Amazing Race Asia winners.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:The Amazing Race Asia winners.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:24, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Category
I'm recategorizing, I'm not deleting categories, only adding articles in more specific categories. All the sports categories are done of this way. You can see Category:Tennis tournaments for example: Australian Open is not in Category:Grand Slam tennis tournaments, it is in its own category, Category:Australian Open. Why having the article in a category and in another more specific one? It doesn't make sense, does it? Walint 14:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Amazing Race Wiki
You're a fan of The Amazing Race, am I right? If so, you may wish to contribute to this wiki about The Amazing Race. Hope you do contribute to this wiki! :) Aranho 12:36, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

TAR Brazil
Hello! Please cite your sources when adding something that wasn't said in the original episode. For example, the episode clearly shows that teams only rode to Morro da Urca - which is halfway up the ride to the Pão-de-Açúcar, but is not part of the Pão-de-Açúcar mountain itself. Cabus 16:03, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

The cable car runs first to Morro da Urca, then proceeds to the Pão-De-Açúcar. :) In TAR2, the rapel was from the Pão-de-Açucar, which is much higher. :) Cabus 15:14, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Amazingracecentraleurope logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Amazingracecentraleurope logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:13, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Brazil map
Image:Brazilian States.PNG ? Felipe C.S ( talk ) 21:55, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BWF logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BWF logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:15, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

My edit to Amazing Race 12
All right, I cited a source along with my edit, now can you remove the message u put on my talk page? 69.181.230.137 05:27, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

The following edit to Amazing Race 12
The guy who added the next leg's location used the same source as mine. How come his edit didn't get reverted but mine did??? 69.181.230.137 05:39, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Nonsense
You seems not understand what I did. The page consists Men and Women singles champion list.Why should you seperate it Robert Siow 11:58, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Inside the article have a box contain Men and Women lists. Thats why I decided to use only one article named List of Malaysia Open champions. I am comitted to do th editing job and I hope you would understand. Robert Siow 11:20, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Adding References
Hey, do u know how to add references? If I find a better source for The Amazing Race 12 I need to know so I could add it 2 the references list. 69.181.230.137 05:44, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi
Thank you for your update of the results. I will do it for women singles. Robert Siow (talk) 09:17, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Amazing Race Asia Leg 9.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:The Amazing Race Asia Leg 9.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:39, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Amazing Race Asia winners.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:The Amazing Race Asia winners.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:39, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Amazing Race Asia Leg 9.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:The Amazing Race Asia Leg 9.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Amazing Race Asia winners.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:The Amazing Race Asia winners.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:36, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

AWB
Sorry if I seem a little pedantic for pointing this out, but I think that you should read WP:AWB before making any more edits like This one. Regards, King of the  North  East  14:51, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

European Team Championships
Hey Aleenf1! It will be similar to the 2006 European Badminton Championships. That year, between 8 and 11 April it was played the mixed team competition, followed by the singles competition between April 12 and 16. The men's and women's team competition was helded in february between 14 and 19 as a different competition.

You can see the 2008 competitions here:
 * 2008 European Men's and Women's Team Championships. Location: Almere, the Netherlands. Dates: 12 - 17 February 2008
 * 2008 European Mixed Team Championships. Location: Herning, Denmark. Dates: 12-15 April 2008
 * 2008 European Championships. Location: Herning, Denmark. Dates: 16-20 April 2008

I suppose that we should separate at least the European champs with the men's and women's team competition, but what do you think about the mixed team competition and the singles competition? They are held in the same venue, and one follows the other, but with different names... In the 2006 article there are the medalists included, but not the date. We should improve this too. What do you think? Separated or together? MontanNito (talk) 13:03, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

I think we have 3 options:
 * 1) Cover altogether, singles and both team competition in the same article. So in the introduction of the article we can explain when and where is held every tournament.
 * 2) Cover the singles and mixed team competition in the same article (they are held in the same venue, and one begins when the other finishes), and the men's and women's competition in another article (or do not cover it).
 * 3) Cover every tournament in a separated article, but as you have said "If we doesn't cover too much", it doesn't make sense to create an article

In my opinion, I'm not too interested in the team competition, so I preffer to do it all in the same article, or just one article with the singles and mixed team competition, and nothing about men's and women's team competiton. MontanNito (talk) 13:49, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Finally I have created one article for each competition:
 * 2008 European Men's and Women's Team Badminton Championships
 * 2008 European Mixed Team Badminton Championships
 * 2008 European Badminton Championships

I have aslo created the main article of both european team championships too, but in the first one, I have only found the 2006 medalists:
 * European Men's and Women's Team Badminton Championships
 * European Mixed Team Badminton Championships

MontanNito (talk) 17:05, 15 December 2007 (UTC)