User talk:Aleesha Architectuul

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you will need to start again.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 15:14, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

further explanation
As reviewing administrator, I had to delete the article draft.

Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously; and does not accept material copied from other sources unless it is in the public domain, or released to us under a free license. Please never copy  from an outside source again, and be absolutely certain that in everything you write, there is not just no copying, but no Close paraphrase. If there is, rewrite that part from scratch, changing not just the words, but the arrangement into sentences and the sequence of ideas.

In your draft for this article, you attributed  the first paragraph to the original book source used by the article in "Architechtuul". That would have been OK as a single quote in an otherwise original article, though you should have said where you saw it as well as where it was published. But the rest was copied from the National Trust for Historic Preservation page  on the house. That is a copyright source, not a source in the public domain. This information is perhaps copied from the National Register of Historic Places, which is a PD source, but I did not locate their record for this house on line. If you can find it there, or get it sent to you, then that can be used, but you must indicate exactly what parts are from there.

Your user name gives me reason to ask the question whether you intend to transcribe additional material from the Architechtuul site. Please don;t, unless you can get them to license it, which must be done exactly as specified in WP:DCM; if you by any chance represent the owner of that site, they can donate it in the same way. Please note that giving permission to use in Wikipedia is not enough; our material is CC3.0-BY-SA, and we can only use material under that license m, which gives permission for all the wrrld to reuse and modify it for any purpose, even commercial. (Or, of course, an even freer license, or public domain)  DGG ( talk ) 17:54, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Pr at yya  (Hello!) 13:55, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013
Your addition to Allgemeiner Deutscher Gewerkschaftsbund has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Mdann52 (talk) 13:56, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Breuer House II concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Breuer House II, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 12:34, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Breuer House II


Hello Aleesha Architectuul. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Breuer House II.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)