User talk:AlejandroOrmad

Your submission at AfC Ignacio Solano Cabello (August 23)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Libby norman (talk) 17:10, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Your note on my Talk page about Ignacio Solano
Hi there Alejandro, and thanks for your note. I don't think there is an issue with notability, but my original comment was about references. Different Wikipedias have different approaches, but on the Engish speaking version there's a strong emphasis on supporting material with external and neutral references that can be verified (so organisation's own website wouldn't count). Ideally references should be inline citations (you'll see these on most other pages on the English Wikipedia). There are a couple of pages which explain these guidelines and it would be a good idea to check those out. For verifiable references see WP:V, and for how to cite references see WP:CITE. Hope that helps. Libby norman (talk) 08:25, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Clarification of query on Ignacio Solano
Hi again Alejandro Sorry you don't understand what I'm getting at. Regarding your message: 'How can you verify "external and neutral references that can be verified" something that is already there? This is not a theory, is something that really exists. How can you verify something that already exists, is phisical and you can touch it? Sorry, i dont understand such and ambigue term.'

What I meant was that each statement in an article has to have a reference to support it and I would suggest you read WP:V if you haven't already done that as it explains why this guideline exists on English Wikipedia and what it means for writers and editors. In a nutshell, it means that Wikipedia is compiled based on published source material (not original research or an editor's personal knowledge). So any article on Wikipedia has to be supported by reliable evidence that comes from, for instance, a newspaper, magazine or other media source, an academic paper or book. The reason that an organisation's own website is not considered particularly trustworthy is because organisations make all kinds of claims about themselves and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or PR.

If you look at pages on pretty much any subject – for instance Patrick Blanc – you will see they have a list of References at the end. Note that the Patrick Blanc article has been picked up by an editor as lacking enough sources. An article without such issues, eg Eden Project, also contains substantial references (17 in all), even though we all know that it exists and we can go and visit it.

Therefore, even if you personally know that something happened or exists, Wikipedia articles have to have references that support the statements and claims. Ideally the reference should go at the end of the sentence (see WP:CITE), so that people can then check the original source.

I do hope that I've made this clearer, but let me know if you are still confused. You can get help from the editors at the Teahouse if you want guidance on compiling and listing references – I'm also happy to help if I can. Many thanks. Libby norman (talk) 13:23, 23 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your note Alejandro and glad to be of help. Libby norman (talk) 21:33, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Request for re-review of article on Ignacio Solano
Hi Alejandro and thanks for your further note. I don't re-review articles as I think it is better to have another editor review with a fresh eye. I have looked briefly at the article and, while you have improved it, it still looks to me rather light on good reference sources. It may help to have input from another editor on this and you could also ask advice from Wikipedia Teahouse (see note from them above). Thanks again for your note. Libby norman (talk) 12:04, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ignacio Solano Cabello (November 23)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:56, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ignacio Solano Cabello (January 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. ''' Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! '''
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [.
 * Please remember to link to the submission!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:15, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ignacio Solano Cabello (March 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. ''' Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! '''
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new Articles for creation help desk], or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ktr101&action=edit&section=new reviewer's talk page].
 * Please remember to link to the submission!

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:14, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ignacio Solano Cabello concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ignacio Solano Cabello, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ignacio Solano Cabello concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ignacio Solano Cabello, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ignacio Solano Cabello concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ignacio Solano Cabello, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ignacio Solano Cabello


Hello, AlejandroOrmad. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Ignacio Solano Cabello".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:08, 30 August 2015 (UTC)