User talk:Aleksandrkhillov

Welcome!
Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 03:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexander Hill (October 23)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alexander Hill and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Alexander_Hill Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Drmies&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Alexander_Hill reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drmies (talk) 01:57, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''You are using Wikipedia to link to your own articles and your own book, and now you are trying to publish your own biography. A few things: first of all, I will leave a templated notification for you, so you can't claim you were not notified about Conflict of Interest editing. Second, you've made some edits here, so you should know how it works: you can't post the LinkedIn version of your biography, submit it, and think it will be accepted. Third, adding your own articles, that's not a good look. Please read the COI policy and act accordingly.'' Drmies (talk) 02:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for that. I was at least being transparent - others simply pay someone to put up a biography or set up a false account - and the biography doesn't make any claims that aren't backed up by the books listed (with ISBNs). Given that most of what I might add on Wikipedia is likely to be backed up by my own work (and I was only adding my own work to pages where I thought it made a genuine contribution to further reading), then your ruling has effectively ended any chance of my contribution to the page. I think the rules have actually worked to the detriment of users. Aleksandrkhillov (talk) 15:03, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Looking at your own self-promotional activities through Wikipedia - that may follow the letter but not the spirit of the law - you should be ashamed of such hypocrisy. Aleksandrkhillov (talk) 15:18, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
 * PS - I did link the article to my university webpage - that is a secondary source. Aleksandrkhillov (talk) 15:20, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
 * ...and the ISBNs are provided for the books. Aleksandrkhillov (talk) 15:28, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Well, if I have been self-promotional, you can go ahead and prove that on WP:AN and call for my head. You'll just have to be careful of personal harassment and doxxing. I think--besides that mean streak--you don't really understand how Wikipedia works. If you were to place valid and relevant information in some article and give your own article as a reference, someone might raise an eyebrow, but the publication is peer-reviewed and thus acceptable as a source. But if you simply stick it in an article, everyone here is going to think you're promoting yourself. As for your own article, you can't "back things up" with an ISBN, since information here, especially in a biography of a living person, needs to be verified by secondary sources. If you know anything about Wikipedia, you should know that. And now you do. How is an article on you notable? If the subject is proven to be notable, either via WP:GNG or via WP:NPROF. This is the kind of thing that helps, and I am sure you kept a folder with reviews of the various monographs. But if you think of Wikipedia as a kind of LinkedIn, where ISBNs and faculty webpages suffice, I'm afraid you have the wrong idea. As for COI disclosure, that's just one of the rules we play by. Drmies (talk) 00:56, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Aleksandrkhillov, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Best practices for editors with close associations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 02:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Alexander Hill (historian)
Hello, Aleksandrkhillov. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alexander Hill (historian), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Alexander Hill (historian)


Hello, Aleksandrkhillov. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Alexander Hill".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:15, 14 July 2024 (UTC)