User talk:Alephmemtav

Welcome!

 * }

February 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Eggnog has been reverted. Your edit here to Eggnog was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://eggnogrevolution.wordpress.com/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:47, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Eggnog with this edit. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. MacAddct1984 (talk &#149; contribs) 00:52, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Eggnog with this edit. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Calabe1992 00:57, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Eggnog, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Your edit here to Eggnog was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://eggnogrevolution.wordpress.com/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:04, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming or advertising. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 01:13, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

All of this leaves me wondering why you don't just delete me altogether. It appears I have no hope of redemption. Admittedly I was not reading things carefully enough. I thought that linking my egg nog blog as a reference rather than an external link was sufficient based on what I did read, but frankly there was too much too fast. Perhaps all new contributors should be moderated instead, that way a human, not a bot, can explain their failings contextually as a dialog. As quickly as you three answered, I can't help but wonder if Closedmouth, MaxSem and Materialscientist are all real people (or if there is more bot work going on here). Unless there is some compelling reason to retain Alephmemtav, you are welcome to delete me at this time. Thanks, Scott — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alephmemtav (talk • contribs)


 * Scott, what would be the first thing you would do when unblocked, what would you change on the pages you have been editing before? --Dirk Beetstra T  C 06:10, 27 February 2012 (UTC)