User talk:Ales Munt

April 2024
Hello, I'm Cahk. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Business Aviation have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Cahk (talk) 08:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Flight time. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Cahk (talk) 08:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)


 * hi,those links that are poster like flight calculator, and flight time calculator are soft with error flight time. Aviapages flight time calculator are professional tool calculating flight time with 97 accuracy to flight planning systems. It is creating route for aircraft, use wind data, can set up country avoidance. So, why you keep links with wrong flight calculator with wrong calculation data and remove real soft that can show you real flight time on aircraft? 91.239.9.184 (talk) 08:30, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Looks like a paid advertising if you put in external links wrong soft and delete the best software on flight time calculation on the market. 91.239.9.184 (talk) 08:34, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello, I understand that you can't be knowledgeable about all topics, but calculating flight time cannot simply be based on distance and the average speed of an airplane as seen at sites like https://flighttime-calculator.com/ https://airplanemanager.com/flightcalculator.aspx calculates it much better, but lacks airplane types, historical times, detours around restricted areas, and flight route planning based on the range from those stops. These resources you mentioned calculate flight time with a very large margin of error. In the market, there is only one software that calculates flight time correctly. By omitting this source, you mislead your readers. Ales Munt (talk) 09:09, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Flight time, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings.  Annh07 (talk) 09:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello, I understand that you can't be knowledgeable about all topics, but calculating flight time cannot simply be based on distance and the average speed of an airplane as seen at sites like https://flighttime-calculator.com/ and https://airplanemanager.com/flightcalculator.aspx. The latter calculates it much better, but lacks airplane types, historical times, detours around restricted areas, and flight route planning based on the range from those stops. These resources you mentioned calculate flight time with a very large margin of error. In the market, there is only one software that calculates flight time correctly. By omitting this source, you mislead your readers. Ales Munt (talk) 09:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Or tell me why you are confusing people with wrong data and deleting really good sources Ales Munt (talk) 09:11, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi Ales Munt. A source that needs our guidelines as given in WP:RS. These commercial sites are spam, not reliable sources. Please read WP:LINKSPAM, WP:ELNO. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 09:18, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I still don't understand why you can't add the correct link to the flight time calculator. Why are readers given links to faulty software? I don't need links from Wikipedia. You use many photos from our resource, and many links lead to us from your site. I'm confused as to why you mislead people by giving them the wrong software for calculating time. As an expert in this field, I'm outraged that a source I always considered the most reliable for information has such errors. It gives the impression that this is all paid for, and I no longer want to trust such a resource. We will create an expert post about how Wikipedia misleads its readers. Ales Munt (talk) 09:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * You are adding a link to a commercial website to articles, which is considered advertising and spamming.
 * If you have any questions, please post a question at Tea house. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 09:43, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * https://airplanemanager.com/ is commercial website too, they are our competitors, so delete their link too! It looks like paid post Ales Munt (talk) 09:48, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I have removed all inappropriate links from the article (not just airplanemanager). Annh07 (talk) 09:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Very good, now i see it's a resource you can trust! Thank you, have a nice day Ales Munt (talk) 10:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)