User talk:Aleskr

Michael
I have already put the new discussion section. I believe there should be discussion first before just seemed like arbitrarily removing everything Someone edited, I put it back explaining why with factual info each time but no one really discussed. All I got were value judgments/opinions (not the wikipedia info) like that below, which seems more like "warring" mentality to me. My last edit was to correct a url, in case that made a difference. Aleskr (talk) 20:28, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

This is NOT the Seattle Times, this is Wikipedia if you forgot it. Twitter is not and won't be a reliable source. Tb hotch Ta lk C. 19:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Michael (album). Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tb hotch Ta lk C. 20:03, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * And before you want your account blocked for edit warring, read WP:RS. Furthermore we do NOT need copyright violations for plagarize their twitter comments. Tb hotch Ta lk C. 20:06, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." And like I said, it the cases I used, it was just like quoting from the official website of the artist of which I have never seen any "copyright violations" Aleskr (talk) 20:28, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Non-free content #3a. MINIMAL USE Tb hotch Ta lk C.+

Like I said, I think it is similar to quoting from an artist's official website. I think that there are different ways to look at this.
 * Also see WP:UNDUE (give 11kb of what Randy said is a NPOV violation). And stop moving this to many talkpages, involving users than haven't be involved. Tb hotch Ta lk C. 21:20, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

I was welcome to reducing the number of quotes. I contacted Courcelle who said I could ask for help, the etiquette page to deal with the etiquette issue, and started a discussion section as advised by another user as there was a need for discussion on the Twitter issue. These are all good and reasonable sources of feedback.Aleskr (talk) 00:19, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:41, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hillel of Greater Toronto


The article Hillel of Greater Toronto has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable campus organization, see Northeastern University Hillel"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 21:38, 18 November 2017 (UTC)