User talk:Alex.mazer

Replaceable fair use File:WorthingtonIndustriesCylinders.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:WorthingtonIndustriesCylinders.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:03, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing Wikipedia for company promotion. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:09, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Many of your edits do seem to be just perfectly acceptable updates, but with the best will in the world an edit which introduces a whole string of text along the lines of "For 60 years, Worthington Industries has been North America's premier, value-added steel processor, providing customers with a wide range of capabilities, products and services..." is an attempt to use Wikipedia for promotion. If you wish to be unblocked, I suggest you make it clear that you understand that such editing is not appropriate, and that you will keep well clear of such promotional editing in the future. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:56, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

I see what you are saying. I will be careful of the wording in the future. "Alex.Mazer" 14:30 14 April 2015(EST)

Bearing in mind wikipedia conflict of interest policy, do you intend to continue to edit about your company?--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 19:13, 14 April 2015 (UTC)


 * You should also take a look at the Terms of Use regarding paid editing. Huon (talk) 00:34, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

My intentions are to ensure the information already included on this page remains up to date. I will refrain from promotional speak. It was an innocent mistake and my first infraction of this type. My intentions were not to use that type of language. I just want to ensure users receive the most accurate information about the company. Thank you. "Alex.Mazer" 08:30 15 April 2015(EST)

At the risk of asking a dumb question, could someone explain to me how I approach a standard offer? I looked at the linked page, but I am still a little unclear. Is there someone I could send corrected information to in the meantime because the page has reverted and is very out of date now. Surely that would ensure there is no promotional language? Just trying to get an understanding of how this works. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you, Alexandra "Alex.Mazer" 16:00 22 April 2015(EST)

Block Review Request
You were kind enough to try to explain to me what I had done to become blocked on Wikipedia so I am reaching out to you again for consideration on removing the block.

I understand what I did to earn the block and I think I should be reinstated because I would like a second chance to use Wikipedia within the guidelines. Over the last six months, I have had a lot of time to read up on why the block was put in place and how to go about making edits that are constructive. I am concerned that with my block, the Worthington Industries page is now very out of date. I also don't believe I received a warning prior to the block about my text edits, or if I had I don't believe it was clear. I also think and indefinite block is a little harsh for a first time offense.

I promise to stop using phrases that can be viewed as promotional for Worthington Industries. I have also included a statement on my Talk page that discloses I am editing on behalf of the company. I am here only to provide current information and images about the company. Thank you for your time and consideration.