User talk:Alex12341000

Frequencies
Please do not add frequencies to bus route articles, see WP:NOT. Wikipedia is not a travel guide. Jenuk1985 |  Talk  21:27, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. FaerieInGrey (talk) 23:18, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Jenuk1985 |  Talk  23:41, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of North Weald Flyer
I have nominated North Weald Flyer, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/North Weald Flyer. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jenuk1985 |  Talk  16:22, 22 February 2009 (UTC)e:AFDWarning -->  Jenuk1985  |  Talk  16:19, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Jenuk1985 |  Talk  23:04, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are unusual or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Jenuk1985 |  Talk  11:01, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive or hard to read formatting, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jenuk1985 |  Talk  11:03, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Jenuk1985 |  Talk  11:15, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Logos
Hi! Can you please not add bus operator logos to articles about their bus routes. They don't actually add much at all (nothing in my opinion), and in most cases where you have added them, the file does not have a fair use rationale (See WP:FAIR USE.) Thank you. Arriva436talk/contribs 17:26, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Keys
Please do not add keys to articles where they have no use. Jenuk1985 |  Talk  15:22, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * - I was merely trying to give the List of bus routes in Essex page a format similar to List of bus routes in London to try and comply to Wiki rules. The key would eventually make the 'frequency' (already deleted) column unneccesary as adding frequency is against Wiki rules. This must mean the List of bus routes in London is against Wiki rules so maybe you should edit that page aswell. User:Alex12341000
 * Using colour in this way is prohibited in the MoS, yes the London list needs editing. Jenuk1985  |  Talk  15:30, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Please do not add non-encyclopaedic information as you did to List of bus routes in Essex. Your edits have been reverted. Jeni ( talk ) 02:34, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Fair use images can only be used on pages when there is a valid fair use rationale for them. Your edit to Essex bus route 59 has been reverted. Jeni ( talk ) 17:46, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Please stop adding fair use images to pages without a valid fair use rationale. Your edits have been reverted and if they continue will be considered to be vandalism. Jeni ( talk ) 18:25, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. Next time you use fair use images inappropriately you run the risk of being blocked from editing. Jeni ( talk ) 16:54, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Behaviour on buses ...
Hi, while behaviour on buses may be useful to some readers; it is not appropriate for wikipedia. Information added to wikipedia needs to be verifiable in reliable sources - such as national newspaper articles, published books, or academic research. Your own observations are sadly original research and so, not permissible. HTH Kbthompson (talk) 15:57, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Essex bus routes 542 and 543
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Essex bus routes 542 and 543. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Essex bus routes 542 and 543. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Essex bus route 555


The article Essex bus route 555 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non notable bus route

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nuttah (talk) 07:54, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Essex bus route 59


The article Essex bus route 59 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non notable bus route

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nuttah (talk) 10:20, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Essex bus route 59
I have nominated Essex bus route 59, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Essex bus route 59. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Nuttah (talk) 10:25, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Let's Go to the Hop. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 20:32, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Social structure of the United Kingdom, you may be blocked from editing. Utterly inappropriate. Rodhull  andemu  22:42, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

July 2011
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of bus routes in Essex. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 20:24, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Essex bus route 213
Template:Essex bus route 213 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:23, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Essex school bus routes


The article List of Essex school bus routes has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Has no notability. These routes are not even public transport as the general public cannot use them. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTTRAVEL at the least.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Charles (talk) 08:47, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Hertfordshire school bus routes


The article List of Hertfordshire school bus routes has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Has no notability. These routes are not even public transport as the general public cannot use them. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTTRAVEL at the least.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Charles (talk) 08:53, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Courtesy message from WikiProject Transport
Hi there Alex12341000. You are registered with WikiProject Buses and we are cleaning out our list of members. As you have not contributed to any page for over a year we have removed you as inactive. If you still want to participate in the project, just go back and add yourself again. Thank you.  Rcsprinter  (gas)  @ 18:57, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hertfordshire bus route C3
Template:Hertfordshire bus route C3 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Peter&#160;James (talk) 15:22, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of TWH Bus & Coach for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TWH Bus & Coach is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/TWH Bus & Coach until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nightfury 13:44, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Town Link


The article Town Link has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NCORP. Could not find any significant coverage after searching under the various names the business has used."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SK2242 (talk) 23:56, 11 March 2021 (UTC)