User talk:Alex1977-1

January 2016
Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Myles Munroe has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 19:33, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Sunday Adelaja. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. JesseRafe (talk) 19:50, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nas, you may be blocked from editing. JesseRafe (talk) 19:50, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Frederick Achom, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 15:08, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Frederick Achom. Krj373*(talk), *(contrib) 17:18, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Talkback
Shearonink (talk) 17:28, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
Your recent editing history at Frederick Achom shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Shearonink (talk) 19:32, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Frederick Achom. —  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   05:59, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. only (talk) 05:00, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. m.o.p 17:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 00:29, 2 March 2016 (UTC)