User talk:Alex981202

Sources and error
Hi Alex981202! I see your point re: Roman metallurgy, but pointing out errors on our own initiative isn't allowed, per WP:synth and WP:OR; thus, we can't preface cited information with editorial provisos such as "however" blah blah. What we can do is outline the basis of calculation used by those sources, and let the reader decide; or (ideally) offer a cited critique of those figures. We cannot draw inferences, or invite the reader to do so. Haploidavey (talk) 12:00, 27 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Regarding the pitfalls of estimation and statistics, it might be well worth your while to read through the talk-page archives - not the current page but the previous, where such matters have been discussed in detail. In particular, note Peterkingiron's comments. Haploidavey (talk) 12:45, 27 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the revert, Alex, and thanks for the message. Haploidavey (talk) 22:31, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Alex981202, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Roman metallurgy. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Haploidavey (talk) 12:05, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Plesase note in particular the link to citing sources and adding references; one of the sources you added gives no author or publisher - "Iron production in Roman Britain" can't therefore be verified. Cheers

Hello again
Hi Alex; describing a section as "stupid" (re your edit summary at Roman metallurgy) doesn't explain or justify its removal. We've had some useful and (I hope) productive exchanges in the past. Perhaps you could explain why you removed the section, rather than offering alternative sources and content? Haploidavey (talk) 21:49, 11 June 2017 (UTC)