User talk:Alex:D

Image tagging for Image:TPhoenixBand.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:TPhoenixBand.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 20:12, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:MirceatheElder.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MirceatheElder.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:12, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

dobmap
some historians think "jurcova" refers to Giurgiu. if it was already part of moldavia, why did Stephen had to take it from wallachia? my sources say mircea's possessions extended to the hills north of the river.Anonimu 06:42, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Dobrotitsa
Greetings! I just wanted to tell you that despite his ethnic origin, Dobrotitsa was part of the Bulgarian nobility. There is an argument whether he is a Bulgarian or Cuman or Vlach or whatever, but in all cases he is a Bulgarian noble; follow the discussion. I will remove the tag citation needed from there. Take an example of Asen and Petar: they are very likely to had been of Cuman origin, but they are not Cuman nobles or Cuman Emperors, they are Bulgarian ones, so you know what I mean. Regards, --Gligan 09:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The Bulgarian Emperors titled themselves "Emperor of the Bulgarians and Romans", does it mean that the the country is Bulgarian-Roman Empire?! All titles of the sort emperor, king, prince of Bulgarians (for instance) and vlachs, greeks, serbs, chinese aim to glorify the ruler. From 1202 the Hungarian king took the title King of the Bulgarians, but that does not mean that he is a Bulgarian.


 * It is obvious that Ivan Asen II, Petar IV and Kaloyan have restored the the Bulgarian Empire, not created a new Bulgarian-Vlach state. --Gligan 17:20, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

So I will find sources and add the Bulgarian names of Vladislav I of Wallahia, Dan I of Walachia because they were de jure vassals of the Bulgarian Emperor => related to Bulgarian history. --Gligan 19:07, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:TRMircea.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:TRMircea.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

About the ethnic character of the Second Bulgarian Empire
Dear Romanian passionate patriot, not every Vlach is Romanian. For example in contemporary Bulgaria there are 10,566 Vlachs and only 1,088 Romanians - as separate ethnic groups. These two groups freely declare their different nationality during the last census in 2001, check here. Romanian nation is modern construct, based on only one part of the Balkan Vlachs. There were Vlach communities, which didn't participate in the modern Romanian nation building. So, it is a nationalistic speculation to insist on Romanian identity of one medieval ruler on the basis of theories with disputed validity. Sorry, but Romanian insufficiency of state history could not be healed with hyperinterpretations like these about the Second Vlach/Bulgarian Empire. Try to understand - all native documents show only Bulgarian identity. The native sources have priority in every relevant history. Still more, the meaning and the adequacy of the term "Vlach" in this particular case, used in the smaller part of the historical sources from this time for period of only two decades (1186-2007), are rejected by significant stream among the academic tradition. Check one important result of this scientific situation - Encyclopedia Britannica, in which Asen I, Kaloyan and Ivan Asen II are treated as Bulgarian Tsars only. Kaloyan's state wasn't Romanian, it wasn't dominated by the Wallachian idea, territory or population too. Moesia, Thrace, Macedonia and large parts of what is now Eastern Serbia against undefined part of Wallachia? This state was dominated by the Bulgarian name, concept, tradition, official language, lands and inhabitants. And, finally, if Kaloyan had Vlach origin, which isn't very likely, he has to be treated as Bulgarian of Vlach origin, but not as ethnic Vlach. Best wishes, Jackanapes 22:08, 2 July 2007 (UTC) P. s. About your accusation in censorship. Dear, I don't want to erase any relevant sourced historical or scientific information. I have erased only your attempts to include the name of Kaloyan in Romanian language, which is irrelevant because this is English language Wikipedia and we are talking about one article for Bulgarian medieval Tsar. When the Second Bulgarian Empire will emerge as the earliest medieval Romanian state in Wikipedia, I will agree with such addition. Ok? - Jackanapes 22:45, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

It is really funny. You have provided source for modern Romanian language pronunciation and spelling of the Kaloyan's name because there isn't any medieval Vlach language document containing his name. Quite irrational situation. Moreover, the preserved Wallachian documents, which emerged long time after Kaloyan's death, used predominantly Medieval Slavic (or Old Bulgarian) language for centuries... - Jackanapes 23:19, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Hehehe, you have confessed your sin! You have offered the name from the modern Romanian historiography and nothing more. This name is very popular among Bulgarians too, it was documented among the ordinary people in XVII century and even had several female variants, but its usage in folklore can't be connected only directly with the real historical figure of Tsar Kaloyan and explained only with him, I suppose. It would be speculation. I really don't understand why are you so stubborn with this name? Here in Wikipedia there isn't practice to offer pronunciation and spelling in non-English foreign languages when there isn't relevant basis. Look, I don't feel anything negative against the Romanians, on the contrary, but this partucular artificial "Romanization" is anachronistic and seems as nationalistic claim... Please, try to reconsider your position, my friend! - Jackanapes 23:44, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

What kind of tradition had given this form of the name? When exactly this name was documented/written in Vlach/Romanian language? If this isn't medieval tradition, it could not be relevant source in connection with the Tsar Kaloyan. Try to reconsider your thinking. - Jackanapes 00:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

P. s. If these folklore examples were recorded and published recently during (or even after) the Enlightenment era (as it is with almost all Balkan folklore collections), we could suppose that these folklore materials have medieval origin, but nevertheless they are documented much later and as principle show the latest phase of their development, so they could not be accepted as primary sources in researches of the proper medieval culture. Example for similar scientific situation. There are Bulgarian epic songs about "tsar Yasen (Asen)", but they aren't quoted in any Wikipedia article, connected with Asens, because they were documented in 19 and 20 centuries. The Historians don't treat these songs as primary sources for the epoch of the Asens, 12-15 centuries (even in etymological aspect!). I hope you will accept this.- Jackanapes 00:57, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

You insist to include in the article about medieval tsar Kaloyan form of the name, beared by this ruler, from oral tradition, recorded in 18-20 centuries, but Kaloyan died in 13 century! This is anachronism. Moreover, these folklore materials most probably contain that name but haven't direct connection with the historical figure of tsar Kaloyan, therefore they are irrelevant. Enough nationalistic speculations! - Jackanapes 10:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:PhoenixBabaNovak.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:PhoenixBabaNovak.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ElinorD (talk) 20:14, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Phe1.jpg
I have tagged Image:Phe1.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. ElinorD (talk) 20:15, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Phoenix1974.jpg
I have tagged Image:Phoenix1974.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. ElinorD (talk) 20:16, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:That's All Right.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:That's All Right.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:48, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

If you need help with the fair use, let me know. We should know the copyright holder; the source of the image; specific reasons for its use; that it is low-resolution etc. There is a template that can be used. I'll help you out here if you feel the image should stay. If not, then I'll support that. Regards, --Northmeister 13:42, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Merge proposal for List of Ottoman Empire dominated territories
If you're interested, please comment here. —  AjaxSmack   05:43, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TPhoenixBand.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:TPhoenixBand.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:38, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TPhoenixBand.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:TPhoenixBand.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:25, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Tampa2.jpg
Hi. BetacommandBot has bothered me about this image many times, complaining about the tagging. Is there any chance you could maybe find a suitable one, or release the picture into the public domain? Thank you for your consideration. Biruitorul (talk) 06:37, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Biruitorul 13:12, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Yo
You can check out the guidelines on WP:RS.

"Organizations and individuals that are widely acknowledged as extremist, whether of a political, religious or anti-religious, racist, or other nature, should be used only as sources about themselves and their activities in articles about themselves, and even then with caution."

Hope this helps. And yes, "Altermedia: White news for White people" counts. :) - Francis Tyers · 22:43, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Coats of arms
Asa o fi! Dar svg-urile in cauza sunt mult mai urate. Daca ar fi de calitate superioara, nu le-as tot schimba! ES Vic (talk) 20:47, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Good stuff
Thanks for helping out with List of crossings of the Danube River! I really appreciate it becuase I have never been to Romania and your expertise is probably very valuable! --DerRichter (talk) 23:46, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Nicholas Medforth-Mills
Hi Biruitorul :) I was referred to you by User:Lil' mouse 3. I'm interested in perhaps obtaining a translation of the two articles from Cotidianul on Nicholas Medforth-Mills' page, Prince Nicholas: “I am ready to be the King of Romania and Prince Nicholas, a dream of romanticism among the Romanian youth. I was hoping you could help in translating them for me, or else point me to where I could obtain a decent translation. Thanks in advance! Morhange (talk) 07:33, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Re:Would you be interested in...
Yes, I'm interested. Please give me more details about it. --Olahus (talk) 07:54, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * You can find it in my Romanian user page. --Olahus (talk) 14:48, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Romanian Royal standard
Unfortunately it is not like that. I will scan all the flags of Romania that are presented in that dictionary, but I can't do that very soon. As a verbal description, the cross of "Mihai Viteazul" Order is big, on the whole area of the flag, and the eagle is smaller, in the center of the cross. As I said, I will scan the flags as soon as I can take the dictionary to a scanner. The worst case scenario is a photo. ES Vic (talk) 06:04, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Romanian Royal standard


Until I get my hands on the dictionary (which I hope is from 1923 and not 1932), I found some interesting pictures in my "personal archive" (so to speak). The first two are taken in the National Military Museum "Ferdinand I", and represent the flags of the King and of the Crown Prince. They are almost of no value for our quest, except to confirm (if necesary) that we nu umblăm după cai verzi pe pereţi. Still, you can notice that the blue of the Crown Prince's flag is darker than the one you used. The last two where taken during the reburrial ceremony of Carol II. As the flag of the King covers the caughin, it is larger than the first one (used to hoist on buildings and/or on ships). I don't comment on the color shades (althow essentialy different from the first picture), nor the quality of the drawing (we had earlier a dispute on this matter: tha trawing is correct, not necesary beautifull). I will point to you the presence of the collar (sash) of the order of "Carol I". Now I can only point out that on the first picture (of the flag that was in actual use!), and in numerous other references, the King's standard does not have the sash (collar) of the Order of "Carol I". Also I doubt that the Army's Historical Service (Serviciul Istoric al Armatei) could made such a mistake. I think we arrived in a dead point.

About the model that you proposed (based on the dictionary description) I wave the following comment: allthough I don't argue the description, I doubt that the difference between the King's Standard and the Queen's Standard was so little, and so difficult to spot! I think that we both know that, in Romania, the Queen was nothing more than the consort of the chief of the state (the King). So I assume that the eagle was equal in size with the cross of the order, and so placed in the middle of the standard; allthough this does not fit the description...

ES Vic (talk) 17:41, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

PS: please forgive the spelling. Feel free to continue in Romanian, if you don't mind!


 * Din pacate nu sunt din Bucuresti, si nici n-am drum in zona prea curand. Mi-au scapat lipsurile colanului Ordinului Carol I, si acuma ma gandesc asa: steagul ala a stat pe sicriul lui Carol II din 1953 (nu mai stiu de unde am auzit asta, dar e plauzibil). Prin urmare se prea poate sa fie un steag facut in Portugalia, "din auzite" sau dupa desene mai vechi, poate chiar de-ale Regelui, cu schimbari imaginate de el, stiuta fiind pasiunuea lui pentru steaguri, uniforme militare, decoratii samd. Propun sa... ignoram pozele astea (care deja au disparut de pe wikipedia), care ar reprezenta un model (2003 sau poate 1953) pentru simplul motiv ca nu e corect colanul (una e sa nu pui stemele pe lant, si alta e sa uiti capul vulturului cu totul); e chiar grosolan, dupa mine. In cazul in care nu este niciun bucurestean care sa pozeze steagul la Palatul Elisabeta, cred ca o sa ajung in iulie sau august in Bucuresti, si o sa vad daca am ce poza atunci. --ES Vic (talk) 17:06, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Steagurile Regatului - 1926.jpg|700px]]
 * Am ajuns la dictionar. astea-s toate steagurile referitoate la România. Dictionarul nu este din 1923, cum am crezut initial, ci, dupa cum scrie pe ultima pagina: tiparit intre februarie 1926 si noembrie 1931. Este vorba de Dicţionarul Enciclopedic Ilustrat Cartea Românească, autori I.-A. Candrea - Gh. Adamescu, aparut la editura Cartea Românească. Sper sa fie de folos! --ES Vic (talk) 08:30, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Map
Greeting! Oltenia or Severin Banat was Bulgarian until 1263 - there was a war between Bulgaria and Hungary in which the Hungarians took it from Bulgaria. Would you return the borders as they were? --Gligan (talk) 22:22, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Hmmm here is a description of the war: "In the north-western border the Magyars continued with their invasions - in 1259 the Magyar heir to the throne Stefan advanced deep into Bulgarian territory. In the same year Konstantine Asen counter-attacked and his conquered Severing Banat. The Magyar King tried in futile to assemble his baron to fight back the Bulgarians. The status was restored by magister Laurentius; the winner hanged the captured Bulgarians along the Danube and advanced to the east..."


 * The borders of my map are from Atlas of History for 8th grade, approved by MoE (Ministry of education) with letter No. 6724/09.05.2000 and confirmed with letter No. 13528 from 19.04.2001. So I think it would be better to restore that border and add that Atlas as a source - I haven't drew that map from my imagination... --Gligan (talk) 12:09, 20 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Probably you are right :-) But still, that is an officially accepted map - the specialists in our ministry can't be unaware of the facts you stated. I would suggest to colour that territory with green and blue lines and write below (if you find place) lost to Hungary in 1261. Unfortunately I don't know how to use Photoshop very well and to make such lines so I would ask you to do the job. Best, --Gligan (talk) 13:46, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Drapelul Jandarmeriei
Presupun ca tu ai facut Drapelele de lupta ale Armatei (FT, FA, FN si SM). Ma gandesc sa-ti propun sa faci (daca ai vreme) si drapelul de lupta al Jandarmeriei. E pe acelari principiu ca al Armatei, doar ca in colturi e simbolul Jandarmeriei (de pe stema; J-ul in romb) peste cele doua sabii incrucisate. L-as face chiar eu, dar la editarea imeginilor sunt cam rudimentar (adica in paint). Daca ai nevoie de bibliografie, aici, aici, aici si poate si aici (daca mai apar numere ale revistei) gasesti imagini cu drapelul. Numai bine! --ES Vic (talk) 15:18, 22 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Am mai gasit in arhiva personala 2 poze... nu-s foarte clare, ca-s de pe site-ul Jandarmeriei. Eu am vazut steagurile astea la defilarile de 1 Decembrie. S-ar putea sa mai fie steazguri de lupta ale Pompierilor Militari (sigla/emblema de pe stema IGSU); Ma indoiesc de cele ale Politiei, pentru ca Politia nu e structurea militarizata. Urmeaza pozele Image:IMAGE1%2099.jpg si Image:Image_DEFILARE 01.12.2005.jpg. --ES Vic (talk) 07:40, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Just a quick thank you for your contributions to Speed limits by country. :-) — M ETS 501 (talk) 16:47, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

My pleasure
Great work on your part, evidently. Who knows, maybe here too it will make FA. Biruitorul Talk 13:57, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Testcard B.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Testcard B.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Peer review
This is exciting! I too hope for the best. I think here on en.wiki they will insist on actual citations from all the relevant laws (you know, the Communist flags section), but we shall see. -- Biruitorul Talk 22:35, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Regret că a scris aşa, fiindcă mie mi se pare OK cu lungimea şi imaginile actuale, dar are dreptate că trebuie micşorat în câteva articole mai uşor de digerat. Ideal ar fi să realizăm această măsura fără însă a pierde conţinut, fiindcă cred că mai tot ce cuprinde articolul actual este de valoare. -- Biruitorul Talk 02:35, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Foarte bine. Aştept să văd cum împarţi tu articolele, şi dacă mai e nevoie de ceva curăţenie, apar eu pe scenă. -- Biruitorul Talk 02:50, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Pai îmi place. Şi restul îl transferăm în alt articol (sau articole). Singura sugestie ar fi să mai eliminăm poate din lista decreturilor, fiindcă vor apărea în celălalt articol drapelurile la care se referă. -- Biruitorul Talk 19:22, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Da, e o idee bună, mai ales fiindcă astfel de contravenţii se întâmplă şi astăzi:, . -- Biruitorul Talk 21:27, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Felicitări! Am doar o mică sugestie la History of the flags of Romania: trebuie un fel de introducere (măcar trei-patru rânduri). Nu se obişnuieşte ca cuprinsul să aibă text deasupra lui, decât dintr-o secţie introductivă. Să ne gândim la ce să coninţă această secţie. - Biruitorul Talk 15:41, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:Moldovan topics
Ati creat un sablon foarte bun. L-am editat un pic, dupa care am observat ca de fapt exista doua sabloane:. Ar trebui unite intrunul. De exemplu, am putea sa luam Template:Moldova topics ca baza si sa adaugam toata informatia din sablonul creat de D-ra. Daca stiti cum, ati putea va rog sa faceti si sa aranjati subsectiuni in T:Moldova t, asa cum ati facut in T:Moldovan t. Eu pot ajuta la organizarea continututui, dar sunt o persoana care nu are simtul graficii in sange, asa ca as prefera ca chestiile stilistice (inclusiv alegerea culorilor, fonturilor, imaginilor) sa le faca cineva cu mai multa tragere de inima. Dc76\talk 17:12, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Traducere
Dacă e vorba de o arhivă întreagă, "archival database"; dacă doar de o entitate dintr-o arhivă, "archival document". În fine, aşa mi se pare mie, dar dacă ai mai mult context, sa mi-l dai. Poţi să şi ceri o a două opinie de la AdiJapan. - Biruitorul Talk 04:55, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Iuga of Moldavia
Hi, the article was totally confused. I deleted all parts that could not be easily verified. I used a Google translation of the article that you found... which is of very poor quality. Can you please translate some more details about the guy? Thanks, Renata (talk) 04:32, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I meant more along the lines "translate relevant bits and add it to the article", but... wow... thank you! I will definitely use it. Renata (talk) 02:47, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Atacul de noapt1 film 2.png
Thank you for uploading Image:Atacul de noapt1 film 2.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Black Falcon (Talk) 07:15, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Beautified Romanian Coat of Arms
I saw a lot of coat of arms, especially historic and old ones that were beautified by adding a transparency effect. I tried this on the Romanian Coat of Arms and because I didn't want to alter the current Coat of Arms file I created a new file based on it. Do you think that we should alter the original Coat of Arms by adding the transparency effect?

Thanks! Scooter20 (talk) 09:04, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

wallachia map
problema ca in fiecare carte/articol de istorie te uiti, gasesti o alta interpretare a documentelor. granita de nord-est e cea mai problematica, asa ca am lasat-o difuza pt a indica celui care o priveste ca nu se cunoaste traseul ei concret. Panaitescu este un istoric important, dar nu este singura eminenta in domeniu. In cateva carti pe care le am se vorbeste de un hrisov din 1387 care ar fi vorbit de partile tataresti. exceptand granita de NE, care ar fi problemele concrete cu harta curenta(Amlas, Fagaras, Severin - in cazul ultimului granita de est este cea valaha de dupa sec XVI, dar am vazut anumiti istorici, in special straini, care o plaseaza mai spre est, chiar pe Jiu)? Idea principala e ca sursele sunt cam confuze, si vreau sa am ceva mult mai concret inainte sa o modific din nou... nu e mare chestie, dar s-ar putea ca maine sa apara o noua carte despre Mircea scrisa de catre un istoric reputat, si sa avem alta interpretare. in zilele urmatoare nu o sa am foarte mult timp, asa ca, daca te grabesti, poti sa adaugi tu acele orase pe harta in varianta svg (exista o legatura in josul paginii din domeniul fisier) si eventual sa o convertesti in png. Anonimu (talk) 17:45, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Am modificat harta pentru a adauga orasele. Inca nu am marcat feuda Branului pt ca nu am date exacte pentru limite. Voi studia articolul din lb. romana ca parca scrisesei ceva despre asta acolo. Am modificat doar png-ul, pentru ca imi este mai usor. Voi face si svg-ul in curand. Ciudat ca nu ti-a mers sa salvezi cu transparenta. Eu l-am salvat folosind un nightly build de inkscape (din pacate era pe desktop si l-am sters la curatenia periodica).Anonimu (talk) 20:48, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:MargaretDumont.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:MargaretDumont.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:08, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Banatul de Severin
Nici harta nu e f.f. precisa, deoarece Turnu-Severin a apartinut de fapt Ungariei in Evul mediu. In fine, e adevarat de Banatul de Severin cuprindea estul a ceea ce numim noi azi "Banat" si vestul a ceea ce numim azi "Oltenia", insa nu sunt nici azi cunoscute cu precizie limitele sale. Utilizatorul Nelu Craciun din ro:wiki poate sa te ajute mai mult in aceasta privinta deoarece, bananean fiind, se pricepe mai bine si are mai mult interes in acest domeniu. Eu nu sunt nici banatean, nici oltean. Care este aricolul (sau harta) in privinta caruia (careia) ai o disputa cu bulgarii? --Olahus (talk) 20:09, 5 September 2009 (UTC) Am gasit aici niste harti bulgaresti. Pe unele dintre ele poate ca le cunosti. --Olahus (talk) 14:01, 10 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Dar de harta aceasta ce mai zici? --Olahus (talk) 07:50, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:MiraTVR.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:MiraTVR.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:21, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Enciclopedia României
You may be interested in the last paragraph of this comment. - Biruitorul Talk 16:29, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:PhoenixBabaNovak.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:PhoenixBabaNovak.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 17:08, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:PhoenixBabaNovak.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:PhoenixBabaNovak.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 23:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MiraTVR.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:MiraTVR.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:05, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Re:Enhancing old maps
Este perfect ok. --Olahus (talk) 22:00, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Vreau sa-ti multumesc inca odata pentru ajutorul pe care mi-l acorzi, pentru faptul ca imbunatatesti vizibilitatea imaginilor. Iti permit pe termen nelimitat sa modifici orice imagine incarcata de mine dupa cum consideri ca este bine (indiferent de licenta imaginii). Sper ca astfel sa inceteze orice disputa pe care o ai din cand in cand cu unii utilizatori in Wikimedia Commons. O zi buna! --Olahus (talk) 12:00, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MargaretDumont.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:MargaretDumont.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 13:34, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Harta
Nu stiu, dar voi cauta. Ce scara are harta? --Olahus (talk) 11:17, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Romania
--Codrin.B (talk) 19:18, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Eurovision final points 1969.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Eurovision final points 1969.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Template talk:Country data Romania
Template talk:Country data Romania, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template talk:Country data Romania and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Template talk:Country data Romania during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Loginnigol (talk) 13:02, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MiraTVR.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:MiraTVR.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:20, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Eurovision final points 1969.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Eurovision final points 1969.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:That&#39;s All Right.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:That&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:55, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sam Frenchie Marx.png
Thanks for uploading File:Sam Frenchie Marx.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:14, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Your recent article moved to draft space
Hi, I moved your recent article to draft space by giving a valid edit summary. Please check and improve if you're interested. Please let me know if you have any questions and I'll be happy to answer them. Happy editing! :-) Maliner (talk) 09:15, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi, I have added references to all of them. Alex:D (talk) 09:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Ținutul Crișuri. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. signed,Rosguill talk 14:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC)