User talk:AlexADP

November 2017
Hey! I happened to see the complete rewriting you did to Cerebellar theory of dyslexia and wanted to let you know it was fantastic! I did notice you had some trouble with references though. You copy pasted references in such a way that caused multiple cites of the same source to appear in the reference list. This makes the article size (in bytes) to be a lot bigger and makes the reference section messy, and no one wants that! I'd advise you to use the sandbox to try and mess with citations and to read Citing sources, I know it's very long but you're an amazing editor and with this little bit of extra learning you could help Wikipedia so much more!

Thanks for hearing me out! Hecseur (talk) 19:53, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cerebellar theory of dyslexia
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cerebellar theory of dyslexia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 17:41, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cerebellar theory of dyslexia
The article Cerebellar theory of dyslexia you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Cerebellar theory of dyslexia for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 18:21, 21 April 2018 (UTC)