User talk:AlexCWebb

December 2017
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Dinosaur Planet (TV series). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.--Mr Fink (talk) 04:46, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dinosaur Planet (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Dinosaur Planet (TV series) was changed by AlexCWebb (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85485 on 2017-12-07T13:35:24+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:35, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Subhyracodon. Donner60 (talk) 03:50, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. only (talk) 20:39, 9 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Your unblock request is not the place to continue arguing for your edits. You need to recognise that regardless of whether you think your edits are correct or not, they are not reliably sourced, and appears that you are conducting original research. Zyc1174   chat?   what I did   07:40, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

None of my books explicitly state what happens in that episode. What I mean is that I have at least one book that refers to the incident they are recreating in that episode, and I have several books that corroborate why I think the Wikipedia page is wrong. They all support the position that this is a Giganotosaurus.

And here's the YouTube link to the line in question, where they say Carcharodontosaurs, because there are two of them. Earlier I gave proof that the Giganotosaurus was the Carcharodontosaur in question here. The plural of Carcharodontosaurus is Carcharodontosauruses, which the narrator definitely does not say. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pN2bNibct0A&feature=youtu.be&list=PLrywqALJ5SGdBxPhnKqiAGuTcnZOEzT2Y&t=213

Now, there is one thing I definitely don't understand. I'm being accused of original synthesis, but the links cited on the Wikipedia page do not back up the text, nor is that text found anywhere on those links. [7] points to an archive.org page, which does not list the text in the article at all, and [6] points to a dino viewer that contradicts the text, and corroborates what I'm saying. So how is the current summary on the Wikipedia page not original synthesis? AlexCWebb (talk) 00:05, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
 * At a glance much of the article's current content indeed seems problematic. The way forward, however, should be to remove unsourced content and original synthesis, not to change one kind of inappropriate content into another kind or to add more problematic content. Huon (talk) 19:46, 16 April 2018 (UTC)