User talk:AlexLibman

Person of the Year
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 02:33, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Liberty Forum redirect
You recently created this redirect. You may not have been aware, but that page (Liberty Forum, not New Hampshire Liberty Forum) was previously about a splinter group from Free Republic but the page was later speedily deleted as not being notable enough to warrant a Wikipedia article. This should not affect your ability to have that redirect, but I wanted you to be aware of the history in case someone else comes along and tries to replace the redirect with a copy of the deleted article. Have a nice day. &mdash;Dgiest c 17:36, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Remote Administrator
An editor has nominated Remote Administrator, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:15, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Freenet
The software doesn't even exist yet, there is absolutely no reason to have an encyclopedia article about something hypothetical. -Mike Payne 01:32, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for making me smile
with your edit summary on Ashkenazi intelligence. Enjoy Wikipedia! Yodaat 02:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Edward Lewis Brown revert
Your revert has been undone. If you disagree with my addition, please state why when you revert it. Thanks! 70.159.43.66 13:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

July 2007
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gscshoyru 13:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

This account had a second chance, but squandered it. Therefore it is blocked indefinitely. -- Kinu t /c  21:05, 16 July 2007 (UTC) You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below. {{{category|

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Nsaa (talk) 21:08, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Articles for deletion nomination of Aria (software)
I have nominated Aria (software), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Aria (software). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Otterathome (talk) 19:23, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

List of countries by GDP (PPP) per hour worked
As nearly all contributions to the discussion of that article are highly critical, would you help to improve it? Knopffabrik (talk) 13:23, 19 September 2010 (UTC) PS: Strange you are blocked as "vandalism-only account", your comment seemed fairly reasonable to me.

Victory Gin listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Victory Gin. Since you had some involvement with the Victory Gin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). The Evil IP address (talk) 23:06, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Juby


A tag has been placed on Juby requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Roger (talk) 06:31, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Unblocked
Following a successful appeal to the Subcommittee, you have been unblocked on the following condition: 1. That you are topic banned from editing any article related to Global Warming. 2. That you only edit from your account, User:AlexLibman.  SilkTork  ✔Tea time  08:36, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Category:Independent colleges
Category:Independent colleges, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of ActivePython for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ActivePython is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/ActivePython until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 01:47, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Radmin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Radmin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Radmin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 17:29, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Radmin


Hello, AlexLibman. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Radmin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 20:39, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

January 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Christopher Cantwell are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (talk) 07:20, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 08:10, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of KMLDonkey


The article KMLDonkey has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No longer maintained. Dead project. No longer used in KDE. No coverage. Been on the cat:nn list since 2010. Fails WP:SIGCOV."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC)