User talk:AlexVulovic

Speedy deletion nomination of Mario Leone Bralic


A tag has been placed on Mario Leone Bralic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Linguist If you reply to me here, please add    to the start of your message 20:41, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mario Leone Bralic


A tag has been placed on Mario Leone Bralic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Linguist If you reply to me here, please add    to the start of your message 22:47, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Mario Leone Bralic, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. 2600:1:9245:F7CD:A82C:2C41:F09A:22C (talk) 22:49, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Mario Leone Bralic. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. 2600:1:9245:F7CD:A82C:2C41:F09A:22C (talk) 22:53, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Mario Leone Bralic, you may be blocked from editing. 2600:1:9245:F7CD:A82C:2C41:F09A:22C (talk) 22:54, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Mario Leone Bralic. 2600:1:9245:F7CD:A82C:2C41:F09A:22C (talk) 22:55, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mario Leone Bralic. Drewmutt (talk) 22:58, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. -- ferret (talk) 23:09, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

First of all I was not requesting unblock. I will not ask for one because of:
 * I made useful contribution which you deleted without any explanation
 * I was not making any damage or disruption to Wikipedia
 * I was trying to make useful contribution — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexVulovic (talk • contribs) 23:51, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

I received two messages that you left me a message, but I dont see them AlexVulovic (talk) 23:58, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I created a page for my friend... – so you have a conflict of interest. I'd like to say that I think it's a shame that you've (seemingly) decided to leave Wikipedia. The page you created was not deleted to discourage you from contributing to Wikipedia or to punish you, but because the page you created didn't adhere to Wikipedia's policies; specifically, it was largely written in a promotional tone. Your repeated removal of the speedy deletion tag and your failure to assume good faith was what resulted in your block. Again, this was not to punish you, but to prevent any further disruption to the encyclopedia by you. Also, you have misused your talk page by adding the articles content to it, contrary to the purpose of user pages, so I have removed the content. Now, I should let you know that if, after your block expires, you recreate the article with the promotional text, it will likely be protected so that you cannot create it again. Furthermore, I recommend you read our conflict of interest guideline. We welcome and strongly appreciate any constructive contributions from you. Linguist  If you reply to me here, please add    to the start of your message 00:15, 12 January 2017 (UTC)