User talk:AlexWasFirst

Comments and Messages

DNS was a good example to add to Cache. --User:drj

Welcome--another belated one! I am guessing that you are an English coder named "Alex." :-) No? --User:Larry Sanger

Yes I am a coder, how did you guess! I hope my stuff is ok for you guys :-) Alex

Alex, I've updated ATM. Could you please check it for NPOV, and edit it as you wish. I've explained about the packet jitter issues in detail, and tried to give an unbiased view of ATM. -- The Anome

And I've now at least mentioned AALs, and vaguely talked about AAL1 and AAL5. I'm ignoring the full ghastliness of AAL 3/4 and AAL2 for now. -- The Anome

So you're a Larper in the UK? Are you going to The Gathering? If so, which faction? (Da Viper Boyz!) User:Dragon Dave

Thanks for the Trainspotting info. -- Zoe

Re: cannabis not being beneficial to the lungs: Your objection is both beside the point and somewhat inaccurate. As it was based on smoking (burning), please note that using a vaporizor (which evaporates the cannabinoids without burning any plant material) does not release any of the crud that is released when burning plant material and has no negative effects on the lungs. This is becoming a more common device, especially for medicinal purposes and recreationally as well. As the "effects" section lists only effects of the drug, by whatever method of administration, the statement of beneficiality is valid; I am going to expand my discussion of this, and the qualities of various methods of administration, such as the dangers of smoking, as I proceed to revise the rest of the article.

Second, as regards smoking, there are two qualitative differences between the smoke of tobacco and cannabis: THC vs. nicotine, and levels of radioactivity. First, nicotine itself is simply a very toxic substance to the body (note that it has a low LD50 relative to other substances, whereas THC has a high LD50), and there is increasing evidence that it actually promotes cancer by reducing your bodies defenses against it. Despite what I noted in the article (which I will remedy, with more information), the studies which indicate that THC can promote cancer are largely invalid, whereas the studies which indicate that it can help prevent cancer are much more recent and have been experimental protocol, although the evidence is far from overwhelming and the jury is still out. Secondly, nicotine constricts the same air sacs that THC dilates, thus holding the crud and radioactivity (which I will note in a bit) in smoke, whereas THC enables the lungs to release it effectively. Second, tobacco leaves have radioactive elements which are extremely dangerous when inhaled (as one might expect). Long story short: tobacco is fertilized with phosphates which have various levels of, if I remember correctly, radium which decays into lead-210 and polonium-210 (of these two elements I am sure), both of which have half-lives of decades and stay in and circulate throughout the body, but are especially concentrated at the base of the lungs due to smoking. Heavy tobacco smokers have ~8 times the level of radioactivity in their urine as non-tobacco smokers. Needless to say, this causes problems, especially cancer. A former surgeon general has said that 90% of tobacco-related cancers are caused by radioactivity.

Cannabis is used by many to relieve certain kinds of asthma, and for some, smoking is their method of use, although a vaporizor is, of course, much better. Centrx 19:46, 14 Jan 2004 (UTC)

The relevance of Nicotene and Radioactivity to this argument is nill. The risk was not added to make a good or bad comparison to tobacco. It is just a fact and with the qualification makes sense. Anyway the debate is on the Talk::Cannabis pages -- User:Alex

oi, yes I killed the page because John Mathieson is a vanity page, if it was a real page a redirect would not have been appropriate. The page is about a person of little to no significance probably (if true) put on there by a friend. It was created by an anon user. GrazingshipIV 19:41, Apr 16, 2004 (UTC)

I disagree. Its not a vanity page although I agree its quite short. You may argue about significance but a lot of people came out of Sinclair Research and had impacts on the rest of the industry. -- Alex

Ok, I am going to yield to you (Alex) on this point. I did put a stub message though because the article is horribly short. That is my proposed compromise though I honestly will not do anything should you revert me again. I am finding it hard to understand how I was so belligerent about it before actually. Happy editing :) GrazingshipIV 15:41, May 7, 2004 (UTC)

Demoscene
Nice to see you here, Alex. Keep up the great work. RaD Man 19:36, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

FAC
What's up, We're having trouble reaching the necessary number of votes needed for consensus at []. Please drop by and have a look.. 205.217.105.2 20:02, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Main namespace cleanup
Heya, I've moved [Wikipedians/Alex] to User:Alex/old. There's some edit history, so perhaps you want to keep it. Otherwise just delete it (or ask an admin to do so). --fvw *  20:54, 2004 Dec 14 (UTC)

Unattributed statement
In reference to Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, the section on the five factions was taken from the Canadian Senate committee report, which in turn took that information, and that brief quote (about the manufacturing states group's strategy to "shift as much of the regulatory burden as possible to the raw-material-producing states while retaining as much of their own freedom as possible"), from W.B. McAllister's 1999 book, Drug Diplomacy in the Twentieth Century: An international history. The citations have now been added.

If this satisfactorily answers your question, please cross out the appropriate text at Featured article candidates/Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs/archive1 to indicate your question has been resolved. Thanks, SonicSynergy 03:28, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Convention on Psychotropic Substances
Here is the sequel to Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. Please vote. Thanks, Joo-joo eyeball 14:20, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Respectless image
Some users use the crossed out EU flag on their pages. Would you be willing to leave a note here in order to show them it is offensive? De mortuis... 19:10, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Hi Alex
How are you? Introduce yourself. 81.223.23.159 14:43, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

C Programming
Hello, could you possible suggest me a website and/or a book which explains C very well? Thanks Caglarkoca 14:13, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Random Hello
YEEEEEAH how are u??? lol 217.238.189.178 19:52, 3 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Who are you aside from someone posting from Germany?

Separation of Church & State
Technically, I shouldn't contact you about this but this is disturbing. You believe that religion should not be mixed with government. Church and state means no National Church, not not minglement between government and religion. --69.67.231.5 23:44, 4 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Why is this disturbing? I don't see any reason for a national church. By all means have churches but they shouldn't be intertwined with the state the way the Church of England currently is. Bishops in the house of Lords are fine, but should be appointed by merit (or elected) and not a product of the fact the CofE is the national religion. -- User:Alex 6/3/07

National church article
I stumbled across your user page in the course of looking for info which might be useful in a discussion currently taking place at Talk:National_church. The discussion relates to just what a National Church is, or is not (as distinct from State church or National religion, both of which wikilinks redirect to State religion. From what I see on your user page, I thought you might be interested. -- Boracay Bill 03:59, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Relakks
A tag has been placed on Relakks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Icewedge (talk) 06:39, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Treasure Trap
A tag has been placed on Treasure Trap requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. —  Dæ dαlusContribs /Improve 07:48, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Treasure Trap
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Treasure Trap, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Marasmusine (talk) 18:31, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Maelstrom (live role playing game)
Hi Alex,

I've had Maelstrom (live role playing game) restored from deletion. I'm now trying to find enough sources to reliably establish its notability. Any help would be appreciated!

Thanks, TSP (talk) 01:16, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron


I notice that you are part of Category:Inclusionist_Wikipedians. I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia.

Ikip (talk) 00:25, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Your user page
I found your old user page while checking out some old edits. I have history merged it, so that all edits are in one place. Hope you don't mind. Graham 87 14:48, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Smile!


Alex, Sri  niv  as  has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! Sri niv  as  11:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC) Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. I was the one who helped you out on IRC. have a nice day. Sri niv  as  11:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Test
I never knew you could sign stuff like this Alex (talk) 16:44, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi Alex,

Regarding your NewArtBot and the three battles of Ramla, please see note in the discussiaon page of Project Turkey. (I should add that I 've consulted the editor.(Srnec) Have a good day. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 19:46, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:07, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of OmniRom (operating system) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OmniRom (operating system) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/OmniRom (operating system) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:05, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Editing assistance: UK Parliament
In an attempt to make the UK Parliament page more honest and accurate, a user persistently removed my edits without just cause. The information I removed was untrue and misleading. If you care to view the history page you will see exactly what I mean. This person whoever he or she is is allowing false information to remain on your wiki page. Because their user privilege is greater than mine currently they locked the page. I am writing to request you do not allow this to happen when I readdress the issues on the page, if this is at all possible.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by X.equilibrium.x (talk • contribs) 11:24, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of OmniROM for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OmniROM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/OmniROM until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ViperSnake151  Talk  22:38, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Atari demos


The article Atari demos has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * An article based on original research and unreliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Λeternus (talk) 09:30, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Exceptions


The article The Exceptions has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Λeternus (talk) 09:16, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

The Exceptions
If you want me to restore the article please ask. GiantSnowman 20:36, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ GiantSnowman 09:11, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Alex. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Alex~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 21:45, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 10:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society
Dear ,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. &#x200B;

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 02:41, 9 June 2019 (UTC)